SHARE
COPY LINK

NUCLEAR

French nuclear plants vulnerable to terror attacks, experts say

International experts warned on Tuesday about security shortcomings at French and Belgian nuclear plants that make them vulnerable to attack, in a worrying new report commissioned by the Greenpeace group.

French nuclear plants vulnerable to terror attacks, experts say
Photo: AFP

International experts warned on Tuesday about security shortcomings at French and Belgian nuclear plants that make them vulnerable to attack, in a report commissioned by the Greenpeace group.

France has the second-biggest fleet of nuclear plants in the world, after the United States, with 58 reactors providing 75 percent of the country's
electricity. Belgium has two.

The seven experts from France, Germany, Britain and the US — specialists in nuclear safety, proliferation, economics and radiation — looked at various
attack scenarios involving plants in both countries, some of which date back over three decades.

Noting the “very high level of threat to security in France and Europe” they said nuclear power plants were “without a doubt, a risk”.

For security reasons, anti-nuclear group Greenpeace did not publish the full version of the report, which it said it would share with authorities in
France, Belgium and neighbouring countries.

In a public summary, the experts noted that most of France's reactors were built before the rise of modern-day threats from non-state terror groups such as Islamic State or Al-Qaeda. 

“For these historical reasons, reinforcement against heavy attacks on civil engineering works and protection systems for nuclear safety was not — or only marginally — incorporated into the design of these facilities,” they said.

The dangers were “even more pronounced in the case of spent fuel pools”, which were not encased in confinement buildings like reactors, despite containing hundreds of tonnes of highly radioactive fuel.

'End the silence'

France has a total of 63 pools containing highly radioactive fuel rods that have been removed from reactors after their use.

The report said an attack on such a structure “could maximise the accident scenario in which fuel is uncovered, heats to the point of fusion and a
significant fraction of its radioactivity is released,” into the building and — given the building's lack of containment — into the wider environment.

The safety of France and Belgium's nuclear plants has been in the spotlight for years.

Belgian police investigating the November 2015 Paris terror attacks found 10 hours of video of the comings and goings of a senior Belgian nuclear
official.

A year previously, the Doel 4 reactor, close to the Belgian port city of Antwerp, was shut down urgently after a leak in the turbine hall, caused by
tampering.

In France, several mystery drone overflights were reported at various nuclear plants in 2014. No group ever claimed responsibility.

The head of Greenpeace France's anti-nuclear campaign, Yannick Rousselet, stressed the need to “end the silence on the risks that hang over nuclear plants.

“(France's state electricity supplier) EDF… cannot ignore the situation. It must take the security problem in hand by carrying out the work necessary to secure spent fuel pools,” he said.

EDF, in a statement, assured its nuclear plants were “safe, properly monitored and very well protected” and that it was constantly evaluating their resistance to criminal acts or terrorism.

ENERGY

Why Germany’s nuclear exit is posing tough questions about its energy future

The Bavarian village of Gundremmingen is so proud of its nuclear power station that its coat of arms is graced with a giant golden atom.

Why Germany's nuclear exit is posing tough questions about its energy future
Gundremmingen nuclear power plant. Photo: DPA

But change is coming to the village, with the plant facing imminent closure under Germany’s energy transition policy.

Former village mayor Wolfgang Mayer’s house has direct views of the imposing complex with its two 160-metre cooling towers — taller than the spires of Cologne Cathedral.

The plant still produces 10 billion kWh of power per year, though parts of it have already been shut down — enough to provide the entire Munich metropolitan region with electricity.

The power station will be decommissioned on December 31, 2021, along with two other facilities in northern Germany.

By the end of 2022, Germany will have achieved its goal of completely phasing out nuclear power, set by Chancellor Angela Merkel on May 30, 2011, in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

SEE ALSO: Berlin agrees to compensate power firms for nuclear phase out

The plan represented a dramatic change of course by Merkel’s ruling conservatives, who just a few months earlier had agreed to extend the lifespan of Germany’s oldest power stations.

But it was met with widespread public support in a country with a powerful anti-nuclear movement, fuelled first by fears of a Cold War conflict and then by disasters such as Chernobyl.

Village church

In Gundremmingen, however, the decision has been a tough pill to swallow.

The nuclear power station has been “as much a part of the village as the church” and it feels as though “something is dying”, said Gerlinde Hutter, owner of a local guest house.

According to Meyer, it will take at least 50 years to remove all radioactive material from the site after the plant has been decommissioned.
The German government is still looking for a long-term storage site for the country’s residual nuclear waste.

Gundremmingen is not the only German village facing big changes as the country strives to implement its energy transition strategy.

Renewables have seen a spectacular rise since 2011 and in 2020 made up more than 50 percent of Germany’s energy mix for the first time, according to the Fraunhofer research institute — compared with less than 25 percent ten years ago.

The declining importance of nuclear power (12.5 percent in 2020) “has been compensated for by the expansion of renewable energies”, Claudia Kemfert, an energy expert at the DIW economic research institute, told AFP.

Nuclear power stations have therefore not been replaced by coal, though the fossil fuel does still represent almost a quarter of the electricity mix.

The gas dilemma

In fact, the phase-out of nuclear energy has been joined by another plan, announced in 2019, to close all of Germany’s coal-fired power stations by 2038.

This presents a particular challenge for Germany, which remains the world’s leading producer of lignite.

Mining for the brown coal, which is highly polluting, continues to lead to the destruction of villages in the west of the country in order to expand huge open-cast mines.

If Germany is to free itself from lignite, renewables such as wind, solar, biomass and hydropower will have to make up 65 percent of the energy mix by 2030.

Yet the country, which has long been at the forefront of wind energy in Europe, installed only 1.65 gigawatts (GW) of wind farms last year — the lowest level in a decade, according to the WindEurope advocacy group.

To meet the government’s targets, Germany would have to add 9.8 GW of solar and 5.9 GW of onshore wind annually, according to Kemfert.

But the development of new areas for wind or photovoltaic energy production is complex, with plans often coming up against resistance from local residents and the risk of damage to the landscape.

And unless storage and distribution can be improved via so-called virtual power plants, these new forms of energy do not have the same stability as thermal or nuclear power.

To secure its supply, Germany could therefore be tempted to build more gas-fired power stations.

But this would risk reinforcing its dependence on Russia, as illustrated by the controversy surrounding the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.

A gas-fired power station is already in the works for the town of Leipheim, just around the corner from Gundremmingen.

SHOW COMMENTS