SHARE
COPY LINK

ANGELA MERKEL

‘Too little, too late’: What Germany is saying about the extended lockdown measures

After the federal government and states decided on a hard lockdown over Easter the reactions stretched from media organisations calling it "a scandal" to doctors expressing relief.

'Too little, too late': What Germany is saying about the extended lockdown measures
An anti-lockdown protester. credit: dpa-Zentralbild | Bernd Wüstneck

On Monday evening the government and states decided to impose Germany’s toughest lockdown yet over the five days of Easter, while also bringing curfews into play for areas with high infection rates.

After a day of rumours that contact restrictions could be lifted over the religious holiday, as happened at Christmas time, the announcement came as a shock.

Also included in the new lockdown rules are a night time curfew in hotspots and pledge to increase testing. Here’s what scientists, doctors, politicians, and care home representatives thought of the agreement.

Scientific view: ‘very positive effect’

Dirk Brockmann, an epidemiologist at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) praised the tough Easter restrictions.

“In my opinion, this could have a very positive effect because a whole series of days will basically be Sundays,” Brockmann said on Deutschlandfunk radio on Tuesday morning.

“Of course these measures will have a positive impact, but how strong is very, very difficult to calculate,” he added.

Given that Germany is currently is a state of exponential growth of cases, there could be up to 60,000 new infections every day in Germany without tough restrictions, he said.

Figures released by the RKI on Tuesday show 7,485 new infections, about 2,000 more than a week ago. The nationwide 7-day incidence of new infections per 100,000 inhabitants went up slightly to 108.1.

Asked about the night-time curfew, Brockmann said that “anything that reduces contacts is helpful.”

Praise from ICU doctors

Intensive care doctors have also welcomed the hard shutdown.

“Politicians have recognised that we are in a difficult phase of the pandemic and that we must not jeopardise the success of the vaccination rollout,” the president of the Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Divi), Gernot Marx, said.

The decisions were tough but important, he said. “This is the only way we can slow down the current exponential growth of incidences again – and also the only way we will see fewer patients in intensive care units in a few weeks.”

Stating that the current occupancy of intensive care beds is the same as at the peak of the first wave, he said that “that already worries us a lot, despite all our experience after one year of the pandemic as intensive care specialists.”

SEE ALSO: ‘Chronic overwork of staff’: Germany sees spike in Covid-19 cases

Marx said though that the government needed to offer people a strategy for a return to normality by the summer.

“People who are prepared as a family not to meet over Easter because they know they can meet in the garden in June will help to avoid very serious courses in intensive care units. And that’s all we want,” he said.

Political response: ‘Too little, too late’

Green party health expert Janosch Dahmen called the new rules “too little, too late,” saying “the third wave should be broken now, but instead the shutdown will not come until Easter.”

He added that there was still no clear starting point for providing self-tests in schools, while tests and masks in the workplace were still not compulsory. “In the time between now and Easter, many more people will catch the disease.”

He said that the states had allowed the third wave to grow in momentum by loosening the restrictions without imposing a testing strategy.

“Nationwide rapid testing, accelerated vaccination and consistent, digital contact tracing are urgently needed to finally use smarter methods than the shutdown,” Dahmen argued.

Christian Lindner, leader of the liberal Free Democrats (FDP), said the measures were “too harsh” and “not innovative enough.”

“It shows a staggering lack of strategy that the principle of “we’ll stay at home” is still the central response to the pandemic, even after more than a year,” Lindner told broadcaster WDR5 on Tuesday.

Lindner cited the city of Tübingen, among others, as an example of “very creative concepts”.

READ MORE: Why one German town is lifting its lockdown despite third coronavirus wave

Within the framework of a model project for more opening steps in Corona times, free tests have been available at several stations in the university town for a good week.

With a negative result, one can, for example, go to shops or to the hairdresser. In terms of organisation, the model has worked so far, Tübingen’s mayor Boris Palmer (Greens) said on Monday. However, it is still too early to assess the effect on the number of infections.

‘Mockery’ of care home residents

The German Foundation for Patient Protection has demanded more chances for social contact are provided for people in nursing homes than what was decided by the federal and state governments.

“Merely holding out the prospect of extended visitation opportunities is sheer mockery of those affected,” Eugen Brysch, director of the German Foundation for Patient Protection, told the Deutsche Presse-Agentur on Tuesday. 

