SHARE
COPY LINK

SCHOOLS

OPINION: I believe Sweden will regret its approach to Covid in schools

Sweden's Covid-19 strategy for schools is complex, but nonchalant attitudes and a lack of systematic protection for schoolchildren can only be described as irresponsible, argues Lisa Bjurwald in this opinion piece.

OPINION: I believe Sweden will regret its approach to Covid in schools
File photo of a schoolchild in Sweden. Photo: Lars Pehrson/SvD/TT

In the US, liberal news media are reporting with horror that several Republican-led states will penalise schools that require masks. This despite the number of infected children soaring, not least in Republican states such as Florida and Texas, and despite leading public health experts including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommending universal indoor masking in schools this year.

In Swedish schools, you’d be hard-pressed to find any measures at all, if you don’t count a few bottles of sanitiser here and there and (at least in some schools, and at least in the first months of the pandemic) extra spacious seating in the dining halls. Masks have never been mandatory or even socially accepted herecertainly not in the classrooms. Yet this school year, närundervisning (in-school teaching, or literally “close teaching”) will replace distance learning.

Instructions to schools from the Public Health Agency of Sweden are meek and, just as the Swedish pandemic strategy as a whole, based on recommendations”, advice”, “suggestions” and the like, rather than mandatory rules. If possible, work in smaller groups [than usual],” and so on.

On August 12th, the Public Health Agency and The Swedish National Agency for Education (Skolverket) announced that the possibility of preventive distance learning has been removed. This in the face of renewed spread and mutated strains. As opposed to neighbouring countries Finland and Denmark, Sweden hasn’t lowered the recommended vaccine age to include children, instead sticking with 16 years of age (thus excluding the entire elementary school system).

To some parents, foreign and Swedish-born alike, this idea of business as usual is a relief. Not that they don’t care about their children’s well-being, but rather that the unique Swedish approach to Covid-19 has allowed for young school-aged children to live normal lives during a potentially frightening global crisis.

Many of us who have friends and family abroad know what a toll regular school closings and futile attempts at homeschooling have taken on parents and pupils alike. I have close friends in London who were all nearly having a nervous breakdown at different times during the past year, their young, hyper-energetic broods literally climbing the walls” (as we say in Sweden) out of frustration.

On the other side of these walls, mums and dads were trying and failing to have serious job conversations over Skype. It would have been funny for a week or two, a story to tell the grandchildren, but months on end, with no end in sight? No wonder European psychiatric helplines have nearly crashed from the number of desperate callers.

But there’s also a group of Sweden-based parents increasingly worried about the country’s lax attitude towards Covid-19, not least in the classrooms. As the new Delta variant of the virus is dominating the spread, and infection rates are increasing in major cities like Stockholm, anxiety is brewing over the return to schools this week.

MORE BY LISA BJURWALD:

The message from the Swedish government and Public Health Agency has consistently been that kids don’t get sick from the coronavirus. But reports of Long Covid in children tell a different story. While children fortunately end up in hospital emergency units very rarely, they can develop the same debilitating post-Covid symptoms as adults, including extreme tiredness, recurring fever spells, and frightening cognitive symptoms like brain fog” with difficulties focusing.

No one knows how long Long Covid lasts. Tens of thousands of those infected in the spring of 2020 around the globe are still suffering from the after-effects. The WHO has acknowledged post-Covid as a global health concern. Networks and organisations for the affected have been set up, clinical research initiated. But the Swedish response has been gruellingly slow, particularly in comparison with countries such as the United Kingdom, where a heap of special post-Covid clinics has been set up to care for the ill.

A recent report from the Swedish Children’s Ombudsman studied the consequences of Covid-19 on children’s rights and found that a surprising number of Swedish children are suffering from severe, life-altering post-Covid symptoms. I write in-depth in Swedish about the report here.

The fact that children can be negatively affected physically by the virus puts the Swedish pandemic school strategy – or lack thereof – in a different light.

A measured, fact-based response is preferable to a gut reaction driven by fear and/or populism, as seen across the world since the outbreak early last year. If children could neither get infected nor spread the potentially deadly disease, schools could pretty much be exempt from preventive measures.

But now, a year and a half into the Covid-19 pandemic, science tells us differently. Children can both spread the virus to vulnerable family members – especially with the sneakier Delta variant – and suffer severe post-Covid symptoms themselves, even if the infection itself was mild.

With this knowledge in mind, the lack of protection for our youngest citizens and the nonchalant attitudes from those in power cannot be described as anything else but irresponsible. I believe that this will be a major issue of regret and reckoning for Sweden in the post-pandemic years.

Lisa Bjurwald is a Swedish journalist and author covering current affairs, culture and politics since the mid-1990s. Her latest work BB-krisen, on the Swedish maternity care crisis, was dubbed Best reportage book of 2019 by Aftonbladet daily newspaper. She is also an external columnist for The Local – read her columns here.

