SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden’s new foreign policy declaration

Covid-19 has put Sweden's relationships with Denmark and Norway under strain, and Foreign Minister Ann Linde hopes to deepen Sweden's relationship with the UK post Brexit. Here are the main takeaways from this week's foreign policy declaration.

EXPLAINED: What you need to know about Sweden's new foreign policy declaration
Sweden's Foreign Minister Ann Linde in parliament on Wednesday. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

What is the 'foreign policy declaration'? 

Every year, Sweden's foreign minister makes a 'foreign policy declaration', or utrikesdeklaration, to parliament, spelling out the foreign ministry's view of the current global situation and laying out Sweden's priorities. 

What did Foreign Minister Ann Linde have to say about Sweden's neighbours? 

She said: “Nordic cooperation is important but has been sorely tested during the Covid-19 pandemic.”

This is the latest in a series of diplomatic rebukes from Sweden to Norway and Denmark, first over their decision to impose border controls on Sweden in March, and then over their refusal to remove controls until the level of infection in Sweden, and later in individual Swedish regions, fell below a certain level. 

At the same time, she singled out Finland as the country where Sweden's military cooperation needed to be tightest.

What about Brexit? 

Linde hailed the trade agreement reached between the EU and the UK at the end of December as providing “the foundation for an important future partnership”, but she said the government hoped for closer links. 

She said that Sweden intended to “deepen Sweden's and the EU's relationship with the UK, even in foreign and security policy”.

What was the latest message on the prospect of membership of the Nato alliance? 

Linde asserted Sweden's commitment to mutual defence and assistance. 

“Sweden will not remain passive if a catastrophe or attack hit another EU or Nordic country, and we expect these countries to act in the same way if Sweden is affected. We should therefore be able to give and take support, both civil and military.” 

But she reiterated Sweden's neutrality, and said the government was not interested in joining Nato. 

“Our military non-alignment serves us well and contributes to stability and security in northern Europe,” she said. 

But she said the country would continue with its “active, broad and responsible” security politics, which would include “deepened defence cooperation, in particular with Finland”. 

What are Sweden's plans for its year chairing the OCSE? 

Sweden is this year chairing the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, which was originally set up to build cooperation between Western Europe and the Soviet bloc. 

She said that Sweden would seek to improve the security situation in the bloc, and increase the emphasis on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and would also prioritise women, peace and security. 


The Swedish parliament now advises politicians to wear face masks in parliament, except when speaking. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

Which countries did Linde have the toughest messages for? 

The declaration's toughest words were directed at Russia and Belarus, with more diplomatically expressed criticisms also made towards the human rights failings of China and Turkey. 

“Russia's aggression against Ukraine, and the illegal annexation of Crimea is unacceptable. These crimes under international law undermine European security and are the motivation for continuing sanctions against Russia,” she said. 

She also said that Sweden viewed the “negative trend” for human rights and civil society in Russia with “great concern”, saying that the country condemned both “crimes against international rights and poisoning attacks”, a clear reference to the poisoning of regime critic Alexei Navalny. 

As for Belarus, Linde said that the “rigged election and the brutal abuse” that the country's government had carried out was “unacceptable”, saying that this explained the sanctions currently in place. 

When it came to China, she said that the country's “international significance” meant that it concerned Sweden's national interest “to an ever greater extent”. 

At the same time, she said she viewed the “shrinking democratic space in Hong Kong” with “especially great concern”. 

“The freedoms and human rights of Hongkongers must be respected,” she said. 

She recognised Turkey's “central role for the EU”, but said Sweden would support “democratic forces” in Turkey, and be “outspoken in our criticism of crimes against human rights”.

What about Sweden's feminist foreign policy?

Linde reaffirmed the country's commitment to the feminist foreign policy launched by her predecessor Margot Wallström, saying it was “more important than in a long time”, pointing out that Sweden was leading a global coalition for economic equality, and would make women's rights an important theme in its chairmanship of the OCSE.

What about the environment?

With the US rejoining the Paris Agreement, and the United Nations Climate Change Conference in November, there was relatively little on the environment.

Linde did say that Sweden would campaign to strengthen “the link between the Paris agreement and trade”, so that Sweden's trade policy works towards meeting the goals of the Paris agreement. As part of this, she said Sweden would push for “more ambitious” sustainability clauses in the EU's free trade agreements.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS