SHARE
COPY LINK

ELECTION

EU election ANALYSIS: Cut the hysteria, Le Pen is not on her way to French presidency

Marine Le Pen's party may have topped the European elections in France, but it doesn't mean the far-right leader is on her way to the Elysée palace, writes John Lichfield in his analysis of Sunday's vote.

EU election ANALYSIS: Cut the hysteria, Le Pen is not on her way to French presidency
A beaming Marine Le Pen after hearing the poll results. Photo: AFP

Can we please first deal with the hysteria which will, no doubt, surround Marine Le Pen’s exploit in topping the European Elections poll in France?

This does not mean that the far right is on course to win the French presidency in three years’ time. Marine Le Pen’s 23 to 24 per cent of the vote was slightly less than she got in the last euro elections in 2014.

Given Emmanuel Macron’s unpopularity, the high turnout and the Gilets Jaunes rebellion, she might have expected to do better. Instead, the last minute surge of voting benefitted the unfancied Greens, who came from nowhere to an extraordinary score of 12 per cent.

READ ALSO

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron at a polling station in Le Touquet. Photo: AFP

There is now clearly a constituency of mainly young, French people who dislike Macron, detest Le Pen and have no time for the old governing parties of centre-left and centre-right. This was a constituency which Macron had hoped to have made his own by now. In that, he has failed.

The result is a severe blow to Macron. It is not a stunning reverse.

He can live with a 1 to 2 per cent margin for Le Pen’s Rassemblement National. His electoral base – the 24 per cent he scored in the first round of the presidential election in 2017 – has frayed but has more or less stayed together.

The problem for Macron is that he raised the stakes in this election – three times – and then lost.

He declared the poll to be a Good v Evil confrontation between his ideas for a European Union “renaissance” and resurgent nationalism. He declared the election to be a referendum on his presidency after the Yellow Vest rebellion. He defied French political convention and entered the campaign himself.

The second place for his Renaissance list is therefore a personal failure. It will damage his hopes of emerging as the de facto leader of the European Union when Angela Merkel retires. It will complicate, but not destroy, his hopes of pushing through his pension, tax and other reforms in his remaining three years.

His “defeat” may re-ignite the stuttering Yellow Vest rebellion by renewing the unjustified allegations that he is somehow an illegitimate President.

But there are also encouraging signs for Macron in this poll. The old centre-right and centre-left parties, humiliated in 2017, remain scattered and deeply unpopular.

The projected 8 per cent score for the centre right Les Républicains is a calamity for the party of Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy. It will touch off another round of blood-letting within their ranks.

The centre-right leader Laurent Wauquiez gambled by choosing a young socially conservative list leader in François-Xavier Bellamy. The plan was to build on the party’s bourgeois Catholic base. It failed. Mr Wauquiez will pay the price.

The left also remains divided and weak. The projected 7 per cent for Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s hard left party is a humiliation.

The fact that the poll became a referendum on Macron, or his two-horse race with Le Pen, evidently squeezed both centre-right and Left. The fact remains that neither of France’s once dominant “families” of government shows any sign of recovering from their 2017 meltdown.

In these circumstances, the 2022 presidential election shapes up to be another Macron-Le Pen dual – and one that Macron seems certain to win.

The French economy is recovering strongly. Unemployment is at 8.4 per cent, the lowest for ten years. Foreign investment is booming.

Le Pen’s economic programme is muddled and self-contradictory.

More than 60 per cent of French people say she is dangerous and that her party is institutionally racist. Her projected 23 to 24 per cent in the Euro poll is respectable but suggests she has failed to extend her own base despite Macron’s travails.

The real warning to Macron in the European elections results is that extraordinary result for the Greens, or EELV, despite a low key campaign by their list leader, Yannick Jadot.

The Green surge suggests that the hunger for radical, respectable change that brought  Macron to power in 2017 remains intact. But a large section of French voters, mostly young ones, no longer believes that Emmanuel Macron is the man who can deliver the new kind of politics they crave.

Could the Greens provide the challenger to Macron – or Le Pen – in the second round of the 2022 presidential election? Hardly likely. But French politics – like politics in Britain and elsewhere – are mutating in ways that are impossible to predict.

Here is one prediction all the same. Marine Le Pen will never be President of France.

The danger will come, post-Marine, if a more plausible French populist leader emerges – a French Matteo Salvini not a French Donald Trump.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

OPINION AND ANALYSIS

OPINION: Why Germans’ famed efficiency makes the country less efficient

Germans are famous for their love of efficiency - and impatience that comes with it. But this desire for getting things done as quickly as possible can backfire, whether at the supermarket or in national politics, writes Brian Melican.

OPINION: Why Germans' famed efficiency makes the country less efficient

A story about a new wave of “check-outs for chatting” caught my eye recently. In a country whose no-nonsense, “Move it or lose it, lady!” approach to supermarket till-staffing can reduce the uninitiated to tears, the idea of introducing a slow lane with a cashier who won’t sigh aggressively or bark at you for trying to strike up conversation is somewhere between quietly subversive and positively revolutionary – and got me thinking.

