SHARE
COPY LINK

RACIAL PROFILING

Zurich police found not guilty in racial profiling case

Three police officers have been cleared over a 2009 incident in Zurich in which a Nigerian man ended up in hospital after allegedly being assaulted during a late-night ID check.

Zurich police found not guilty in racial profiling case
Switzerland's No Racism Alliance want an independent committee on racial profiling. Photo: Depositphotos

Wilson A. was on a tram with two black friends when the officers asked the three for their papers.

When the Nigerian, then 36, demanded to know why he was being asked to show his papers, the situation escalated. Wilson A. alleges the police attacked him with pepper spray and threw him to the ground.

Read also: Reports of racism hit record high in Switzerland

One of the officers then placed him in a choke-hold “despite the fact I told him that I had had a heart operation and was carrying a defibrillator.”

“Fucking African, go back to Africa,” an officer said during the incident, according to the civil complaint filed by Wilson A.

“I thought I would never see my daughter again,” he said later of the incident.

But the three officers, including one female policewoman denied the allegations, saying Wilson A. had attacked them. They also said he had not mentioned a heart condition.

They stated they had not demanded to see his papers on a whim or “for racist motives” but because law enforcement authorities were seeking “a well-dressed, dark-skinned man”.

Read also: Racism in Switzerland – 'People of colour are automatically perceived as foreigners'

At the end of a dramatic two-day trial which was accompanied by demonstrations in support of Wilson A., state prosecutors found in the officers’ favour.

Switzerland's No Racism Alliance responded immediately by calling on Twitter for a independent committee to combat racial profiling.

The trial had originally been scheduled to go ahead in October 2016 but Wilson A.’s legal team then called for charges against the police officers involved to be elevated to “endangering life”.

Prosecutors, who had already twice tried to have the case thrown out of the courts, alleged lawyers were trying to buy time: in concurrent legal proceedings Wilson A. faced charges of violence and threatening public officials over the same 2009 incident. However, the statute of limitations in that case expired in autumn 2016.

But Wilson A.s lawyer Bruno Steiner earlier in the week told the independent Wochenzeitung newspaper that trying to get police prosecuted was a “mission impossible”. Officers “worked on their stories together” while charges were filed against his client to “turn him from a victim into a culprit”.

The Nigerian father of two told the paper he had been singled out by police for ID checks on numerous occasions, including in 2004 when he went to the post office without his documents. When his wife came to collect him, she found traces of blood on his wrists where he had been handcuffed, Wilson A. said.

“I was young and naïve. Now we know what to do. Get a doctor’s statement and maybe get the injuries photographed.”

The news above comes in the same week Zurich Police announced it wants all of its officers to wear body cams after a successful pilot project. But the move has been greeted nervously by Swiss police association the VSPB who fear it will create added pressure for officers

RACISM

Swiss parliament wants ban on extremist symbols

Swiss lawmakers on Wednesday voted in favour of banning the display of extremist and racist symbols, starting with those of a Nazi nature.

Swiss parliament wants ban on extremist symbols

The National Council lower house of parliament voted by 133 to 38 in favour of banning the public use of racist, violence-promoting and extremist symbols, such as Nazi symbols.

Switzerland, which stayed neutral during World War II, has come under pressure to fall in line with a number of other European countries in banning Nazi symbols.

Full bans are in place in Germany, Poland and several other eastern European nations.

The Swiss parliament as a whole is now in favour, after the Council of States upper house voted for such a ban in December.

The plans would also cover gestures, words, salutes or flags.

The National Council also voted by 132 to 40 for the measures to be introduced in stages — a move the government supports.

A ban on easily identifiable Nazi symbols could be implemented quickly, while other racist and extremist symbols could be identified and banned further down the line.

“We don’t want a swastika or a Hitler salute in our country, ever!” said Green lawmaker Raphael Mahaim.

“Today, in Switzerland, it is possible, it is even permitted, to display a flag with a swastika on your balcony. It is possible to put a flag bearing the image of the SS on the windshield of your car. It is possible to give the Hitler salute in public spaces.

“This situation is intolerable.”

Debate on other symbols 

Justice minister Beat Jans said the government, called the Federal Council, had hitherto relied on prevention as the main pillar against racism, but now thinks legal measures are needed.

“Anti-Semitic incidents, particularly those involving the use of Nazi symbols, have increased sharply in recent times,” he said.

“Against this background, the Federal Council decided last week that it is positive about the gradual implementation of the motion.”

He said the government wanted to introduce a special law which would mean fines could therefore be imposed.

As for banning Nazi symbols first, Mahaim accepted that debates on other symbols “will be much more difficult”.

“For example, what about the Z symbol of Putin’s army of aggression? What about the Ku Klux Klan symbol? What about the hammer and sickle symbol?” he said.

The no votes and abstentions all came from the hard-right Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which is the largest faction in the lower chamber.

SVP lawmaker Barbara Steinemann said Switzerland had successfully been able to keep extremism down to “a base of a few meaningless weirdos”.

She said a ban on symbols would not prevent the “rampant” anti-Semitic attitudes in universities and “intellectual milieus”.

Steinemann said Nazi symbolism had risen only since the Gaza war erupted in October, and “even if you don’t like to hear it, this is the influence of immigration from non-European cultures.

“We are literally engaging in symbolic politics, and we shouldn’t be doing that,” the Zurich lawmaker said.

SHOW COMMENTS