Why a remnant of patriarchal law still haunts Sweden

A centuries-old provision in Sweden's inheritance law means a noble family's property is often bequeathed to the first-born son. Although slowly dying out, it is still in use today, provoking controversy in a country that champions gender equality.

Why a remnant of patriarchal law still haunts Sweden
Carl Johan Cronstedt is the tenth generation to own Fullerö estate in Västerås. Photo: Hélène Dauschy/AFP

Carl Johan Cronstedt, a member of the Swedish nobility, is the tenth generation to have inherited the family estate and home.

Built in 1656 and designed by French-born architect Jean de la Vallee, Fullerö castle and its 700-hectare (1,729-acre) estate has been handed down from father to son since 1739, when Cronstedt’s ancestor made it a fideicommissum.

Under this centuries-old provision in Sweden’s inheritance law, a noble family’s property is bequeathed to a single heir – in practice, usually a son – to the detriment of other siblings. The aim is to keep the estate intact. 

Imported from Germany, Swedish nobility adopted the practice in the 17th century. It required families to stipulate the criteria for becoming the heir – commonly at that time, it was the first-born son – which was then to be respected by all the generations to come.

“It was a way for the rich to maintain their strong position in society,” Martin Dackling, a historian at Lund University, told AFP.

While, in theory, an eldest daughter could be named the beneficiary in a will, in the vast majority of cases properties are passed to the son, he said.

“Sweden is one of the last countries that still has this,” Dackling added. “It’s an almost feudal remnant and it’s somewhat remarkable that it can remain in Sweden where you normally don’t have these types of differences left.”

The tenth generation

Well-dressed and jovial, Carl Johan Cronstedt, 75, takes pleasure in regaling Fullerö’s history as he welcomes visitors to the charming, wooden building, located about 10 kilometres from the eastern city of Västerås.

Carl Johan Cronstedt, surrounded by paintings of his ancestors. Photo: Hélène Dauschy/AFP 

In the castle’s left wing, he proudly displays a letter written by 18th-century philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau to one of his ancestors.

“I am the tenth generation at Fullerö. I have a son, a daughter and five grandchildren,” the count says, turning to his 45-year-old son and oldest child, also named Carl.

“If the fideicommissum is extended it is my son who will inherit Fullerö after my passing,” Cronstedt says. His wish is for the estate to remain in the family.

In 1963, acknowledging that the form of inheritance was falling into obsolescence, Sweden’s social-democratic government passed a law to dismantle the few hundred remaining fideicommissums.

However, it retained the possibility that a fideicommissum could be extended by the government if petitioned by a family. Nearly 50 years later, 10 fideicommissums remained and the dismantling has dragged on due to several extensions granted in the 1990s.

“If the historical and cultural value of the property cannot be preserved from one generation to the next, the government can grant an extension of the fideicommissum, but only for one generation at a time,” Dackling said.

In 1995, Fullerö was granted its first extension, after the family argued that the estate would become fragmented if passed on to several heirs, thereby risking its historical value. Following that decision, several fideicommissums used the same argument to keep their estates intact.

Cronstedt now wants the exception to be extended indefinitely, a request which sparked controversy after it was reported in the Swedish media earlier this year.

No place in modern society

Former government minister Annika Strandhäll told the Dagens Nyheter newspaper that the system had no place in modern society.

“There should reasonably be other ways to preserve the historic, cultural and natural interests [of a site] other than through a fideicommissum,” she said.

The count says that if their request were granted, the privilege would no longer be reserved to the family’s male heirs.

“In addition to the application for the extension, we have also applied for it to be done gender neutrally, meaning the eldest child will get the fideicommissum, instead of the eldest son,” he said.

Carl Cronstedt the younger will inherit part if not all of the Fullerö estate. Photo: Hélène Dauschy/AFP  

Walking across a freshly mown lawn on an unusually hot summer day, Carl Cronstedt the younger says he hopes to keep the estate, as his father did, so that he can take care of “an old farm that has a lot of cultural and historical value”.

If his family’s request is denied, the law set up to dismantle fideicommissums still remains favourable to him, as half of the estate will go to him, while the other half would be divided between him and his sister.

His sister, also concerned about preserving the estate, supports the family’s case being presented to the government.

Beyond sibling injustice, journalist Björn af Kleen, who wrote Jorden de ärvde (The Land They Inherited), argues that the survival of the fideicommissum has allowed Swedish aristocrats to keep their properties – often valued at several million euros – through the centuries.

In regions such as Skåne and Södermanland, 13 percent of the land still belongs to noble families, even though they only make up 0.25 percent of the population, Kleen says.

Nioucha Zakavati/AFP

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


VIDEO: Three times Sweden poked fun at Eurovision

With Sweden one of the favourites to win Eurovision this year, let's take a look at the times when the country showed up the sheer ridiculousness of the song contest.

VIDEO: Three times Sweden poked fun at Eurovision

Eurovision is often known for eyebrow-raising entries featuring bizarre local traditions or, frankly, eccentric outfits. Although Sweden takes the contest seriously when it comes to its song entries, that doesn’t mean Swedes don’t sometimes celebrate the weirdness of Eurovision.

Love Love Peace Peace

Who could forget Måns Zelmerlöv and Petra Mede’s run as Eurovision presenters in Stockholm in 2016? Zelmerlöw, who won the contest the year before in Vienna, was joined by comedian Mede, who had presented the contest in Malmö three years earlier.

The two performed a sketch titled, “Love Love Peace Peace”, an attempt to make the perfect winning Eurovision song. The clip features former winners Lordi who won for Finland in 2006, and Alexander Rybak, the Norwegian violinist who won for Norway in 2009.

Watch the clip below and see how many references to previous Eurovision entries you can recognise.



In this bizarre clip from Sweden’s Eurovision Song Contest qualifiers Melodifestivalen in 2009, Swedish comedy group Grotesco perform a mid-show sketch full of Russian stereotypes, including Cossack dancers, matryoshka stacking dolls, and a chorus of men dressed like Russian soldiers. The choreography also featured several scantily clad women wearing tight-fitting shorts with a single red star splaying their legs toward the camera in unison.

The clip caused controversy in Russia, after The Local reached out to Russia’s embassy in Stockholm for a comment – a spokesperson called the song “offensive” and “disconnected”, and condemned the sketch in an official statement:

“We do not react to eccentricity by some lunatics whose Russophobia should place them in an asylum rather than on Globen’s stage.”

See the clip for yourself here:


Lill Lindfors and her wardrobe malfunction

Lill Lindfors, a Finnish-Swedish singer and comedian, presented the 1985 Eurovision Song Contest in Gothenburg following Sweden’s win the previous year in Luxembourg.

Prior to hosting Eurovision in 1985, she had placed second in the 1966 contest with the song “Nygammal vals”.

In a clip which reportedly displeased the European Broadcasting Union who manage the contest, the bottom half of Lindfors’ dress was ripped off by a piece of set, exposing her underwear.

Lindfors paused, feigning shock, before quickly pulling a new dress down from the remaining top half of her outfit.

You can watch the iconic moment here (narrated by Terry Wogan, the BBC’s Eurovision commentator for many years) and decide for yourself whether it was meant to happen or not: