SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

WORK PERMITS

INTERVIEW: ‘The biggest change to work permits in eight years’

Sweden's new work permit laws, which came into effect on Wednesday, have brought in a lot of changes. We spoke to Carl Bexelius, the Migration Agency's Head of Legal Affairs, about how significant they are

INTERVIEW: 'The biggest change to work permits in eight years'
Carl Bexelius, Head of Legal Affairs, at Sweden's Migration Agency, says the new laws are the most extensive changes to work permit law in at least eight years. Photo: Hannah Davidsson/Migration Agency

For the past three months Carl Bexelius, Head of Legal Affairs at Sweden’s Migration Agency, has been working flat out to put in place new structures to deal with the many changes to Sweden’s work permit regime which came into effect on June 1st. 

“The regulations regarding work permits in Sweden haven’t changed significantly in the past seven or eight years, so these changes are quite extensive,” he tells The Local. 

The changes include a new ‘talent visa’, a requirement for employers to alert the agency of any negative changes to employment terms, a requirement for workers bringing their families to show they can support them, and the requirement to show a signed employment contract. 

READ ALSO:

The agency has been busy updating routines, checklists and training manuals for staff, training staff in the new requirements, and taking on new employees to deal with the extra workload the new laws are likely to bring. 

“It’s quite extensive work that we have done, and this should also be looked at in the light of the fact that we have increased numbers of applications for work permits as well, so we have had to hire new staff, as we see that this legislation is quite complex.”

Even with the additional resources in place, though, he still expects the additional requirements on the agency to mean longer processing times for applications, although he said it remained to be seen if this meant extra weeks or extra months. 

“It’s quite difficult to estimate since some of these provisions are entirely new. We haven’t dealt with these cases before,” he said. 

He said it was, for instance, difficult to estimate how many people would apply to come to Sweden on the new “permit for highly skilled persons”, and the same went for some of the other new provisions. 

“We don’t know how much they will be used, basically, so we are monitoring this, this first year, and it shouldn’t be excluded that we need to relocate resources within the agency as well.” 

What will count as a “minor deviation” or a “disproportionate” decision to refuse a permit?  

Bexelius dismissed the criticism that the clauses in the new law designed to stop so-called “talent deportations” left too much room for interpretation. 

“It is very difficult for the legislator to specify all situations, so it’s up to the competent authority that applies these rules, the Migration Agency and the courts as well.” 

But he said that the law had done “a good job” specifying that the Migration Agency should excuse both “minor deviations”, and also more serious deviations where it would be “disproportionate” to refuse a permit. 

He gives a few examples of minor deviations. 

“It could be, for instance, that for a couple of months, the salary has been below what was initially stated, maybe 200-400 kronor. It could be that for a couple of months, the insurance wasn’t in place.” 

When it comes to more serious deviation where it would nonetheless be “disproportionate” to refuse a permit, a lot will come down to whether the explanations given for the mistake are “excusable” and “reasonable”, and also to the past record of the employer. 

What kind of job contract will you need to provide? Is a digital signature good enough? 

A key question people considering applying for work permits have after the new rules have come in is what sort of signed contract they need to send along with their application, as sending paper contracts back and forth to countries in Asia or Africa to be signed can take weeks. Some wonder whether the agency will accept contracts as a digitally signed PDF file. 

“There are no formal requirements, since we have no provisions regarding what a job contract should look like,” Bexelius says. “So the crucial part is that we as the authority can assess the information, and that there is a legal contract between the two parties, and that could take different forms.

“I think we will see different forms of contracts being accepted when this legislation is in place, and I guess we will also see interpretations from the courts.”

How much does the new maintenance requirement raise the bar for work permit applicants? 

The new work permit law does not change the bottom salary that those applying for work permits can be paid, which is currently at a very low 13,000 kronor. It does, however, require first-time applicants who are bringing their families to prove that they can support them. 

They will need to show that they have access to 8,520 SEK if they are bringing a spouse or co-habitant partner, 2,736 kronor for children up to six years old, and 3,150 SEK a month for children over the age of seven. 

“They’re basically a copy of the other rules regarding family reunification. The novelty is that there is such a requirement, because there wasn’t before.” 

Bexelius said that the new requirement would effectively increase the minimum salary needed to receive a work permit for anyone coming with dependents. 

“Quite often, you’re either a single man or woman, so in that sense, there won’t be any changes. But if you want to bring your family as well, yes, that will be the result.” 

Why have so-called “talent deportations” continued to happen so long after the alarm was raised? 

When asked about why “talent deportations”, the refusal of work permits to highly skilled workers, had continued to happen long after it became a big national issue in 2015-2016, Bexelius argued that a lot of the Migration Agency’s decisions had in fact been justified. 

In the preparations for the new legislation, an analysis of about a hundred Migration Agency work permit refusals had found, he said, that less than five percent were for “minor deviations”. 

“They couldn’t find any systematic abuse from the agency in that regard, so I think you should have in mind that there could, of course, be situations where individuals believe that there were minor deviations, but that is not how we assess the current case law.” 

But he also said that the problems around the issue had stemmed from a lack of clear legislation on work permits, which had left too much of burden for interpreting and setting policy with the Migration Agency and the Migration Court. 

“This is an area which is very important for Sweden, and it has been left to the Migration Courts to develop case law in an area where you have seen changes in how you look at work permits and in what you need to do to attract and get highly skilled labour,” he said. 

The legal framework was changed by court judgements in 2015 and in 2017, but no new legislation was put in place, leaving the Migration Agency and lower Migration Courts to rely heavily on case law. 

“There’s quite an extensive case law on the area of work permits from the Migration Court of Appeal — I can’t find another area where you’ve had so many cases, and that is because the Migration Court has deemed it necessary to explain to the lower courts and the Migration Agency how this should work.”

