SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Danish MP denies ‘Nazi reference’ after widespread criticism

Morten Østergaard, the leader of Denmark’s Social Liberal (Radikale Venstre) party, has denied a phrase he used to describe political opponents had deliberate connotations with Nazism.

Danish MP denies 'Nazi reference' after widespread criticism
Morten Østergaard. Photo: Ida Guldbæk Arentsen/Ritzau Scanpix

In an interview with newspaper Børsen, Østergaard criticised Mette Frederiksen, leader of the Social Democrats and an erstwhile political ally, for announcing her party would not seek to govern in coalition with Østergaard’s Social Liberals.

The announcement by Frederiksen increases the possibility of closer collaboration between the Social Democrats and right-wing Danish People’s Party.

Østergaard described such a potential combination as a “red-brown cabinet”.

“A red-brown cabinet like this, with a Social Democratic government with the Socialist People’s Party [smaller left-wing party, ed.] and Danish People’s Party – would they be capable of strengthening society,” he said to Børsen.

The use of the expression “red-brown” was subsequently flagged as being associated with Nazism and the brown shirts worn by the original paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party.

Historians, as well as politicians from the Social Democrats, Socialist People’s Party, Danish Party and the Liberal party, the senior partner in the government, all criticised the wording used by Østergaard.

Socialist People’s Party leader Pia Olsen Dyhr wrote in a tweet that Østergaard was “desperate”, ostensibly in reference to the decision by her party and the Social Democrats to align themselves more closely to the Danish People’s Party.

Dyhr also wrote that she was “shocked and quite angry”, adding that the reference was “ahistorical”.

Frederiksen, in an appearance on the Deadline news programme on national broadcaster DR2, said that Østergaard should “stick to political discussion”.

“My basic feeling is that that if we politicians do not show respect for each other and are civil, we cannot ask the Danish population to respect us. So I will not be debating in this way,” she said.

In statements made to newspapers Berlingske and Kristeligt Dagblad, Østergaard denied he had intentionally made the connection.

“What unites these parties is some very left-wing economic policies and right-wing immigration policy. This is not about the past, it’s about the future. That’s all there is to it,” he told the two newspapers via text message.

Speaking on DR radio station P1 on Friday, Østergaard said that the combination of parties can be called “red-yellow, if that’s how it should be”.

“My point is, listen to want I’m saying. Listen to what I said. It’s [about] left-wing economic policies and right-wing values,” he said, adding that he considered the outrage over the issue to be an “intentional misunderstanding”.

READ ALSO: Social Democrats go it alone in break with allies over immigration

For members

POLITICS

EXPLAINED: How AI deep fakes are bringing new tensions to Danish politics

Denmark's culture minister said on Monday he hoped to use copyright law to bring an end to the controversial new trend of using deep fake videos in politics. Here's the background.

EXPLAINED: How AI deep fakes are bringing new tensions to Danish politics

Jakob Engel-Schmidt, who represents the Moderate Party, warned that the technique, used in recent videos by the far-right Danish People’s Party and libertarian Liberal Alliance were the “top level of  a slippery slope that could end up undermining our trust in one another and making every political message, newspaper article and artistic publication a potential battleground for whether it is true or false”. 

Which parties have used deepfake video in campaigning? 

The Danish People’s Party at the end of last month issued an AI-generated deepfake video showing a spoof speech in which Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen appeared to announce that Ascension Day, Easter and Christmas would no longer be public holidays, and that they would all be replaced by the Muslim festival of Eid as the country’s only holiday. 

This was a satirical reference to the government’s unpopular decision to abolish Store bededag, or “Great Prayer Day” as a public holiday. 

The video was clearly labelled as AI-generated, and ends with the Danish People’s Party’s leader, Morten Messeschmidt, awakening from a nightmare. 

The Liberal Alliance also released a video for Great Prayer Day, in which it used AI to turn Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen (S), Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen (V) and Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen (M) into eccentric-looking characters similar to those in the film’s of the US director Wes Anderson.

What kind of a stir have the videos caused in Denmark? 

Denmark’s Minister for Digitization, Marie Bjerre, who represents the centre-right Liberal Party, was sharply critical of the Danish People’s Party’s move. 

“I think it is way over the line for the Danish People’s Party to make a deepfake of a political opponent. I don’t think it’s proper either, and they shouldn’t do it,” she said. “It is also a problem for our democracy and society. Because with deepfakes, you can create material that looks extremely credible, which means that you can really spread misinformation. That is why it is also very serious that the Danish People’s Party is using deepfake for this kind of thing.” 

She said that such videos should only be allowed if the organisation making or distributing them have received consent from the person depicted. 

“If you want to make deepfakes of people, you must ask for permission. That will be the proper way to do it,” she said. 

Messerschmidt defended the video as light-hearted satire that at the same time educated Danish people about the new technology. 

“What we can do is show Danes how to use the new technologies and how to use them in a good way, like here in an entertaining and satirical way,” he said. 

Although Engel-Schmidt said he was concerned about the use of deepfake videos in politics, he acknowledged that the light-hearted videos released by the two parties were in themselves unlikely to deceive anyone.  

How does Engel-Schmidt hope to regulate such deepfake videos? 

He said he aimed to see whether copyright law could be used to regulate such videos.

Presumably this would mean seeing whether, under law, people have a right to the use of the own image, personality or voice, and can therefore forbid them from being used without permission. 

What do the experts say? 

Christiane Vejlø, one of Denmark’s leading experts on the relationship between people and technology, welcomed the government’s moves towards regulating deepfake videos, pointing to the impact they were already having on politics in other countries such as India and the US.

“There is no doubt that we will have to deal with this phenomenon. It has an impact on something that is most important to us in a democracy – namely trust and faith in other people,” she told Denmark’s public broadcaster DR.

In the current Indian election campaign, she said that deepfakes of popular Bollywood actors had been used to criticise the current government and encourage voters to vote for the opposition.

“In India and the USA we see politicians saying things they could never think of saying. We are getting an erosion of the truth,” she said. 

She said that even if the videos were clearly labelled as AI-generated, it did not necessarily make them unproblematic. 

“Even if you can see that it is a deepfake, it can still influence voters to think that there is something wrong with them [the politician] or that they look stupid,” she said. “We have a situation where another person is used as a digital hand puppet.” 

 
 

SHOW COMMENTS