SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

Free movement with EU has boosted Swiss job market: report

Switzerland’s bilateral agreement with the European Union allowing the free movement of people has increased the number of highly-skilled jobs in the country and reoriented the Swiss economy towards high-value activity.

Free movement with EU has boosted Swiss job market: report
Photo: wlad74/Depositphotos
That’s the conclusion of the Swiss secretariat for economic affairs (Seco) in a report reflecting on 15 years of free movement. 
 
The alpine country signed the bilateral accord with the EU in 1999 and it came into affect three years later, on June 1st 2002.
 
The agreement allows citizens of the EU to live and work in Switzerland – and vice versa – mutually recognizing professional qualifications, granting the right to buy property and coordinating social insurance systems. 
 
Despite the turbulent economic times in recent years, Switzerland “has experienced very favourable economic development and sustained growth in jobs over the last 15 years in comparison with the international picture,” Seco said in a report on Tuesday.
 
During this period the job market has risen sharply, notably in high-level fields, leading to a sustained demand for highly-skilled labour. 
 
“EU immigrants have contributed to this structural change; today they represent a large part of the workforce in professions requiring the highest level qualifications,” it said.
 
 
Since a more prosperous and larger population requires more goods and services, job sectors including construction, transport, training and healthcare have increased, added Seco. 
 
The growth in public-sector jobs has benefited native Swiss workers, it said. In other service sectors such as construction, foreigners have been able to fill the gap as the number of available Swiss workers drops off due to a general rise in their qualification level. 
 
“The development of the employment market over the last 15 years suggests that immigration has, on the whole, positively complemented the potential of the domestic workforce,” it said.
 
Immigration hasn’t led to increased unemployment among Swiss workers. In fact, it’s foreigners who are more likely to face unemployment, concluded Seco.
 
People from southern and eastern EU nations experience higher than average rates of unemployment, mainly because immigrants from these regions are more present in sectors where job conditions are unstable. 
 
Salaries have increased by 0.8 percent on average per year, with even the lowest-paid jobs experiencing salary growth.
 
Reduced numbers
 
Despite Seco’s positive picture, immigration from the EU has gone down noticeably since 2013, it said. 
 
The migratory balance – the number of arrivals minus the number of departures – was down 27 percent to 35,000 in 2016.
 
The reduction in the number of immigrants from Spain, Portugal and Germany has been particularly marked, mainly because unemployment rates in those countries have gone down. 
 
However French and Italian workers are still coming to Switzerland and also make up the majority of ‘frontaliers/frontalieri', as cross border workers are known.
 
In contrast, immigration from Romania and Bulgaria has gone up considerably, a result of free movement being fully extended to those countries on June 1st 2016. 
 
In 2016 about 30 percent of EU immigrants came from eastern European countries, said Seco.
 
Political issue
 
Immigration has been a political hot potato in Switzerland in recent years, since the country in 2014 voted in favour of a popular initiative to curb immigration. 
 
The success of the initiative, which contravened the free movement agreement, threw relations between Switzerland and the EU into disarray. 
 
After more than two years of debate in the Swiss parliament, the government decided not to fully implement the anti-immigration initiative, preferring to preserve free movement and its relationship with the EU. 
 
But the saga is not over, as an anti-immigration group backed by the political right has already expressed its intention to launch a campaign for a referendum to quash free movement altogether.
 
 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

EUROPEAN UNION

Why does Switzerland have to comply with European court rulings?

Europe's top rights court ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, condemning it to a hefty fee. But why does Switzerland have to abide by this decision?

Why does Switzerland have to comply with European court rulings?

In a landmark ruling handed down on April 9th, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg sided with a group of Swiss pensioners who ‘sued’ the country for not doing enough to mitigate the effects of global warming. 

The ECHR ruled that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the “right to respect for private and family life,” and ordered the government to pay the complainants a fine of €80,000 (78,555 francs). 

READ ALSO: Who are Switzerland’s victorious climate ‘Elders’? 

While environmental groups and a number of political parties welcomed the verdict, questions also arose about why Switzerland, which is not a member of the EU, must comply with the decision handed down by the Council of Europe’s court.

This fact was not lost on the populist, anti-EU Swiss People’s Party (SVP).

One of its MPs, Jean-Luc Addor, questioned not only the court’s judgment, but also the fact that foreign judges have ‘meddled’ in Swiss matters.

“What is the legitimacy of the ECHR to pronounce such a ‘condemnation’?,” he asked.” Is it now going to send the European army to Switzerland?”

So why is Switzerland obligated to conform to the ECHR’s judgment? 

In 1974, the country, though neutral, signed the European Convention on Human Rights.

As the European court was established expressly to monitor the parties’ compliance with the provisions enshrined in the Convention, Switzerland must heed its judgements. (The ECHR hears only matters related to human rights. It does not handle any criminal cases).

To ensure that rulings are just and impartial, the ECHR’s judges come from the 46 countries that ratified the Convention.

Switzerland is represented by Andreas Zünd, who has served on the ECHR since January 2021.

How do Swiss cases end up in front of ECHR judges?

Switzerland has different court levels: district, cantonal, and federal.

Complainants first file their cases in the district court. If they are not happy with the verdict, they can appeal it within 30 days, at which point the case will go to the higher judicial level, that is, the cantonal court.

The next step up the judicial ladder is the Federal Supreme court, the highest judicial authority in Switzerland.

Headquartered in Lausanne, it is the final instance on all appeals against decisions of the cantonal courts.

But though this final judgment can’t be appealed in Switzerland, the case  — if it relates to rights outlined in the Convention — can be taken to the ECHR.

READ ALSO: What you should know about Switzerland’s courts 

What ‘Swiss cases’ have been judged by the European court?

The climate activists’ case is the latest of dozens of rulings involving complaints from Switzerland. 

Some of the other successful ones involved a widower whose pension benefits were denied by a Swiss court; a Romanian woman fined for beginning in Geneva; and a Sudanese man who won his appeal against deportation from Switzerland

You can see all the ECHR rulings for Switzerland (in German or French) for the last 45 years here.

SHOW COMMENTS