“That poses some problems, because case law developing how applicable provisions should be applied is not as clear and stable as when you have new provisions, particularly where you have preparatory work to explain [the law].” 

Member comments

  1. I within the global immigration team at EY (Ernst & Young AB) where we support Swedish businesses with their immigration programmes including work and residence permit applications. I can tell you that the Migration Agency have not prepared themselves well enough for the new legislation. D visa applications are accepted but they don’t know how to process these application nor are they able to capture biometrics to process applications. The Migration Agency have also been requesting employment contracts to be signed by hand (wet signatures) claiming that they do not have technology to validate digital signatures. There are lots of examples where the Migration Agency are ill equipped to handle the changes that the new legislation has brought and I’d be happy to elaborate on these further.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WORKING IN SWEDEN

‘It will be messy’: Half of foreigners blocked by Sweden’s salary threshold will be graduates

A new analysis by the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise has found that 51 percent of the labour migrants likely to be blocked by a new higher salary threshold will be graduates. Karin Johansson, the organisation's Deputy Director General, told The Local how this will hurt businesses.

'It will be messy': Half of foreigners blocked by Sweden's salary threshold will be graduates

When Migration Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard received the results of a government inquiry into setting the median salary as the threshold for new work permits, she said that highly qualified foreign workers would not be affected. 

“This is an important step in our work to tighten requirements for low-qualified labour migrants and at the same time to liberalise and improve the rules for highly qualified labour migration,” she said. “Sweden should be an attractive country for highly qualified workers.” 

But according to the confederation’s new analysis, published last week, graduates will in fact make up the majority of those blocked from coming to Sweden, if the government increases the minimum salary to be eligible for a work permit to 34,200 kronor a month from the 27,400 kronor a month threshold which came into force last November. 

“The politicians’ argument does not hold up,” Johansson told The Local. “More than 50 percent of those who have this kind of salary are skilled workers with a graduate background. These are the people that that the government has said that they really want to have in Sweden. So we are a little bit surprised that they are still going to implement this higher salary threshold.” 

Of those earning between 80 percent of the median salary (27,360 kronor) and the median salary (34,200 kronor), the study found that 30 percent were working in jobs that required “extended, university-level competence”, and a further 21 percent in jobs requiring “university-level education or higher”. 

“They are technicians and engineers, and many of the others are also really skilled workers that are hard to find on the Swedish labour market at the moment,” Johansson said. 

The proposals made by inquiry were put out for consultation in February, with the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise planning to submit its response later this week. 

Johansson said that further raising the threshold risked exacerbating the serious labour shortage already suffered by Swedish companies. 

"In our recruitment survey, we have discovered that 30 percent of all planned hires never get made because companies cannot find the right people," she said. "Many companies are simply having to say 'no' to businesses. They can't expand. So, of course, it will have an impact on the Swedish economy if they now increase the salary threshold. We know that there will be fewer people coming from abroad to work in Sweden." 

Johansson said she had little faith in the exemption system proposed by the inquiry, under which the the Swedish Public Employment Service will draw up a list of proposed job descriptions or professions to be exempted, with the Migration Agency then vetting the list before sending it on to the government for a final decision. 

"The decision of who will be exempted will be in some way a political one, and in our experience, it's the companies that know best what kind of people they need," she said. "So we are not in favour of that kind of solution. But, of course, it's better than nothing." 

She said that companies were already starting to lobby politicians to ensure that the skills and professions they need to source internationally will be on the list of exemptions, a lobbying effort she predicted would get only more intense if and when the new higher salary requirement comes into force next June.  

"If you have a regulation, not every company can have an exemption. You need to say 'no' sometimes, and that will be hard for companies to accept," she predicted. "And then they will lobby against the government, so it will be messy. Certainly, it will be messy." 

Although there are as yet no statistics showing the impact of raising the minimum salary for a work permit to 80 percent of the median salary last November, Johansson said that her members were already reporting that some of their foreign employees were not having their work permits renewed. 

"What we are hearing is that many of the contracts companies have with labour from third countries have not been prolonged and the workers have left," she said. 

Rather than hiring replacements in Sweden, as the government has hoped, many companies were instead reducing the scale of their operations, she said. 

"The final solution is to say 'no' to business and many companies are doing that," she said. "If you take restaurants, for example, you might have noticed that many have shortened their opening hours, they have changed the menus so it's easier with fewer people in the kitchen. And also shops, the service sector, they have fewer staff."

To give a specific example, she said that Woolpower, a company based in Östersund that makes thermal underwear, supplying the Swedish Armed Forces, had been struggling to recruit internationally. 

"They have seamstresses from more than 20 different countries and it's more or less impossible to find a seamstress in Sweden today," she said. "It's really hard for them to manage the situation at the moment and they are a huge supplier to Swedish defence." 

She said that the new restrictions on hiring internationally were also forcing existing employees and also company owners to work harder.  

"Current employees need to work longer hours than they have done and if you're a small business, you, as an owner, will work more than you have done before," she said. 

The best solution, she said, would be to abolish the salary thresholds and return to Sweden's former work permit system, which required that international hires receive the salary and other benefits required under collective bargaining agreements with unions. 

But she said that the government's reliance on the support of the Sweden Democrats party, enshrined in the Tidö Agreement, meant this was unlikely to happen. 

"This is the result of the Tidö Agreement, and you if you take away one single piece of this agreement, I think maybe everything will fall apart. So I think it's hard. When we discuss this with the different parties, they all agree that they want to push ahead with it. But it's the Sweden Democrats who put this on the table when they made their agreement." 

SHOW COMMENTS