Member comments

  1. Cobbler, stick to your trade.
    Sweden is one of the few countries not overreacting. The only scientific fact they do not follow is using an experimental vaccine product on adolescents, whose immune system still evolves. Disclaimer: i am pro vax.

  2. Stop your fear propaganda that mostly has to rely one words like “could”, “would” and “maybe”.
    The real damage to the well-being of children can be observed clearly in other lockdown and vaccination-enthusiastic countries.
    Sweden is doing absolutely right!
    Help to keep our children healthy – not just with respect to “maybe” COVID but also to all other dimensions of physical and mental health.

    1. I fully agree and also take a look at the ema register. Per end of June we have in 6 month more than 160000 cases of serious vaccination effects, i.e that are those causing hospitalisation and remaining damages and over 20000 deaths in the EU. I wouldn’ call that a solution to the problem. While it is obvious by simply valueing the figures that young people and espially children don’t have a problem and please stop the nonsense with so called ling covid.

  3. I am proVAX and I disrespect Tegnell. His initial plan of spreading the virus to distribute the disease was meaningful in a scenario where no vaccine would have been on the horizon for the next, say, 5 years. We had a vaccine in less than a year. Tegnell did absolutley nothing to mitigate the spread in public spaces (transport, supermarkets …) where the simple use of a surgical mask could reduce the spread, is adopted almost everywhere in Europe, and is recommended by WHO. Folkhälsomyndigheten does not even contemplate the use of this simple “device”. Even traveling by plane is a funny experience: signs everywhere to wear masks, and at least 30% of the people wearing no masks at the terminals, and even inside the plane, not even the stewards. Why? because nobody explained that a mask does not save your ass, it protects the others.I found this really … disappointing for a country that praises itself as a champion of social consideration, in this case towards the one who cannot vaccinate. I read on this line that last winter a kid in Stockholm was sent home because he was wearing a mask at school. This is a blatant violation of his individual liberty: was he hurting someone? no. But he was probably sending the “wrong message” to his schoolmates. Having said that Sweden, having probably 5x the number of casualties of Denmark, is not doing too bad, considering that they haven t practiced any lock-down for example: but this is possible because (A) we have a lot of space, (B) Sweden is a very beautiful country but not a tourist magnet, and I mean it.

    1. I sympathize with your argumentation but would like to point out that you operate under the assumption that the vaccines are sterilizing, i.e. wipe out the infection. The end goal of all vaccine trials was to reduce burden on the healthcare system. As such significant reduction of middle to severe covid cases was chosen as the goal. The vaccines work wonders with regard to that but do not protect from transmitting the virus. Israel, ahead of all other countries, shows it clearly to us: a variant emerges that has higher virus titer in general and equal titer in nasal swaps of vaccinated and naive population.

      To long did not read: the virus is here to stay and no vaccine will change that. Swedens strategy had not to be adapted.

  4. totally disagree with this article. I’ve seen the terrible mental health problems from kids wearing masks etc in the US. Keep it as normal for the kids as possible!!

    1. If this article had been written one year earlier, then possibly people could still reasonably believe it. However in September 2021 there is overwhelming evidence that the Swedish response, which was amongst the least authoritarian in the world, has been superior from every single vantage point.

      Israel, Australia and New Zealand implemented the exact opposite strategies and there is no metric that shows they have performed better than Sweden.

      I would like to see this author’s corporate ties. Perhaps she would be willing to share them with her audience?

      Sweden won.

  5. Also, don’t compare Sweden’s numbers only to the Nordics to make a point. Compared to the rest of Europe, Sweden has done tremendously well without much restrictions, and will be better off in the long term

  6. Lisa …I think you may well have a valid argument here. What do other readers think will happen in schools this winter? I am not optimistic that the situation is being addressed at all. What frustrates me the most is not only aren’t basic protective mensures in place in schools , but it’s as if Delta doesn’t even exist! I agree that masks all day for kids is miserable and a vaccine for over 12’s is controversial to say the least. But please Sweden let’s be proactive and accept what’s coming and do something to at least minimise the blow. Although not ideal (and I’m certainly not a fan) home school may be the only temporary solution going forward. I don’t have the answers but I think Lisa is right to question the lax attitude towards what we know will be a highly contagious virus being spread among the unvaccinated. Long covid can’t be brushed off and for any child to suffer long term would be an unfair consequence of the ’nonchalant’ attitude of those in power, and dare I say like minded parents.

    1. I understand your worries but think they have to be kept in balance with other damages.
      I live in Germany and can see the tremendous REAL physical and psychological damage to children caused by “homeschooling” (which actually was more a joke than any school!), masks in schools and alike.
      It’s not just wearing masks, it’s letting all decisions and behaviors be driven be plain FEAR about POSSIBLE/EVENTUAL effects which is the problem.
      Sweden is well adviced not to let this happen and better first see what really happens instead of over-reacting on very blurred maybes and thereby causing a lot more real harm.
      Stay calm and confident, enjoy life, relax and keept moving/exercising. This will contribute to everybodies health a lot more than masks, isolation and experimental medicine.

