SHARE
COPY LINK

CRIME

Explained: Why the killing of Sweden’s prime minister 34 years ago is back in the news today

Has Sweden found the person who killed the prime minister 34 years ago? As the prosecutor working on the investigation reports that the case could soon be closed, we explain what you need to know about the case and why it's back in the headlines.

Explained: Why the killing of Sweden's prime minister 34 years ago is back in the news today
Will Sweden's longest running murder investigation soon come to a close? Photo: Tobbe Gustavsson/TT/Scanpix

Why are we talking about this now?

The long-running investigation into the murder of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme may reach a conclusion as soon as this summer, the chief prosecutor on the case told public broadcaster SVT.

“I am optimistic about being able to present what happened with the murder and who is responsible for it,” prosecutor Krister Petersson said on the programme Veckans Brott, but did not say whether he believed he would bring charges against the suspect. 

This could mean that Petersson believes the person responsible has since died, or it may be that the investigation will be closed.

And another reason that the case is back in the news is because, well, it's never really been out of it. New theories, potential suspects and comment on the investigation have been in the tabloids regularly for decades now. The fact that the anniversary of the murder is approaching at the end of the month is another factor.

What do I need to know about the Palme murder?

Olof Palme was killed on February 28th, 1986, after leaving a cinema in Stockholm and was walking home with his wife Lisbet. Palme tried to live a normal life in many ways, which included often going out without bodyguards, and on the night in question he had dismissed his bodyguards for the evening before making the cinema plans with his wife and son.

After saying goodnight to their son and his partner, the couple began their journey home. An attacker approached them and shot Palme from behind, as well as grazing Lisbet with a second bullet. Although passersby tried to revive the 59-year-old leader, it was later found that he had died almost immediately.

The shocking nature of the murder has been described as a turning point in the national psyche, marking the first murder of a politician in Sweden. 

What else should I know about Olof Palme?

Palme led the Social Democrat Party and had two stints as prime minister. He was best known as an excellent speaker, and an impromptu speech he gave on holiday in Gotland laid the foundations for Almedalen Week, today the country's major political festival. His debating style was viewed by some as aggressive or arrogant, and his outspoken nature caused disagreements with many, including due to his criticism of the US over the Vietnam War.

In Sweden, he introduced many of the policies that are today synonymous with the country's welfare state, overseeing the introduction of paid parental leave, universal daycare, and the right to free abortion. 

Palme was survived by his wife, Lisbet, who died in 2018, and their three children.


Palme speaking at Almedalen in Visby, Gotland. Photo: Andi Loor / SvD / TT

What's happened in the investigation since his murder?

Huge efforts have been made to track down the killer. More than 10,000 people have been interviewed and over 130 have claimed responsibility for the murder.

Police were criticized for their actions in the early stages of the investigation, including failing to cordon off the scene promptly, which could have meant potential forensic evidence was destroyed. The bullets were found by a member of the public, and the gun used in the murder was never found.

Prosecutor Krister Petersson has been leading the so-called Palme Group since 2017, which today consists of him and four police officers.

Over the years, there have been many theories about what may have happened, which have suggested both individuals and groups as potential perpetrators.

A man named Christer Pettersson, who had a previous conviction for manslaughter, was in 1988 convicted of the murder after Lisbet Palme identified him in a lineup. But he was later acquitted by a court of appeal, and died in 2004.

How are people reacting to the new statements?

Palme expert Gunnar Wall told TT that the statements were “surprising”.

He added: “If the Chief Prosecutor is now close to a solution, Sweden might be able to put the murder behind it. Most would be pleased about that. If there are no big questions left to answer, the murder will be put to rest among other historical events. [But] The answer may include things that raise more questions.”

However, professor Kjell Östberg noted: “If it is found that it has been possible to solve the murder after almost 35 years but has not been done before, I think many will ask why it has taken so long.”


Mourners and members of the public at the scene of the murder. Photo: Lasse Hedberg/TT/Scanpix

And what will happen next?

Sweden removed the statute of limitations for murder cases back in 2010, partly so that the Palme investigation could continue.

