SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

OPINION AND ANALYSIS

OPINION: Are foreigners to blame if they find the Swiss unfriendly?

There is a perception in Switzerland that Swiss natives and foreigners just don't really get on. Clare O'Dea explains why there might be a lack of chemistry and where the blame may lie.

OPINION: Are foreigners to blame if they find the Swiss unfriendly?
OPINION: In defence of the ‘unfriendly’ Swiss. Claudio Schwarz on Unsplash

I was once on a bus in Geneva, suffering from morning sickness on that particular day, on my way out to Cern for an interview. A man sitting across from me started to talk. Under the guise of striking up a friendly conversation, he kept asking me questions about myself. ‘Where do you live? Where are you going? Are you a student?’

It doesn’t happen to me anymore but young women will recognise this scenario. I felt cornered and it got the point where I had to tell him to stop quizzing me. ‘Typical Swiss,’ he snapped back at me. ‘Cold and unfriendly.’

It’s an easy accusation to throw around, based as it is on a well-known cliché. At the time I was not Swiss. I had only lived here for a few years having moved from Ireland, a nation famed for its friendliness. 

The extra irony is, I do chat to strangers on public transport, when it happens naturally and without an agenda. I’ve had interesting conversations in this way over the years. I became a Swiss citizen in 2015. Am I a friendly Swiss person or a friendly Irish person now? It shouldn’t matter. 

OPINION: Switzerland’s denial of voting rights to foreigners motivated by fear

But the reputation of the Swiss for coldness seems to have staying power. At the very least, the perception seems to be that there is a lack of chemistry between Swiss and foreigners in this country. So is that a fair and accurate assessment? 

When it comes to the romantic side of things. Swiss people marry foreigners in large numbers. In a given year, a quarter of Swiss brides and grooms choose foreign spouses. Presumably some chemistry is involved in those marriages.

My impression is that the main source for the idea of the Swiss being unfriendly is anecdotal. In my early years as an immigrant, I noticed that fellow foreigners enjoyed sharing anecdotes of encounters with unfriendly Swiss people. Integration can be a lonely and frustrating process beset with misunderstandings. But are these stories being emphasised because they confirm a stereotype or because Swiss unfriendliness is a widespread phenomenon? 

READ ALSO: Why it’s almost impossible for foreigners to become fully integrated Swiss citizens

Hard facts are hard to come by in this subjective area. Some “expat” surveys back up the idea that it’s difficult to befriend the Swiss. But if someone defines themselves as an expat, does that not mean they are living somewhat apart from the local population?  

There’s another stereotype, expat. A high-income foreigner living in Switzerland on a temporary basis, whose work life is English-speaking and multinational. The natives are just extras in the movie of their lives, a movie that will continue elsewhere. Is this the best group to be interpreting what the Swiss are truly like? Is this description fair and accurate? 

Of course there are many different types of foreigners and not enough surveys to cover them all. There are the people with Swiss partners, who have the advantage of tapping into their partner’s ready-made network, which usually means more fast-tracked integration.

There are foreigners born in Switzerland – one in four of the population – who grew up with the Swiss and probably have friends for life who are Swiss. How should their friendliness or lack of it be counted? 

Generally speaking, language fluency and time spent in Switzerland are probably the key determinants of whether the relationship between outsiders and the Swiss is successful. Not to forget personality! 

It also helps to put aside any pre-conceived notions about the Swiss when you come to live here. That’s easier said than done. The Swiss are the rich kid of Europe, somewhat aloof in their international relations, while domestic politics has its xenophobic moments. 

But to view individual people you meet as embodying these characteristics can be a self-fulfilling prophecy. This is a very diverse country, in terms of language, class, politics, regional differences, and immigration background. 

Perhaps I should mention that I have found the Swiss warm, welcoming and kind. Not everyone, not everywhere, not always, but enough people to maintain my faith in Swiss humanity. Compared to the society I come from, they don’t feel social pressure to perform superficial friendliness. And that’s ok because different countries have different norms.    

The British-Swiss writer Diccon Bewes refers to the Swiss as being like coconuts, in that it’s hard to break through their outer shell, but once you do, you have a friend for life. 

READ ALSO: How hard is it to make friends in Switzerland?

Some things are universal. Two ingredients that have made it easier for me to establish friendships are regular contact and common ground. Times where people are thrown together and where nationality doesn’t matter.

Maybe the issue is that many foreigners first encounter the Swiss through work or officialdom. But Swiss people are like Clark Kent, living double lives. They don’t reveal their true selves at work. Their true selves are in their passions. 

Hobbies are where it’s at. If you find the Swiss at play or following their passions, you will be able to connect with them because you will be like-minded to some extent.

Whether it’s sports, music or some commitment to the community, the Swiss love joining clubs and associations and organising stuff. Unlike work aperos, people don’t rush home after these gatherings. All you have to do is grab your little glass of white wine and join in.  