      1. I agree with much of your well grounded reply. We need to learn to live with covid and home schooling should only be a last resort if the situation spirals out of control – which of course I hope it doesn’t. But the wait and see approach doesn’t cut it for me. Just take a look at what’s happening in the US right now. Cases among kids are rising fast in the face of Delta and more children are ending up in hospital. The American Academy of Pediatrics said it – This is not last year’s covid…kids are going to be affected the most. To quote a recent Local article ”masks, covid jabs, tests and ventilation” this is how German children are returning to school. In Sweden we have none of that. Over reaction is damaging …under reaction is just as damaging.

  7. My UK school was Victorian and violent. I would have loved an opportunity (like Covid) to learn from home, over a computer, and could learn far more left undisturbed to read, rather than wasting time in their classrooms. Swedish schools might be more moderate, but some kids actually benefit from staying at home and not having to sit with bullies all day long.

    1. Dear Alastair,
      So sorry to hear that. I know there’s widespread bullying in Swedish schools, too (no country is spared, I presume), yet the media coverage here tends to focus on the pupils suffering from distance learning rather than a balanced reporting, which would include experiences similar to yours. Thus, valuable input! Thank you very much for commenting.
      Best, Lisa B.

  8. Have read all of your interesting comments above; thank you for taking part in the discussion! Face masks for kids are too restrictive, in my point of view. Homeschooling obviously not a long-term option. But the Delta mutation IS a cause for concern, and long covid cannot be brushed off. Certainly not an easy question, many aspects to take into consideration… Best, Lisa B.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

OPINION & ANALYSIS

‘The Sweden Democrats no longer need to worry about how they appear’ 

The Sweden Democrats spent years distancing themselves from their extremist past, but recently the far-right party has edged back closer to the fringes of the nationalist movement, says Expo Foundation researcher Jonathan Leman. 

‘The Sweden Democrats no longer need to worry about how they appear’ 

When the Sweden Democrats entered the Riksdag for the first time in 2010 they were isolated and shunned by all other parties. In 2014 their share of the vote grew and the establishment parties cobbled together the so-called December Agreement to keep the Sweden Democrats at bay. 

By 2018 the sands of Swedish politics had shifted again. Months after the election that September the leader of the Christian Democrats, Ebba Busch, ripped down the cordon sanitaire that had surrounded the Sweden Democrats when she shared a meatball lunch with its leader Jimmie Åkesson. The Moderates, then the biggest party on the right, soon followed suit and the party that had emerged in 1988 from the ashes of the racist Keep Sweden Swedish movement was finally in from the cold. 

This centre-right embrace kickstarted a new approach from a party that for years had publicly washed its hands of the more extreme elements of the broader nationalist movement, says Jonathan Leman, a researcher with the Expo Foundation which monitors and exposes far-right extremism in Sweden. 

“The Sweden Democrats no longer need to be worried about how they appear so that they can be accepted. Because once the door is opened to them by parties who are willing to cooperate with them, their worry about appearing racist or extremist becomes rather a worry of appearing politically correct or not radical enough,” he tells The Local’s Sweden in Focus podcast (out Saturday, March 11th). 

By re-building the bridges it had previously burned with Sweden’s complex and influential network of right-wing alternative media outlets the party could neutralise a potential enemy and re-connect with the grassroots nationalist movement. 

“These alternative outlets are either a friend or a foe. As a friend, they will sort of pave the way for you, they will attack your political opponents. And as a foe, they will give you a headache. So I think it’s a calculation that ‘we can get away with the closer relation with this alternative media environment now.’” 

In 2022 the Sweden Democrats became the biggest party on the right of Swedish politics, with a voter share of 20.5 percent, and Leman says he’s worried that the three governing parties’ reliance on support from the Sweden Democrats means they are reluctant to express criticism when the party oversteps accepted boundaries. Like many other countries, Sweden upholds a principle that politicians should stay at arm’s length from decision-making in the cultural sphere: they help establish the framework but agree to stay out of day-to-day decision making. 

But what happens when a party refuses to accept this principle? And is there cause for concern when, as happened recently, Sweden Democrats at the local level move to block cultural events like drag queen story hours, or a Lucia procession fronted by a student who identified as non-binary?

“I think it’s very worrying. And I think that this sort of relative silence from the other parties in the Tidö cooperation makes it even more worrying,” says Leman. “I think it encourages SD to move forward with this sort of culture war, this sort of war they’re waging on constitutional democracy or liberal democracy.”

__

Tune in to Sweden in Focus on Saturday to hear more from Jonathan Leman on why the Sweden Democrats espoused the idea of “open Swedishness”, how far its anti-racist zero tolerance policy stretches, whether the party’s links to pro-Kremlin sections of the alternative media sphere represent a security threat for Sweden, and how the party will navigate a balancing act between the centre-right and extreme right as it seeks to further broaden its appeal to voters. 

Follow the podcast: Apple | Spotify | Google

SHOW COMMENTS