SHARE
COPY LINK

COURT

Alleged anti-refugee militants go on trial in Germany

Alleged supporters of a far-right militant group went on trial in Germany on Monday accused of taking part in attacks against officials, refugees and anti-fascist activists.

Alleged anti-refugee militants go on trial in Germany
The group went on trial in Dresden on Monday. Photo: DPA

As fears grow that the country's far-right scene is becoming more emboldened and violent, prosecutors said the four defendants were members or supporters of the “Freital group”.

Based in a town of the same name in Germany's ex-communist east, it had sought to create “a climate of fear” at the height of an influx of migrants to Germany in 2015, they told the regional superior court in Dresden.

Members are believed to have taken part in attacks that year on the car of a local councillor, the office of a leftist politician and a refugee shelter.

The trial of three men and a woman is scheduled to last until next year.

Two of the men, aged 27 and 53, are accused of “membership of a terrorist organisation”.

The other two, both aged 31, face charges including being accessories of crimes carried out by the group, based in a town of the same name in Germany's ex-communist east.

The same court in March 2018 jailed eight members of the Freital group on terrorism and attempted murder charges. Prosecutors say the current group of defendants belong to a “second tier” of members.

READ ALSO: From the NSU to anti-Semitic attacks – how racist and far-right terror in Germany is rising

Resentment runs deep in Saxony state, a hotbed of far-right activity, over Merkel's liberal refugee policy that led to the arrival of more than a million asylum seekers since 2015.

While Merkel's stance at the time enjoyed broad support across much of the political spectrum, it has since been seized on by the far right to radicalise its supporters.

The latest trial comes just a year after the murder of local pro-migrant politician Walter Lübcke in the western city of Kassel, allegedly by a neo-Nazi.

In October 2019, just months after Lübcke's death, Germany was rocked by a shooting at a synagogue in the eastern city of Halle that left two dead. The suspect later admitted to anti-Semitic and far-right motives.

And in February this year, another gunman shot dead nine people of migrant origin in the central town of Hanau.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COURT

French court orders Twitter to reveal anti-hate speech efforts

A French court has ordered Twitter to give activists full access to all its documents relating to efforts to combat racism, sexism and other forms of hate speech on the social network.

French court orders Twitter to reveal anti-hate speech efforts
Photo: Alastair Pike | AFP

Six anti-discrimination groups had taken Twitter to court in France last year, accusing the US social media giant of “long-term and persistent” failures in blocking hateful comments from the site.

The Paris court ordered Twitter to grant the campaign groups full access to all documents relating to the company’s efforts to combat hate speech since May 2020. The ruling applies to Twitter’s global operation, not just France.

Twitter must hand over “all administrative, contractual, technical or commercial documents” detailing the resources it has assigned to fighting homophobic, racist and sexist discourse on the site, as well as “condoning crimes against humanity”.

The San Francisco-based company was given two months to comply with the ruling, which also said it must reveal how many moderators it employs in France to examine posts flagged as hateful, and data on the posts they process.

The ruling was welcomed by the Union of French Jewish Students (UEJF), one of the groups that had taken the social media giant to court.

“Twitter will finally have to take responsibility, stop equivocating and put ethics before profit and international expansion,” the UEJF said in a statement on its website.

Twitter’s hateful conduct policy bans users from promoting violence, or threatening or attacking people based on their race, religion, gender identity or disability, among other forms of discrimination.

Like other social media businesses it allows users to report posts they believe are hateful, and employs moderators to vet the content.

But anti-discrimination groups have long complained that holes in the policy allow hateful comments to stay online in many cases.

French prosecutors on Tuesday said they have opened an investigation into a wave of racist comments posted on Twitter aimed at members of the country’s national football team.

The comments, notably targeting Paris Saint-Germain star Kylian Mbappe, were posted after France was eliminated from the Euro 2020 tournament last week.

France has also been having a wider public debate over how to balance the right to free speech with preventing hate speech, in the wake of the controversial case of a teenager known as Mila.

The 18-year-old sparked a furore last year when her videos, criticising Islam in vulgar terms, went viral on social media.

Thirteen people are on trial accused of subjecting her to such vicious harassment that she was forced to leave school and was placed under police protection.

While President Emmanuel Macron is among those who have defended her right to blaspheme, left-wing critics say her original remarks amounted to hate speech against Muslims.

SHOW COMMENTS