SHARE
COPY LINK

POLICE

Is France really planning to create police files on political activists?

Changes to France's system of creating police files on potential threats to national security have sparked concern - here is what is happening.

Is France really planning to create police files on political activists?
What is contained in the changes to France's security dossier system? Photo: AFP

What is the change?

The controversy centres on three decrees published by the Interior Ministry concerning the way that police compile files on people who are believed to be a threat to national security.

Specifically, they broaden the type of information that can be recorded on certain types of police file – previously this was limited to a person's activities, now it can include their online and social media activity, as well as more personal information like their political and religious beliefs and membership of organisations including trade unions.

Concerns about mental health can also be recorded on the file.

The three decrees published contain the same changes, but for three different types of file – Pasp security files collected by the national police, Gipasp security files collected by gendarmes and EASP which are the files collated on civil servants before appointment to sensitive roles.

How does France's security dossier system work?

France has a national database called the Fichier des Personnes Recherchées (FPR), which is a database of wanted criminals or people on watchlists that was created in 1969.

This database also contains details of escaped prisoners, people who have escaped from institutions or people barred from entering the country.

The most well-known part of the system is the Fiche S security dossiers – where the letter S stands for 'state security' – and there are different types of Fiches S, with numbers going from S1 to S16.

Around 70 percent of Fiches S are made by the DGSI, the national intelligence service.

The term is most commonly used in relation to terror suspects, but Fiche S is not only for suspected terrorists – football hooligans can also have a Fiches S or radical environmental activists, even if they are non-violent.

In October 2020, the French interior ministry said there were 22,000 people with a Fiche S, of which 8,000 were for radicalisation.

The security dossiers are so well known that they have entered everyday language, with people who are the subject of the files known as fiché S, for example Le terroriste arrêté est fiché S depuis quelques années (The arrested terrorist had been on a watchlist for several years).

Who do the changes refer to?

The expanded information gathering does not cover everyone within the system, only those judged “likely to harm the fundamental interests of the Nation”, “the integrity of the Nation or the institutions of the Republic” or to constitute a “terrorist threat”.

Critics say the first two definitions are too vague and could lead to increased data collection on people engaged in lawful and peaceful opposition to the government.

Who is worried?

Several trade unions, a professional body representing lawyers and Amnesty have all raised concerns about the changes.

Their concerns are twofold; first that the definition of people constituting a threat is too vague and second that the dossiers are moving away from recording activities into opinions, health data and perfectly legitimate activities like membership of a trade union.

 

Anne-Sophie Simpère, Amnesty France's Advocacy Officer, wrote: “Previously, political, philosophical, religious or trade union activities could be recorded. Now, opinions are enough.” 

The CGT, FO and FSU unions and the left-leaning lawyers' and magistrates' unions Syndicat de la magistrature and Syndicat des avocats de France have denounced “the spectre of Big Brother in 2021” in an appeal they filed before the Conseil d'Etat.

What happens next 

The decrees were published in the Journal officiel at the beginning of December and were challenged by unions before France's Conseil d'Etat (State Council) which scrutinises new legislation and acts as an arbitrator in disputes between the government and members of the public.

READ ALSO EXPLAINED What is France's State Council?

After reviewing the decrees, the Council on Monday ruled in the government's favour, saying that the decrees do not disproportionately infringe on freedom of opinion, conscience and religion or trade union freedom.

Are there any safeguards in the system?

Yes, there is an independent body which oversees the files, the Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (Cnil).

Cnil provides oversight on how the information is used. A Fiche S can only be kept for two years before it must be reviewed and if necessary renewed – if during that time the person has kept a low profile the file is destroyed.

Cnil has gives its approval to the new decrees, although it requested clarification on the definitions of people defined as a threat.

 

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

France on alert for social media disinformation ahead of European polls

France has urged social media platforms to increase monitoring of disinformation online in the run-up to the European Parliament elections, a minister has said.

France on alert for social media disinformation ahead of European polls

Jean-Noel Barrot, minister for Europe at the foreign ministry, said two elements could possibly upset the poll on June 9: a high rate of abstentions and foreign interference.

His warning comes as French officials have repeatedly cautioned over the risk of disinformation — especially from Russia after its invasion of Ukraine — interfering with the polls.

To fight absenteeism, France is launching a vast media campaign to encourage its citizens to get out and vote.

As for disinformation, a new government agency mandated to detect disinformation called VIGINUM is on high alert, Barrot said.

The junior minister said he had urged the European Commission to help ensure social media platforms “require the greatest vigilance during the campaign period, the electoral silence period and on the day of the vote”.

He added he would be summoning representatives of top platforms in the coming days “so that they can present their action plan in France… to monitor and regulate” content.

VIGINUM head Marc-Antoine Brillant said disinformation had become common during elections.

“Since the mid-2010s, not a single major poll in a liberal democracy has been spared” attempts to manipulate results, he said.

“The year 2024 is a very particular one… with two major conflicts ongoing in Ukraine and Gaza which, by their nature, generate a huge amount of discussion and noise on social media” and with France hosting the Olympics from July, he said.

All this makes the European elections “particularly attractive for foreign actors and the manipulation of information,” he said.

Barrot mentioned the example of Slovakia, where September parliamentary elections were “gravely disturbed during the electoral silence period by the dissemination of a fake audio recording” targeting a pro-EU candidate.

A populist party that was critical of the European Union and NATO won and has since stopped military aid to Ukraine to fight off Russian forces.

SHOW COMMENTS