SHARE
COPY LINK

UN

Norway ranked world’s top nation for ‘human development’

The Human Development Report 2019 has placed Norway as the leading country in the world.

Norway ranked world’s top nation for 'human development'
Photo: tan4ikk/Depositphotos

The annual report takes into account factors including life expectancy at birth, expected years of schooling, mean total years of schooling, and gross national income per capita.

A product of these factors is used to calculate a country’s Human Development Index (HDI).

Norway’s overall score on the index was 0.954, moving it from number 5 on the 2018 index to number 1 in 2019.

The Nordic nation was also ranked first in 2017.

Switzerland, Ireland, Germany and Hong Kong (SAR) took the remaining top five places on the index. Nordic neighbours Sweden and Denmark were placed 8th and 11th respectively.

The report also finds that Norway’s HDI score has grown consistently in the long term, with a 0.41 percent increase in the index since 1990 and a 0.16 percent increase since 2010.

But the increase for the current decade was smaller as a function than that for the 2000s, when the HDI grew by 0.27 percent.

Norway was also found to have low inequality. The country retained its placed as the highest-ranked nation in the UN development index after each nation’s HDI score was adjusted for inequality.

“In Norway, Spain, France and Croatia… the bottom 40 percent (of earners) saw their incomes grow at a rate similar to that of the average income,” the report notes.

However, in Norway and France, “the top 1 percent of incomes grew more than the average, meaning that the income share of the groups in between was squeezed,” it added.

The country ranked top of the index for gender development, meanwhile, despite a notable difference in estimated gross national income per capita for men and women.

The HDI for Norway, classified by gender, was 0.946 for women and 0.955 for men.

“While Norway is pleased to top the list, the countries that are at the top must do more to help those at the bottom,” Minister of International Development Dag-Inge Ulstein told news agency NTB.

“For the first time in world history, we have a real opportunity to eradicate all extreme poverty in the world. But after a long period of progress, we now see that the arrows are pointing downwards for many of the poorest countries. Right now. we are not on track to achieve the sustainability goals by 2030. The clock is ticking,” the minister added.

Those views appear to be supported by the overall conclusions of the report, which state that “two children born in 2000 in countries with different levels of human development will have vastly different prospects for adult life”.

“The wave of demonstrations sweeping across countries is a clear sign that, for all our progress, something in our globalized society is not working,” United Nations Development Programme administrator Achim Steiner said via the UNDP website.

READ ALSO: How Norway's schools compare to other countries in global ranking

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

UN

Why hasn’t peace-loving Norway signed up to UN nuclear weapons ban?

The UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons, backed by 51 states, enters into force on Friday, but why hasn't peace loving Norway signed up to the landmark international agreement?

Why hasn't peace-loving Norway signed up to UN nuclear weapons ban?
Norwegian PM Erna Solberg at the UN in 2019. File photo: AFP

Some 51 states around the world have backed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which calls for the ban of “nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices”, according to the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs.

The treaty includes a ban on “developing, testing, producing, acquiring, possessing, stockpiling, use or threatening to use nuclear weapons.”

And with over 50 ratifications, the treaty is finally due to come into force on Friday.

It was adopted by the UN General Assembly in July of 2017, with the approval of 122 countries.

Norway, however, was not among them.

And in those three years, little has rocked Prime Minister Erna Solberg and the government’s belief that joining the treaty is the wrong course for the Nordic country.

But why?

NATO ally

“We will not support a proposal that would weaken NATO,” PM Solberg said in a 2017-interview to broadcaster NRK.

She argued that until nuclear powers themselves commit to abolish nuclear weapons, joining the treaty was pointless.

“As long as countries with nuclear capabilities exist, NATO will possess nuclear capabilities,” she added.

Norway’s position was confirmed in March 2019, when Parliament voted against committing the country to the treaty.

Existential Threat

The choice has received widespread criticism from among others the President of Red Cross Norway, General Robert Mood.

“We have a much larger room to manoeuvre within NATO than we are currently utilising,” Mood wrote in an opinion piece in Aftenposten in September 2020.

He argues that nuclear weapons pose a significant threat to global peace and security. He also points out that six former Norwegian Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers are among the 56 world leaders who have petitioned world governments to ratify the Nuclear Ban-Treaty in an open letter by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN).

ICAN was key in the development of the Nuclear Ban-Treaty, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its efforts in 2017. In order to put pressure on national governments to join the treaty, ICAN also launched their Cities Appeal-initiative. Over 40 Norwegian cities and municipalities have joined the appeal, including Oslo, Bergen and Trondheim.

No Effect

Yet Norway’s position continues to be staunchly in-line with that of NATO, which recently emphasised its opposition to the treaty.

The treaty “does not reflect the increasingly challenging international security environment and is at odds with the existing non-proliferation and disarmament architecture,” the security alliance wrote in a December statement.

The ban treaty “lacks any rigorous or clear mechanisms for verification, and has not been signed by any state that possesses nuclear weapons, and thus will not result in the elimination of a single nuclear weapon,” NATO continued.

Norway’s government also reviewed the consequences of joining the treaty in 2018. It concluded that the alliance could be weakened if member countries started committing to the ban-treaty.

“This would primarily serve the interests of countries that pose a security threat to Norway and other NATO members,” it stated.

Lack of Mechanisms 

Norway is not the only Nordic country hesitant to join the treaty. In fact, neither Sweden, Denmark, Finland or Iceland support an internationally binding ban.

For Sweden, this has come as a surprise as it was among the countries that voted in favour of the treaty in the UN General Assembly in 2017. The country is furthermore not a member of NATO.

Yet the country has also highlighted that the nuclear ban treaty lacks clear definitions regarding which weapons it covers.

“I would have wished we had a convention that is possible to sign, but you also have to be a realist,” Sweden’s then-Foreign Minister Margot Wallström said about the ban-treaty in 2019.

Conflict with the Non-Proliferation Treaty

Wallström and NATO have also pointed out that it is unclear how the new treaty will relate to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. The treaty entered into force in 1970 and has a total of 191 state parties, according to the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs.

In a parliamentary Q&A session in November last year, Norway’s Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Søreide also stressed that Norway is committed to the NPT and wants to focus national efforts on preventing development and proliferation of nuclear weapons.

“It is a priority for Norway to shield this important treaty, which for the past 50 years has contributed to international security,” the Foreign Minister stated.

SHOW COMMENTS