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

PENSIONS

OPINION: Switzerland faces two pension votes but neither offers a solution

Switzerland's two public votes on Sunday March 3rd offer Swiss voters two different versions of reality – the elderly as vulnerable versus the elderly as strong. Clare O’Dea asks whether pensioners need protection or a push.

OPINION: Switzerland faces two pension votes but neither offers a solution

The first popular initiative, launched by trade unions, is called ‘To live better in retirement’. This noble aspiration comes with an annual price tag of four billion francs. The proposal is to increase the annual state pension by 8.33 percent by making a thirteenth annual payment.

The second initiative emanates from a completely different world view, championed by the youth section of the Radical-Liberal Party. It aims to increase the retirement age from 65 to 66 by 2033, and then to tie it to life expectancy. This idea comes with an annual saving of two billion francs.

Voters will get to decide if older people should receive more or give more, or whether to leave the status quo. Both ideas suffer from being rather blunt instruments but they will serve as an interesting test of public opinion.

Free money

The Swiss are traditionally cautious about voting for ‘free stuff’, even when it might benefit them directly. Statutory paid maternity leave was turned down four times before finally being accepted in 2005. Voters said no to two weeks more annual leave in 2012 and rejected a minimum wage in 2014.

The 2.5 million people – every Swiss resident over the age of 65 – who currently receive the state pension, known as the Old Age and Survivors’ Insurance, can’t be counted on to vote to receive a higher pension. Why? Because most of them don’t need it.

In addition to this basic first-pillar payment (up to a maximum of CHF32,000 annually for a single person), pensioners may have income from their occupational pension, private pension, or both. These are known as the second and third pillar of the pension system.

Retirees whose combined pension payments are not enough to meet their living costs are entitled to complementary social assistance payments. In 2021, that was 12.5 per cent of pensioners.

READ ALSO: The reasons why living in Switzerland can prolong your life

Expensive times?

Inflation in Switzerland is relatively low – 2.1 percent in 2023 was considered a bad year. But it’s also not a great measure of the cost of living, particularly as it does not include health insurance premiums, which are up 8.7 percent in 2024 alone.

There is no doubt that some older people struggle to make ends meet – and they would de delighted to have an extra 1,225 to 2,450 francs per year (current range of the monthly payment) to get by. But is that a reason to give everyone over 65 extra money – including the wealthy?

The fundamental flaw with this proposed reform is that it is not means tested. Making a universal payment is an extremely expensive way to help people who are genuinely facing poverty. It is estimated that one in five pensioners live below or close to the poverty line – counting income, not assets.

It seems clear that the energy put into this initiative would have been better spent designing a measure that would target those who actually need the money. But if you do want to help the needy, right here, right now, this initiative would at least be a quick fix.

Losing support

The proposal to increase retirement age has also been rejected by the government, which is not comfortable with the concept of building in the automatic link to life expectancy – in other words, basing policy on a mathematical formula.

But the initiative campaign says raising the retirement age is the best way to save the state pension while being fair to all generations. The pension pot is mainly funded by today’s workers, in the expectation that they will have the same benefit one day.

Sunday’s votes are people’s initiatives, based on the collection of signatures. To pass, they need not just a simple majority but a majority of cantons to say yes. Neither appear to be in a strong position.

The retirement age proposal looks sure to be defeated, especially as voters just accepted an increase in women’s retirement age from 63 to 65 in 2022, which is still being rolled out. The notion that the rich could still afford to retire while ordinary workers will be chained to their jobs for longer rankles with voters.

After a strong start, support for the thirteenth pension payment has been ebbing away and a ‘yes’ vote now looks in doubt. The results will be closely watched on Sunday.

More complex answers

Most people realise that the retirement age will have to be hiked up sooner or later, but to actually persuade the Swiss to vote for this scenario, there would need to be plenty of extra measures to guarantee fairness and flexibility.

What a lot of the debate around ageing and retirement funding seems to miss is that the elderly are a mixed bunch in terms of privilege. Policies that don’t take into account that complexity are not much help.

Yes, most Swiss people of retirement age are in reasonably good health and in a good financial situation. At 83 years, Swiss life expectancy is among the highest in the world. Depending on the job, the economy could probably squeeze an extra year of work out of them.

However, this segment of the population, born around 1959, cannot be lumped together as one homogenous group. Women and immigrants tend to accumulate smaller pensions. Single people are generally worse off than couples. 

Some have a life of disadvantage and hard jobs behind them; others benefitted from a world-class, heavily subsidised education and have built up huge assets. Some are fit as fiddles, leaping from one mountain peak to the next, and some already suffer from multiple geriatric health problems.

Answers to their needs will have to be written on more than the back of a postcard.

SHOW COMMENTS