SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Autobahn speed limits becoming a ‘fetish’, says German Transport Minister

The fierce debate over whether to impose a speed limit on the German Autobahn has continued, with Federal Transport Minister Andreas Scheuer drawing a clear line of defence for the upcoming election campaign.

Autobahn speed limits becoming a 'fetish', says German Transport Minister
New speed limits signs along the Dutch federal motorway. Proponents of a speed limit point to the lower number of accidents in Germany's neighbouring countries. Photo: picture alliance/dpa/ANP | Wilbert Bijzitter

“The argument for a general speed limit is a political instrument of war, for some even a fetish,” the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) politician told DPA. 

“When making a choice, citizens can decide whether they want freedom of mobility – or restrictions and bans. And the Greens are firmly in the latter camp.”

In the run-up to the September 26th election, the spectre of an Autobahn speed limit – which has been a long-standing debate in Germany – has once again reared its head, with the Green Party, the Social Democratic Party and the Left Party all speaking in favour of it.

The German Autobahn is the only stretch of motorway in Europe without a general speed limit, though maximum speeds of 130km (80 miles) per hour are recommended.

A speed limit ‘increases safety’ 

Proponents of a speed limit, such as environmental protection organisation Deutsche Umwelthilfe, argue that in order to achieve the climate targets for 2030, Germany must make substantial savings in CO2 emissions, especially in traffic.

According to them, the measure with the highest potential for savings is a speed limit of 120km per hour – equivalent to just under 75 miles per hour – on motorways such as the Autobahn, 80 km (around 50 miles) per hour outside the city and 30km (around 18 miles) per hour in town.

READ ALSO: Should Germany impose an Autobahn speed limit to fight climate change?

In addition, a speed limit would massively increase road safety and lead to fewer accidents, they claim.

“A speed limit doesn’t cost us consumers a cent – and it increases safety on our roads,” Deutsche Umwelthilfe say on their campaign website.

“More than 400 people die every year on German Autobahns alone, many of them from driving too fast. And with three deaths per 100 kilometres of motorway every year, we are above the values in our neighbouring countries.”


Andreas Scheuer (CSU) claims the general speed limit has become “a political instrument of war.” Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Kay Nietfeld

But Scheuer was firm that a speed limit would have little impact on safety.

“The German Autobahns are the safest roads in the world,” he told DPA. “We tend to have problems with road safety on country roads, that is what our focus must be.”

READ ALSO: Do Germany’s autobahn speed limits save lives (and the planet) or are they overhyped?

‘We rely on innovation’ 

CDU leader and chancellor candidate Armin Laschet has also spoken out against an Autobahn speed-limit in recent weeks, suggesting that innovation rather than new laws would be the answer to the climate crisis.

“Why should an electric vehicle that doesn’t cause CO2 emissions not be allowed to drive faster than 130? That is illogical,” he told the German Editorial Network.

The pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP) have also rejected the idea of the speed limit. 

“We rely on innovation, rationality and freedom,” they say in their campaign manifesto. “A speed limit is neither progressive nor sustainable.”

In his interview with the DPA, Scheuer echoed this view, pointing to developments in intelligent and autonomous cars, which he said would bring the speed limit down anyway.

However, some proponents of the speed limit have pointed out that the proportion of fully electric cars in Germany remains minute in comparison with the number of less environmentally friendly cars on the road.

According to transport expert Giulio Mattioli, just 0.6 percent of cars on German roads are completely electric.

Vocabulary 

Speed limit – (das) Tempolimit

Road safety – (die) Verkehrssicherheit

Transport Minister – (der/die) Verkehrsminister(in) 

Parliamentary election campaign – (der) Bundestagswahlkampf

We’re aiming to help our readers improve their German by translating vocabulary from some of our news stories. Did you find this article useful? Let us know.

Member comments

  1. I would be happy to have a speed limit if it was made consistent. There’s a section outside of Munich miracles within about 5 km from 80 to unlimited to 100 to to unlimited it’s extremely annoying.

    Other countries have a flat limit of 130 unless it’s in construction I think that would be very helpful

  2. Have to laugh a bit when this guy Andreas Scheuer talks about tempolimit as an attack on freedom. If you want to go down that route, there are scores of ways freedom is restricted in Germany. Right down to where you are supposed to deposit your litter. There is always selectivity as to when and where freedom is regulated.

    I know the speed limit freedom lobby like to argue that the road safety record on autobahns is good, even where there is no speed limit. However, I admit to feeling unnerved when I’m overtaken by some BMW hitting 180ks or more. It means you need to keep checking your rear mirror every 3-4 seconds, as when you don’t, you can have an unpleasant shock, even when you were not planning to move lanes.
    I’m a bit sceptical that speed is not a factor in many autobahn accidents. When a car is travelling at high speed, the driver has virtually no time to take evasive action, if the unexpected happens, and the unexpected frequently happens on all roads.

    I remember a woman once telling me she’d rather have an accident at 200ks than 100, as she’d rather be killed outright than be half injured!

