SHARE
COPY LINK

LAW

Swiss supreme court rules on fate of Siamese cat

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court is empowered to decide on all manner of issues of gravity and import: recently it was the fate of Siamese cat.

Swiss supreme court rules on fate of Siamese cat
Photo: Depositphotos

For nearly half a decade a man and a woman from the Swiss canton of Vaud have been fighting over ownership of the same Siamese cat, with the case climbing all the way up to the country’s top court.

In a dispute with nine lives, the conflict dates back to 2013 when the woman handed the cat in question to a male acquaintance so that he could look after the animal during her five-week holiday. However, the woman simply failed to collect the cat on her return.

In October 2014 however, the woman visited the cat carer. Then in the middle of the night, she simply took the cat with her.

That’s when the legal table tennis game began, according to Swiss news portal 20 minutes. The man took the case to court and the female ‘cat-napper’ was fined 2000 francs for minor theft. She was also forced to pay legal costs and hand over 500 francs in moral damages to the man.

But the women then appealed to the cantonal court in Vaud and won: the court argued she had always been the owner of the cat and therefore she could not be sentenced to theft.

Meanwhile, the cat continued to live with the woman and still does so.

Not content with letting sleeping cats lie, the man went on to take the case to the federal courts. He argued that the cantonal court had never ruled on his claim that the cat had been given to him as a gift or was promised to him as a gift.

In what could be one final twist in the case, the cantonal court in Vaud must look at the case again and decide if this was indeed the case.

As the supreme court said in its ruling on Tuesday, ownership of pets falls to the new owner after two months if no other arrangements are made.

CRIME

Thirteen in court over death threats to French teenager after her social media tirades against Islam

Thirteen people go on trial in Paris on Thursday on charges of online harassment and in some cases death threats against a teenage girl who posted social media tirades against Islam, which saw her placed under police protection and forced to change schools.

Thirteen in court over death threats to French teenager after her social media tirades against Islam
Mila's lawyer Richard Malka has been involved in several high-profile freedom of expression trials, including the Charlie Hebdo trials. Photo: Martin Bureau/AFP

The  ‘Affaire Mila’ sparked outrage and renewed calls to uphold free-speech rights after the 16-year-old was subjected to a torrent of abuse on social media after her expletive-laden videos went viral last year.

“The Koran is filled with nothing but hate, Islam is a shitty religion,” Mila said in the first post on Instagram in January 2020.

READ ALSO What is the Affaire Mila and why is it causing outrage?

A second one in November, this time on TikTok, came after the jihadist killing of high school teacher Samuel Paty over his showing of controversial cartoons of the prophet Mohamed to students.

The reactions were swift and virulent.

“You deserve to have your throat cut,” read one, while another warned “I’m going to do you like Samuel Paty”.

Mila had to be placed under police protection along with her family in Villefontaine, a town outside Lyon in southeast France, and was forced to change schools.

Even President Emmanuel Macron came to her defence, saying that “the law is clear. We have the right to blaspheme, to criticise and to caricature religions.”

Investigators eventually identified thirteen people from several French regions aged 18 to 30, and charged them with online harassment, with some also accused of threatening death or other criminal acts.

“This is a trial against the digital terror that unleashes sexist, homophobic and intolerant mobs against a teenager,” Mila’s lawyer Richard Malka told AFP ahead of the trial, which opens on Thursday afternoon.

“This digital lynching must be punished,” he said.

But defence lawyers have argued that the 13 on trial are unfairly taking the rap as scapegoats for thousands of people taking advantage of the anonymity offered by social media platforms.

“My client is totally overwhelmed by this affair,” said Gerard Chemla, a lawyer for one of the accused. “He had a fairly stupid instant reaction, the type that happens every day on Twitter.”

The accused face up to two years in prison and fines of €30,000 for online harassment.

A conviction of death threats carries a maximum penalty of three years in prison – two people previously convicted of death threats against Mila have received prison terms.

Mila, now 18, is to publish a book this month recounting her experience, titled “I’m paying the price for your freedom.”

SHOW COMMENTS