Why is it that German supermarket check-outs are so hectic in the first place?

READ ALSO: German supermarkets fight loneliness with slower check outs for chatting

If you talk to people here about it – other Germans, long-term foreign residents, and keen observers on shorter visits – you’ll hear a few theories.

One is that Germans tend to shop daily on the way home from work, and so place a higher premium on brisk service than countries where a weekly shop is more common; and it is indeed a well-researched fact that German supermarket shopping patterns are higher-frequency than in many comparable countries.

Bavarian supermarket

A sign at a now-famous supermarket in Bavaria advertises a special counter saying “Here you can have a chat”. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Karl-Josef Hildenbrand

Another theory is that, in many parts of the country (such as Bavaria), supermarket opening hours are so short that there is no other way for everyone to get their shopping done than to keep things ticking along at a good old clip.

The most simple (and immediately plausible) explanation, of course, is that supermarkets like to keep both staffing and queuing to a minimum: short-staffing means lower costs, while shorter queues make for fewer abandoned trolleys.

German love of efficiency

Those in the know say that most store chains do indeed set average numbers of articles per minute which their cashiers are required to scan – and that this number is higher at certain discounters notorious for their hard-nosed attitude.

Beyond businesses’ penny-pinching, fast-lane tills are a demonstration of the broader German love of efficiency: after all, customers wouldn’t put up with being given the bum’s rush if there weren’t a cultural premium placed on smooth and speedy operations.

Then again, as many observers not yet blind to the oddness of Germany’s daily ‘Supermarket Sweep’ immediately notice, the race to get purchases over the till at the highest possible rate is wholly counter-productive: once scanned, the items pile up faster than even the best-organised couple can stow away, leaving an embarrassing, sweat-inducing lull – and then, while people in the queue roll their eyes and huff, a race to pay (usually in cash, natch’).

In a way, it’s similar to Germany’s famed autobahns, on which there is theoretically no speed limit and on which some drivers do indeed race ahead – into traffic jams often caused by excessive velocity.

Yes, it is a classic case of more haste, less speed. We think we’re doing something faster, but actually our impatience is proving counterproductive.

German impatience

This is, in my view, the crux of the issue: Germans are a hasty bunch. Indeed, research shows that we have less patience than comparable European populations – especially in retail situations. Yes, impatience is one of our defining national characteristics – and, as I pointed out during last summer’s rail meltdown, it is one of our enduring national tragedies that we are at once impatient and badly organised.

As well as at the tills and on the roads, you can observe German impatience in any queue (which we try to jump) and generally any other situation in which we are expected to wait.

Think back to early 2021, for instance, when the three-month UK-EU vaccine gap caused something approaching a national breakdown here, and the Health Minister was pressured into buying extra doses outside of the European framework.

This infuriated our neighbours and deprived developing countries of much-needed jabs – which, predictably, ended up arriving after the scheduled ones, leaving us with a glut of vaccines which, that very autumn, had to be destroyed.

A health worker prepares a syringe with the Comirnaty Covid-19 vaccine by Biontech-Pfizer. Photo: John MACDOUGALL / AFP

Now, you can see the same phenomenon with heating legislation: frustrated by the slow pace of change, Minister for Energy and the Economy Robert Habeck intended to force property owners to switch their heating systems to low-carbon alternatives within the next few years.

The fact that the supply of said alternatives is nowhere near sufficient – and that there are too few heating engineers to fit them – got lost in the haste…

The positive side of impatience

This example does, however, reveal one strongly positive side of our national impatience: if well- directed, it can create a sense of urgency about tackling thorny issues. Habeck is wrong to force the switch on an arbitrary timescale – but he is right to try and get things moving.

In most advanced economies, buildings are responsible for anything up to 40 percent of carbon emissions and, while major industrials have actually been cutting their CO2 output for decades now, the built environment has hardly seen any real improvements.

Ideally, a sensible compromise will be reached which sets out an ambitious direction of travel – and gets companies to start expanding capacity accordingly, upping output and increasing the number of systems which can be replaced later down the line. Less haste now, more speed later.

The same is true of our defence policy, which – after several directionless decades – is now being remodelled with impressive single-mindedness by a visibly impatient Boris Pistorius.

As for the check-outs for chatting, I’m not sure they’ll catch on. However counterproductive speed at the till may be, I just don’t see a large number of us being happy to sacrifice the illusion of rapidity so that a lonely old biddy can have a chinwag. Not that we are the heartless automatons that makes us sound like: Germany is actually a very chatty country.

It’s just that there’s a time and a place for it: at the weekly farmer’s markets, for instance, or at the bus stop. The latter is the ideal place to get Germans talking, by the way: just start with “About bloody time the bus got here, eh?” So langsam könnte der Bus ja kommen, wie ich finde…

READ ALSO: 7 places where you can actually make small talk with Germans

SHOW COMMENTS