SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

Danish minister: ‘We will not pay more’ to EU after Brexit

Minister of Finance Kristian Jensen says he is determined that Britain’s imminent exit from the EU will not mean more expensive membership for Denmark.

Danish minister: 'We will not pay more' to EU after Brexit
Finance Minister Kristian Jensen. Photo: Martin Sylvest/Scanpix

The Scandinavian country currently benefits from a membership discount due to the contribution made by the UK for its membership.

Sweden’s prime minister Stefan Löfven said Monday that the EU would have to adjust its budget for the multi-billion euro hole left in its finances by Britain’s exit.

But Jensen said that Denmark would rather focus on the total amount it pays into the European Union.

Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany and the Netherlands currently benefit from a discount on their EU memberships that is measured proportionally to the UK’s own contribution, which in turn is given an instant discount or rebate, despite it making up a large proportion of the union’s total income.

Once the British rebate disappears, the basis for the other countries receiving discounts on their membership goes with it, reports Danish news agency Ritzau.

But Jensen told the agency the he did not see any cause for concern.

“Our [discount] already has an expiry date and runs out in 2020. So the most important thing for me is how much we must pay to the EU,” Jensen said.

Löfven and Swedish finance minister Magdalena Andersson expressed their concerns Monday about having to partially foot the bill following the loss of Britain’s membership contribution.

Sweden risked ending up with a bill of ten billion Swedish kronor (€1.05 billion) per year if the EU did not reduce its expenses following Brexit, said Andersson.

Britain current membership fee is around €21 billion before the rebate is applied, approximately 15 percent of the total membership fees paid by the 28 EU countries.

Some of this contribution is offset by spending on Britain by the EU however, making the net loss of income from the country’s departure lower.

Löfven said that he hoped that other countries that were net contributors to the EU – including the Netherlands, Germany and Austria – would support the reduction of costs to offset loss of income from member contributions.

Andersson added that she supported the reallocation of EU spending, with more less money going to areas such as agricultural and regional aid and more to what she described as “genuine common problems and challenges”, including migration, competitiveness and climate change, reports Swedish news agency TT.

But the primary concern for Denmark would be the total amount Denmark pays for its membership of the union, Jensen said.

“The important thing is what Denmark has to pay. And I don’t think we should pay one krone more than we do now,” the minister said, according to Ritzau.

Like Löfven, Jensen underlined the need for the EU to adjust its budget according to the income change after Brexit.

“The EU must make sure that it adjusts its cost according to the income sources it has. Including after Brexit,” he said.

The British membership discount dates back to the 1980s, when eurosceptic prime minister Margaret Thatcher negotiated cheaper membership for the UK with the words “I want my money back”.

In 2013, former Danish prime minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt pushed through an agreement saving the country one billion kroner (€134 million) on its fees, with the justification that Denmark’s membership was costing more than the economic support it received from the union.

Read also: UK absent as EU leaders seek unity on 60th birthday

IMMIGRATION

Border centres and ‘safe’ states: The EU’s major asylum changes explained

UPDATE: The EU parliament has adopted a sweeping reform of Europe's asylum policies that will both harden border procedures and force all the bloc's 27 nations to share responsibility.

Border centres and 'safe' states: The EU's major asylum changes explained

The parliament’s main political groups overcame opposition from far-right and far-left parties to pass the new migration and asylum pact — enshrining a difficult overhaul nearly a decade in the making.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the vote, saying it will “secure European borders… while ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights” of migrants.

“We must be the ones to decide who comes to the European Union and under what circumstances, and not the smugglers and traffickers,” she said.

EU governments — a majority of which previously approved the pact — also welcomed its adoption.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Greece’s migration minister, Dimitris Kairidis, both called it “historic”.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Europe was acting “effectively and humanely” while Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi hailed what he termed “the best possible compromise”.

But there was dissent when Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban derided the reform as “another nail in the coffin of the European Union”.

“Unity is dead, secure borders are no more. Hungary will never give in to the mass migration frenzy! We need a change in Brussels in order to Stop Migration!” Orban said in a post on social media platform X.

For very different reasons, migrant charities also slammed the pact, which includes building border centres to hold asylum-seekers and sending some to outside “safe” countries.

Amnesty International said the EU was “shamefully” backing a deal “they know will lead to greater human suffering” while the Red Cross federation urged member states “to guarantee humane conditions for asylum seekers and migrants affected”.

The vote itself was initially disrupted by protesters yelling: “The pact kills — vote no!”, while dozens of demonstrators outside the parliament building in Brussels held up placards with slogans decrying the reform.

The parliament’s far-left grouping, which maintains that the reforms are incompatible with Europe’s commitment to upholding human rights, said it was a “dark day”.

It was “a pact with the devil,” said Damien Careme, a lawmaker from the Greens group.

Border centres

As well as Orban, other far-right lawmakers also opposed the passage of the 10 laws making up the pact as insufficient to stop irregular migrants they accuse of spreading insecurity and threatening to “submerge” European identity.

Marine Le Pen, the figurehead of France’s far-right National Rally, complained the changes would give “legal impunity to NGOs complicit with smugglers”.

She and her party’s leader who sits in the European Parliament, Jordan Bardella, said they would seek to overturn the reform after EU elections in June, which are tipped to boost far-right numbers in the legislature.

The pact’s measures are due to come into force in 2026, after the European Commission first sets out how it would be implemented.

New border centres would hold irregular migrants while their asylum requests are vetted. And deportations of those deemed inadmissible would be sped up.

The pact also requires EU countries to take in thousands of asylum-seekers from “frontline” states such as Italy and Greece, or — if they refuse — to provide money or other resources to the under-pressure nations.

Even ahead of Orban’s broadside, his anti-immigration government reaffirmed Hungary would not be taking in any asylum-seekers.

“This new migration pact practically gives the green light to illegal migration to Europe,” Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said before the vote, adding that Budapest “will not allow illegal migrants to set foot here in Hungary”.

‘EU solidarity’

German’s Scholz said on X that the accord stands for “solidarity among European states” and would “finally relieve the burden on those countries that are particularly hard hit”.

One measure particularly criticised by migrant charities is the sending of asylum-seekers to countries outside the EU deemed “safe”, if the migrant has sufficient ties to that country.

The pact resulted from years of arduous negotiations spurred by a massive inflow of irregular migrants in 2015, many from war-torn Syria and Afghanistan.

Under current EU rules, the arrival country bears responsibility for hosting and vetting asylum-seekers and returning those deemed inadmissible. That has put southern frontline states under pressure and fuelled far-right opposition.

A political breakthrough came in December when a weighted majority of EU countries backed the reforms — overcoming opposition from Hungary and Poland.

In parallel with the reform, the EU has been multiplying the same sort of deal it struck with Turkey in 2016 to stem migratory flows.

It has reached accords with Tunisia and, most recently, Egypt that are portrayed as broader cooperation arrangements. Many lawmakers have, however, criticised the deals.

SHOW COMMENTS