SHARE
COPY LINK

RACISM

Protests force Switzerland to grapple with its own ‘George Floyd’ case

George Floyd's shocking death in police custody in the US has sparked belated soul-searching in Switzerland over the death of a Nigerian man two years ago in Lausanne in similar circumstances.

Protests force Switzerland to grapple with its own ‘George Floyd’ case
Protests in the Swiss city of Lausanne. Photo: FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP

The images of Floyd's last agonising moments have circled the globe, sparking massive protests worldwide.

The 46-year-old black man died in Minneapolis on May 25 after a white officer, who has since been charged with murder, pressed his knee on his neck for nearly nine minutes.

In contrast, the death of Mike Ben Peter, a 37-year-old Nigerian man, in Lausanne in March 2018 received little attention beyond the western Swiss city, where it sparked a small demonstration against police violence.

But the global outcry over Floyd's death has pushed the Swiss to re-examine their own strikingly similar case.

Ben Peter died following a violent arrest after he refused a police search.

IN PICTURES: Powerful images from anti-racism protests across Switzerland

In the encounter, involving six police officers, he was pinned to the ground, on his stomach, according to his family's lawyer Simon Ntah. 

'Enormous similarities' 

“He was held in positional asphyxia” for several minutes, Ntah told AFP. Ben Peter died in hospital a few hours later after suffering a heart attack.

The lawyer said he believed there were “enormous similarities” with Floyd's killing, adding though that the situation was likely “a bit more serious in Ben Peter's case, due to the violence that preceded him being pinned down on his stomach”.

But the main difference, he said, “is that in the US case, the facts were filmed and we can thereby see exactly how the knee was placed on the neck.”

Two years on, Ben Peter's death is still under investigation. In a coincidence of timing, Swiss medical examiners were questioned about their findings in the Ben Peter case just hours after Floyd's death.

They are due to face further questioning before a likely trial, at the end of this year or in 2021.

Landing in the midst of the Floyd outrage, the medical examiners' testimony sent shockwaves through the wealthy Alpine nation.

Protests in the Swiss city of Lausanne. Photo: FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP

Leading newspapers declared that “Switzerland too has its George Floyd”, while protesters at anti-racism demonstrations in several Swiss cities shouted the two men's names in unison.

“Fight for Mike Ben Peter”, read one of the protest posters in Lausanne.

Odile Pelet, a lawyer representing one of the police officers in the case, meanwhile rejects the “conflation” of the facts in the two cases, stressing that the autopsy formally excluded that Ben Peter died from asphyxiation.

“The images of George Floyd's arrest show that the situations are absolutely not comparable,” she told AFP.

“Never did any of the six police officers place their knee on Ben Peter's neck.”

The medical examiners concluded that a range of factors contributed to his death, including stress, obesity and heart problems.

They also mentioned the position he was held in, on his stomach, she acknowledged, “but without being able to really determine what role it may have played in his death”.

Jean-Christophe Sauterel, head of the regional police force in the canton of Vaud, where Lausanne is located, meanwhile said he could not comment on a case still under investigation.

Similar to #MeToo 

But he stressed that in Switzerland, police can apply pressure to a person's arms or shoulders to bring them under control, but putting pressure on the head or neck is “totally forbidden”.

In recent demonstrations in Switzerland against police brutality and racism, Ben Peter has not been the only name mentioned alongside Floyd.

Protesters and Swiss media recall that Herve Manbdundu and Lamine Fatty also died during or following police interventions in Vaud in 2017 and 2016 respectively.

“In the same way that the #MeToo movement has opened the way for very, very positive developments, there is today a movement of awareness raising when it comes to police racism,” Ntah said.

Many observers, including Amnesty International, meanwhile maintain that systemic racism does not exist in Swiss police forces.

But “racial profiling unfortunately remains a widespread police practice,” Nadia Boehlen, a spokeswoman for Amnesty's Swiss chapter, told AFP.

Frederic Maillard, an analyst of policing practices, also said Switzerland does not have a problem with “racist and violent police”, pointing out that the hierarchy demands a “measured” approach.

However, he warned, as elsewhere, police have a tendency to cover for colleagues' bad behaviour, and “there is too little behavioural training to prevent abuses and excesses on the ground”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

RACISM

Swiss parliament wants ban on extremist symbols

Swiss lawmakers on Wednesday voted in favour of banning the display of extremist and racist symbols, starting with those of a Nazi nature.

Swiss parliament wants ban on extremist symbols

The National Council lower house of parliament voted by 133 to 38 in favour of banning the public use of racist, violence-promoting and extremist symbols, such as Nazi symbols.

Switzerland, which stayed neutral during World War II, has come under pressure to fall in line with a number of other European countries in banning Nazi symbols.

Full bans are in place in Germany, Poland and several other eastern European nations.

The Swiss parliament as a whole is now in favour, after the Council of States upper house voted for such a ban in December.

The plans would also cover gestures, words, salutes or flags.

The National Council also voted by 132 to 40 for the measures to be introduced in stages — a move the government supports.

A ban on easily identifiable Nazi symbols could be implemented quickly, while other racist and extremist symbols could be identified and banned further down the line.

“We don’t want a swastika or a Hitler salute in our country, ever!” said Green lawmaker Raphael Mahaim.

“Today, in Switzerland, it is possible, it is even permitted, to display a flag with a swastika on your balcony. It is possible to put a flag bearing the image of the SS on the windshield of your car. It is possible to give the Hitler salute in public spaces.

“This situation is intolerable.”

Debate on other symbols 

Justice minister Beat Jans said the government, called the Federal Council, had hitherto relied on prevention as the main pillar against racism, but now thinks legal measures are needed.

“Anti-Semitic incidents, particularly those involving the use of Nazi symbols, have increased sharply in recent times,” he said.

“Against this background, the Federal Council decided last week that it is positive about the gradual implementation of the motion.”

He said the government wanted to introduce a special law which would mean fines could therefore be imposed.

As for banning Nazi symbols first, Mahaim accepted that debates on other symbols “will be much more difficult”.

“For example, what about the Z symbol of Putin’s army of aggression? What about the Ku Klux Klan symbol? What about the hammer and sickle symbol?” he said.

The no votes and abstentions all came from the hard-right Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which is the largest faction in the lower chamber.

SVP lawmaker Barbara Steinemann said Switzerland had successfully been able to keep extremism down to “a base of a few meaningless weirdos”.

She said a ban on symbols would not prevent the “rampant” anti-Semitic attitudes in universities and “intellectual milieus”.

Steinemann said Nazi symbolism had risen only since the Gaza war erupted in October, and “even if you don’t like to hear it, this is the influence of immigration from non-European cultures.

“We are literally engaging in symbolic politics, and we shouldn’t be doing that,” the Zurich lawmaker said.

SHOW COMMENTS