  3. The argument about electric vehicles not being limited is ridiculous. The faster you drive, the less mileage achievable and therefore the more frequent the need for recharging and the associated CO2 costs of the recharge. Speed doesn’t necessarily kill. It’s the inappropriate use of speed, the lack of awareness & anticipation and the aggressive nature of many drivers. The argument for unlimited speed is similar to that in the US for continued gun use. The RIGHT to drive at any speed limit is crazy. As a policeman once told me “it’s a LIMIT, not a TARGET.”

  4. One has only to drive in the UK to discover the very dangerous distraction of continual speed camera monitoring. The driver is spending more time concerned about his or her speed, looking at the speedometer then actually being alert to the traffic.
    In Germany the traffic flows, to my mind, better than in anywhere where limits to speed are enforced. The driver concentrates upon driving and is not distracted.
    Yes, there are some that truly speed but from my experience they do not present a danger and by the way, checking your rear view mirrors every few seconds is an exercise we should all practise.
    I feel treated like an adult on German autobahns as opposed to the ‘Nanny State’ of the UK where I am treated like an errant child.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Scandals rock German far right but party faithfuls unmoved

When carpenter Tim Lochner decided to run for mayor in the German city of Pirna, he knew standing for the far-right AfD would give him the best chance of winning.

Scandals rock German far right but party faithfuls unmoved

“My success proves me right,” Lochner told AFP at the town hall in Pirna, a picturesque mountain town with a population of around 40,000 in the former East German state of Saxony.

Surfing on a surge of support for the AfD across Germany, Lochner scored 38.5 percent of the vote against two other candidates in December, making him the AfD’s first city mayor.

Four months later, support for the anti-euro, anti-immigration party has been slipping as it battles multiple controversies.

But Lochner remains convinced the AfD is on a winning streak ahead of June’s European elections and three key regional polls in Germany in September.

People in Pirna are concerned about “petrol prices, energy prices, food prices”, Lochner said.

“People’s wallets are just as empty as they were the day before yesterday,” he said, arguing that voters will therefore continue to turn to the AfD.

Slipping support

The AfD was polling on around 22 percent at the end of last year, seizing on concerns over rising migration, high inflation and a stumbling economy.

READ ALSO: Germany’s far-right AfD denies plan to expel ‘non-assimilated foreigners’

But a recent opinion poll by the Bild daily had the party on just 18 percent as it contends with several scandals involving its members.

In January, an investigation by media group Correctiv indicated members of the AfD had discussed the idea of mass deportations at a meeting with extremists, leading to a huge wave of protests across the country.

More recently, the AfD has been fighting allegations that senior party members were paid to spread pro-Russian positions on a Moscow-financed news website.

And Bjoern Hoecke, one of the party’s most controversial politicians, went on trial this week for publicly using a banned Nazi slogan.

But in spite of everything, the AfD is still polling in second place after the conservatives and ahead of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democratic Party.

It also remains in first place in three former East German states where elections are set to be held in September, including Saxony.

Ruediger Schmitt-Beck, a professor of politics at the University of Mannheim, said the scandals may have swayed some Germans who had seen the party mainly as a protest vote.

“However, the AfD also has a lot of support from people with xenophobic tendencies, right-wing ideological positions and authoritarian attitudes — and they are unlikely to have been affected” by the controversies, he told AFP.

Schmitt-Beck rates the AfD’s chances in the upcoming regional and EU elections as “very good in both cases”.

‘Dissatisfied’

Residents of Pirna are more divided than ever about the party.

READ ALSO: A fight for the youth vote: Are German politicians social media savvy enough?

In the city’s cobbled pedestrian zone, a pensioner who did not want to give her name said she was “glad” to have an AfD mayor “because they address our problems (and) address them honestly”.

Fellow pensioner Brigitte Muenster, 75, said she had not voted for the AfD but she could understand why others had.

Anti AfD activists Fritz Enge (L) and Madeleine Groebe pose for a picture in Pirna

Anti AfD activists Fritz Enge (L) and Madeleine Groebe pose for a picture in Pirna, eastern Germany, on April 8, 2024. (Photo by Femke COLBORNE / AFP)

“People are dissatisfied. More is being done for others than for the people who live here themselves,” she said.

“I’m not a fan, but let’s wait and see,” added Sven Jacobi, a 49-year-old taxi driver. “Just because he’s from the AfD doesn’t mean it has to go badly.”

But not everyone is so accepting of the new mayor.

On the day Lochner was sworn in, around 800 people joined a protest outside the town hall coordinated by SOE Gegen Rechts, an association of young people against the far right.

“I think that when you look at Germany’s history, it should be clear that you should stand up against that and not let it happen again,” said group member Madeleine Groebe, 17.

Fellow activist Fritz Enge, 15, said that with so many scandals coming to light, the AfD was “making its own enemies”.

“The AfD is inhumane. It agitates against homosexuals and migrants, especially on social media, and I totally disagree with that,” he said.

 
 

SHOW COMMENTS