At the lockdown summit, the federal and state governments decided that the facilities would be allowed to expand their visitation options and to offer group programmes inside residential areas. The prerequisite is that there is no coronavirus outbreak in the home and that the residents had their vaccination at least two weeks prior.

Brysch welcomed the fact that 90 percent of nursing home residents are now vaccinated. “But for residents, practically nothing has changed in many cases,” he said. “Unregulated visits at Easter are fiction for most.”

Many continue to live with strict visiting and contact restrictions, he said. “For people in institutions, vaccinations have not brought freedom.”

‘A scandal’: What the media thought

Der Spiegel news magazine called the government’s repeated focus on tweaking shutdowns a “scandal”, claiming it had “completely the wrong priorities” and should instead focus on improving its vaccination campaign and test strategy.

“This three-week lockdown rhythm confirms the suspicion that the federal government and states are simply trying to play a catch up game they have already lost,” the conservative daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said, referring to Germany’s continued extension of shutdown measures since the beginning of November 2020.

READ MORE: Almost two-thirds of Germans ‘unsatisfied’ with government’s Covid-19 management

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

COVID-19 RULES

End of the pandemic? What the expiry of Sweden’s Covid laws really means

With the expiry of Sweden's two temporary Covid-19 laws, the downgrading of the virus's threat classification, and the end of the last travel restrictions, April, officially at least, marks the end of the pandemic. We explain what it means.

End of the pandemic? What the expiry of Sweden's Covid laws really means

What are the two laws which expire on April 1st? 

Sweden’s parliament voted last week to let the two temporary laws put in place to battle the Covid-19 pandemic expire on April 1st.

The first law is the so-called Covid-19 law, or “the law on special restrictions to limit the spread of the Covid-19 illness”, which was used during the pandemic to temporarily empower the authorities to limit the number of visitors to shops, gyms, and sports facilities. It also gave the government power to limit the number of people who could gather in public places like parks and beaches. 

The second law was the “law on temporary restrictions at serving places”. This gave the authorities, among other things, the power to limit opening times, and force bars and restaurants to only serve seated customers.  

What impact will their expiry have? 

The immediate impact on life in Sweden will be close to zero, as the restrictions imposed on the back of these two laws were lifted months ago. But it does means that if the government does end up wanting to bring back these infection control measures, it will have to pass new versions of the laws before doing so. 

How is the classification of Covid-19 changing? 

The government decided at the start of February that it would stop classifying Covid-19 both as a “critical threat to society” and “a disease that’s dangerous to the public” on April 1st.

These classifications empowered the government under the infectious diseases law that existed in Sweden before the pandemic to impose health checks on inbound passengers, place people in quarantine, and ban people from entering certain areas, among other measures. 

What impact will this change have? 

Now Covid-19 is no longer classified as “a disease that’s dangerous to the public”, or an allmänfarlig sjukdom, people who suspect they have caught the virus, are no longer expected to visit a doctor or get tested, and they cannot be ordered to get tested by a court on the recommendation of an infectious diseases doctor. People with the virus can also no longer be required to aid with contact tracing or to go into quarantine. 

Now Covid-19 is no longer classified as “a critical threat to society”, or samhällsfarlig, the government can no longer order health checks at border posts, quarantine, or ban people from certain areas. 

The end of Sweden’s last remaining Covid-19 travel restrictions

Sweden’s last remaining travel restriction, the entry ban for non-EU arrivals, expired on March 31st.  This means that from April 1st, Sweden’s travel rules return to how they were before the Covid-19 pandemic began. 

No one will be required to show a vaccination or test certificate to enter the country, and no one will be barred from entering the country because their home country or departure country is not deemed to have a sufficiently good vaccination program or infection control measures. 

Does that mean the pandemic is over? 

Not as such. Infection rates are actually rising across Europe on the back of yet another version of the omicron variant. 

“There is still a pandemic going on and we all need to make sure that we live with it in a balanced way,” the Public Health Agency’s director-general, Karin Tegmark Wisell, told SVT

Her colleague Sara Byfors told TT that this included following the “fundamental recommendation to stay home if you are sick, so you don’t spread Covid-19 or any other diseases”. 

SHOW COMMENTS