SHARE
COPY LINK

COVID-19 HEALTH PASS

France to impose health pass in shopping centres despite court advice

The French government intends to require visitors to large shopping centres to carry a health pass, despite concerns from the country’s highest administrative court that this would infringe on people's freedoms.

France to impose health pass in shopping centres despite court advice
The Conseil d'Etat building in Paris. Photo: Bertrand Guay | AFP

But the government has adapted other planned rules in the bill extending Covid-19 public health measures, following an advisory opinion provided on Monday afternoon by the Council of State, which scrutinises bills before they come to parliament.

The Council of State had recommended against requiring anyone going to a large shopping mall to have a health pass, showing either proof of vaccination or a recent negative Covid test. It did agree, however, that authorities should be able to impose mandatory Covid-19 vaccinations on healthcare workers and oblige anyone who tests positive to self-isolate for 10 days.

On the day the bill was presented to the Council of Ministers, before being put before MPs later this week, the Council of State said the requirement for visitors to shopping centres to carry a health pass constituted a “disproportionate infringement of freedoms”.

It said those who are unable to be vaccinated for medical reasons would face having to take regular tests simply to shop for “basic goods, including food”.

Calendar: The key dates to know as France tightens Covid restrictions

The government, however, seems determined to keep this measure. Spokesman Gabriel Attal said on Monday evening that it had “decided to adapt the wording of this measure in the bill”.

“The article in the bill provides for the extension of the health pass to shopping centres whose surface area exceeds a threshold which will be defined by decree,” he said. The government has proposed the requirement be limited to shopping centres with a surface area of more than 20,000m2.

The court also informed the executive that the planned €45,000 fine for business failing to check visitors’ health passes properly would be disproportionate.

Attal announced that the fines would be reduced to €1,500 for an individual and €9,000 for a legal entity in the first instance. Sanctions rise to a year in prison and a fine of €9,000 euros for individuals in the event of four infringements, with businesses facing a €45,000 fine.

But Attal clarified that fines would not be imposed until after an unspecified ‘run-in’ period.

The Council of State backed a mandatory self-isolation period of 10 days for anyone who tests positive for Covid-19 – but “recommends expressly specifying […] that any checks cannot take place at night”.

Attal later said no compulsory isolation controls will be imposed between 11pm until 8am. 

The court also suggested including an article stating that the isolation period “ceases to apply before the end of the 10-day period if a new test shows that those concerned are no longer positive” for Covid-19.

The bill will be debated in the National Assembly on Wednesday, and in the Senate on Thursday and Friday.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

COVID-19 RULES

End of the pandemic? What the expiry of Sweden’s Covid laws really means

With the expiry of Sweden's two temporary Covid-19 laws, the downgrading of the virus's threat classification, and the end of the last travel restrictions, April, officially at least, marks the end of the pandemic. We explain what it means.

End of the pandemic? What the expiry of Sweden's Covid laws really means

What are the two laws which expire on April 1st? 

Sweden’s parliament voted last week to let the two temporary laws put in place to battle the Covid-19 pandemic expire on April 1st.

The first law is the so-called Covid-19 law, or “the law on special restrictions to limit the spread of the Covid-19 illness”, which was used during the pandemic to temporarily empower the authorities to limit the number of visitors to shops, gyms, and sports facilities. It also gave the government power to limit the number of people who could gather in public places like parks and beaches. 

The second law was the “law on temporary restrictions at serving places”. This gave the authorities, among other things, the power to limit opening times, and force bars and restaurants to only serve seated customers.  

What impact will their expiry have? 

The immediate impact on life in Sweden will be close to zero, as the restrictions imposed on the back of these two laws were lifted months ago. But it does means that if the government does end up wanting to bring back these infection control measures, it will have to pass new versions of the laws before doing so. 

How is the classification of Covid-19 changing? 

The government decided at the start of February that it would stop classifying Covid-19 both as a “critical threat to society” and “a disease that’s dangerous to the public” on April 1st.

These classifications empowered the government under the infectious diseases law that existed in Sweden before the pandemic to impose health checks on inbound passengers, place people in quarantine, and ban people from entering certain areas, among other measures. 

What impact will this change have? 

Now Covid-19 is no longer classified as “a disease that’s dangerous to the public”, or an allmänfarlig sjukdom, people who suspect they have caught the virus, are no longer expected to visit a doctor or get tested, and they cannot be ordered to get tested by a court on the recommendation of an infectious diseases doctor. People with the virus can also no longer be required to aid with contact tracing or to go into quarantine. 

Now Covid-19 is no longer classified as “a critical threat to society”, or samhällsfarlig, the government can no longer order health checks at border posts, quarantine, or ban people from certain areas. 

The end of Sweden’s last remaining Covid-19 travel restrictions

Sweden’s last remaining travel restriction, the entry ban for non-EU arrivals, expired on March 31st.  This means that from April 1st, Sweden’s travel rules return to how they were before the Covid-19 pandemic began. 

No one will be required to show a vaccination or test certificate to enter the country, and no one will be barred from entering the country because their home country or departure country is not deemed to have a sufficiently good vaccination program or infection control measures. 

Does that mean the pandemic is over? 

Not as such. Infection rates are actually rising across Europe on the back of yet another version of the omicron variant. 

“There is still a pandemic going on and we all need to make sure that we live with it in a balanced way,” the Public Health Agency’s director-general, Karin Tegmark Wisell, told SVT

Her colleague Sara Byfors told TT that this included following the “fundamental recommendation to stay home if you are sick, so you don’t spread Covid-19 or any other diseases”. 

SHOW COMMENTS