SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

Austrian Chancellor Kurz says some EU states have ‘secret’ vaccine contracts

Austria's Chancellor Sebastian Kurz on Friday suggested that some European countries may have signed "secret contracts" with vaccine companies to receive more vaccines than they were entitled to based on EU rules.

Sebastian Kurz
Olivier Fitoussi / POOL / AFP)
EU members have agreed that vaccines should be distributed among countries based on population size, but Sebastian Kurz said that after comparing total procurement between member states, it became clear that “deliveries do not follow the per capita quota system”.
 
Bazaars’ for member states
 
Kurz said there were “bazaars” in which additional agreements between member states and pharmaceutical companies were made. 
 
He said: “Malta will receive three times as many doses per capita as Bulgaria until the end of July. The Netherlands will not only receive more doses of vaccine per capita until the end of June than Germany, but almost twice as many as Croatia.”
 
Kurz concluded this was in “clear contradiction” to the political goals of the EU.
 
 
“There are clues that point to so-called bazaars where additional agreements between member states and pharmaceutical companies were made,” Kurz said.
 
“Malta will receive three times as many doses per capita as Bulgaria until the end of July,” he said.
 
“The Netherlands would not only receive more doses of vaccine per capita until the end of June than Germany, but almost twice as many as Croatia,” Kurz said. “This is in clear contradiction to the political goals of the EU,” he said.
 
Reacting to the comments coming out of Vienna, Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov said he supported the Austrian Chancellor’s initiative “for a close examination of the way in which the vaccines ordered by the European Commission are delivered and distributed”.
 
Borisov, who said he spoke by phone with Kurz on Friday, added that “we must continue in a united manner”, as Brussels has committed to do.
 
But an EU spokesman downplayed the claims of back-room deals.
 
“Member states may decide to ask less or more of a given vaccine, and this is discussed between the member states,” Stefan de Keersmaecker said. “It’s possible in this context, following the outcome of the discussions between the member states, that a new distribution key is agreed upon with the company,” he said.
 
Under Fire
 
The European Unions has come under fire for its sluggish vaccine rollout, which it has blamed on supply and delivery problems.
 
European nations lag behind the United States, Israel and the United Kingdom in terms of the percentage of the population that has already received at least one dose.
 
The Austrian opposition denounced the “”manoeuvre” by Kurz, which it said was aimed at distracting the public’s attention at a time when his government is in “chaos”.
 
“Kurz doesn’t even know that his senior officials are negotiating at the EU,” the opposition Social Democrats (SPOe) joked.
 
Austria does hold a vice-presidency on the relevant EU steering committee who has to agree on the vaccine distribution plans.
 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

Border centres and ‘safe’ states: The EU’s major asylum changes explained

UPDATE: The EU parliament has adopted a sweeping reform of Europe's asylum policies that will both harden border procedures and force all the bloc's 27 nations to share responsibility.

Border centres and 'safe' states: The EU's major asylum changes explained

The parliament’s main political groups overcame opposition from far-right and far-left parties to pass the new migration and asylum pact — enshrining a difficult overhaul nearly a decade in the making.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the vote, saying it will “secure European borders… while ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights” of migrants.

“We must be the ones to decide who comes to the European Union and under what circumstances, and not the smugglers and traffickers,” she said.

EU governments — a majority of which previously approved the pact — also welcomed its adoption.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Greece’s migration minister, Dimitris Kairidis, both called it “historic”.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Europe was acting “effectively and humanely” while Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi hailed what he termed “the best possible compromise”.

But there was dissent when Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban derided the reform as “another nail in the coffin of the European Union”.

“Unity is dead, secure borders are no more. Hungary will never give in to the mass migration frenzy! We need a change in Brussels in order to Stop Migration!” Orban said in a post on social media platform X.

For very different reasons, migrant charities also slammed the pact, which includes building border centres to hold asylum-seekers and sending some to outside “safe” countries.

Amnesty International said the EU was “shamefully” backing a deal “they know will lead to greater human suffering” while the Red Cross federation urged member states “to guarantee humane conditions for asylum seekers and migrants affected”.

The vote itself was initially disrupted by protesters yelling: “The pact kills — vote no!”, while dozens of demonstrators outside the parliament building in Brussels held up placards with slogans decrying the reform.

The parliament’s far-left grouping, which maintains that the reforms are incompatible with Europe’s commitment to upholding human rights, said it was a “dark day”.

It was “a pact with the devil,” said Damien Careme, a lawmaker from the Greens group.

Border centres

As well as Orban, other far-right lawmakers also opposed the passage of the 10 laws making up the pact as insufficient to stop irregular migrants they accuse of spreading insecurity and threatening to “submerge” European identity.

Marine Le Pen, the figurehead of France’s far-right National Rally, complained the changes would give “legal impunity to NGOs complicit with smugglers”.

She and her party’s leader who sits in the European Parliament, Jordan Bardella, said they would seek to overturn the reform after EU elections in June, which are tipped to boost far-right numbers in the legislature.

The pact’s measures are due to come into force in 2026, after the European Commission first sets out how it would be implemented.

New border centres would hold irregular migrants while their asylum requests are vetted. And deportations of those deemed inadmissible would be sped up.

The pact also requires EU countries to take in thousands of asylum-seekers from “frontline” states such as Italy and Greece, or — if they refuse — to provide money or other resources to the under-pressure nations.

Even ahead of Orban’s broadside, his anti-immigration government reaffirmed Hungary would not be taking in any asylum-seekers.

“This new migration pact practically gives the green light to illegal migration to Europe,” Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said before the vote, adding that Budapest “will not allow illegal migrants to set foot here in Hungary”.

‘EU solidarity’

German’s Scholz said on X that the accord stands for “solidarity among European states” and would “finally relieve the burden on those countries that are particularly hard hit”.

One measure particularly criticised by migrant charities is the sending of asylum-seekers to countries outside the EU deemed “safe”, if the migrant has sufficient ties to that country.

The pact resulted from years of arduous negotiations spurred by a massive inflow of irregular migrants in 2015, many from war-torn Syria and Afghanistan.

Under current EU rules, the arrival country bears responsibility for hosting and vetting asylum-seekers and returning those deemed inadmissible. That has put southern frontline states under pressure and fuelled far-right opposition.

A political breakthrough came in December when a weighted majority of EU countries backed the reforms — overcoming opposition from Hungary and Poland.

In parallel with the reform, the EU has been multiplying the same sort of deal it struck with Turkey in 2016 to stem migratory flows.

It has reached accords with Tunisia and, most recently, Egypt that are portrayed as broader cooperation arrangements. Many lawmakers have, however, criticised the deals.

SHOW COMMENTS