But if the chief prosecutor's comments were accurate, the investigation will either be closed this year, or charges will be brought against the suspect if they are still alive.
 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

CRIME

EXPLAINED: What we know about the attack on a Swedish anti-fascist meeting

Several masked men, described by anti-racism magazine Expo as "a group of Nazis" carried out the attack at an event organised by the Left Party and Green Party. Here's what we know so far.

EXPLAINED: What we know about the attack on a Swedish anti-fascist meeting

What happened?

Several masked men burst into a Stockholm theatre on Wednesday night and set off smoke bombs during an anti-fascism event, according to police and participants.

Around 50 people were taking part in the event at the Moment theatre in Gubbängen, a southern suburb of the Swedish capital, organised by the Left Party and the Green Party.

“Three people were taken by ambulance to hospital,” the police said on its website, shortly after the attack.

According to Swedish media, one person was physically assaulted and two had paint sprayed in their faces.

“The Nazis attacked visitors using physical violence, with pepper spray, and vandalised the venue before throwing in some kind of smoke grenade which filled the foyer with smoke,” Expo wrote on its website

The magazine’s head of education Klara Ljungberg was at the event in order to hold a lecture at the invitation of the two political parties.

What was the meeting about?

According to the Left Party’s press officer, the event was “a meeting about growing fascism”. 

Left Party leader Nooshi Dadgostar described the event to public broadcaster SVT as an “open event, for equality among individuals”.

As well as Ljungberg from Expo, panelists at the event included anti-fascist activist Mathias Wåg, who also writes for Swedish centre-left tabloid Aftonbladet.

“They were determined and went straight for me,” Wåg told Expo just after the attack. “I received a few blows but nothing that caused serious damage.”

“I was invited to be on a panel in order to discuss anti-fascism with representatives from the Left Party and the Green Party,” he told the magazine. “I didn’t know this was going to happen, but there’s obviously a risk when Expo and I are in the same place.”

What has the reaction been like?

All of Sweden’s parties across the political spectrum have denounced the attack, with Dadgostar describing it as a “threat to our democracy” when TT newswire interviewed her at the theatre a few hours after the attack occurred.

Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, from the conservative Moderates, called the attack “abhorrent”.

The Moderates, Christian Democrats and Liberals are currently in government with the support of the far-right Sweden Democrats, while the Social Democrats, Left Party, Centre Party and Green Party are in opposition.

“It is appalling news that a meeting hosted by the Left Party has been stormed,” Kristersson told TT. “I have reached out to Nooshi Dadgostar and expressed my deepest support. This type of abhorrent action has no place in our free and open society.”

“Right-wing extremists want to scare us into silence,” Social Democrat leader Magdalena Andersson wrote on X. “They will never be allowed to succeed.”

“The attack by right-wing extremists at a political meeting is a direct attack on our democracy and freedom of speech,” Green Party co-leader Daniel Helldén wrote on X. “My thoughts are with those who were affected this evening.”

Sweden Democrat party leader Jimmie Åkesson wrote in an email to TT that “political violence is terrible, in all its forms, and does not belong in Sweden.”

“All democratic forces must stand in complete solidarity against all kinds of politically motivated violence,” he continued.

His party has previously admitted to being founded by people from “fascist movement” New Swedish Movement, skinheads, and people with “various types of neo-Nazi contact”.

“It is an attack not only on the Left Party, Green Party and the Expo Foundation, but also on our entire democratic society,” Centre Party leader Muharrem Demirok, who referred to the attackers as “Nazis”, wrote on social media. “Those affected have all my support.”

Christian Democrat leader Ebba Busch and Liberal leader Johan Pehrson both referred to the attackers as “anti-democratic forces”.

“It is never acceptable for a political meeting to be stormed by anti-democratic forces,” Busch wrote. “There is no place for this in our society.”

“Anti-democratic forces like this represent a serious threat to our democracy and must be met with society’s hardest iron fist,” Pehrson said.

What about the attackers? Has anyone been arrested?

Not yet. The police had not made any arrests at the time of writing on Thursday morning.

According to TT, police did not want to comment on who could be behind the attack.

It is currently being investigated as a violation of the Flammable and Explosive Goods Act, assault, causing danger to others and disturbing public order.

SHOW COMMENTS