SHARE
COPY LINK

ELECTION

Is a new political alliance forming in Denmark?

The Danish People’s Party (DF) and the Social Democrats (S) have long resided within their respective ‘blocs’ in the national political makeup, with DF a member of the right-of-centre blue bloc and the Social Democrats the leading party of the left-of-centre red bloc.

Is a new political alliance forming in Denmark?
DF's Kristian Thulesen Dahl and the Social Democrats' Mette Frederiksen got the Danish political world talking with their joint interview. Photo: Liselotte Sabroe/Scanpix
The two parties have a lot of overlapping positions and were traditionally divided primarily by DF’s hard-line anti-immigration stance. But recent years have seen the Social Democrats swing hard to the right on immigration in an attempt to keep blue-collar voters from fleeing to DF. 
 
The two parties have often found common ground and political commentators and analysts have long floated the idea that DF and S could form an alliance that reaches across the centre of Danish politics and freezes out Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s Venstre party. 
 
Those whispers got much louder on Tuesday after DF party leader Kristian Thulesen Dahl and S leader Mette Frederiksen gave a joint interview to the trade union magazine Fagbladet 3F.
 
The two politicians praised each other and said that they have developed a good working relationship. 
 
“I notice that Kristian and I work in a very similar way. When there is a problem that needs solved, we make sure to find a proper solution. And we have actually succeeded in reaching a consensus in a number of areas,” Frederiksen told Fagbladet 3F. 
 
“I am pleased with the cooperation and what we’ll see what the future might bring,” she said. 
 
Dahl said that DF’s relationship with S has improved greatly since Frederiksen took over as party leader after former Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt left Danish politics shortly after her ouster in the 2015 election. 
 
“The last prime minister we had was Helle Thorning-Schidt, and I’ve said, both as a bit of a joke but also quite seriously, that I spoke more with Mette Frederiksen in the months after the 2015 election than I spoke with Helle Thorning-Schmidt during her whole term,” he said. 
 
Dahl declined to answer directly when asked if DF might back Frederiksen over Rasmussen in the next election but noted that when Rasmussen formed his single-party minority government in 2015 it gave DF “a different role in Danish politics” than it had before and that the party has used its new position to reach out to S on a number of issues. 
 
“Does it mean that things are frozen or laid in concrete forever in relation to where the [political party] positions are? No, of course not. We will use all of our energy to create the possibility for the Danish People’s Party to have a majority with more parties in parliament,” he said. 
 
Frederiksen also declined to give a definitive answer on whether S would consider asking DF to form a coalition government but hinted that she would consider all sorts of different party constellations.
 
“I think the closer we get to an election, the more alphabet games there will be,” she said, in reference to the tradition of referring to Danish governments by their party initials. The current coalition of Venstre, Liberal Alliance and the Conservatives is called the VLAK government
 
Video of the interview can be seen here, story continues below
 
 
DF was roundly criticized for declining to enter into a coalition government with Venstre in 2015 despite it getting 21.1 percent of the vote and becoming the biggest blue bloc party in parliament. Critics have accused DF of shying away from governing responsibility out of fear of losing voter support when forced to actually compromise to get things done.
 
The party, however, has argued that it has more success as an outside support party and can tout its impressive track record of getting ‘blue’ governments to bend to its will by bartering support on other legislation in order to affect policy on the party’s primary issues like tighter immigration rules and better healthcare for the elderly.
 
S currently has 46 seats in parliament, while DF has 37. The two parties would thus have to slightly improve on their 2015 election results to give them a 90 mandate majority. 
 
In Denmark, it is solely up to the prime minister to set a parliamentary election date, as long as it is done within four years of taking office. That means Rasmussen would have to call an election before June 2019. 
 
Before forming his new VLAK coalition there were rampant rumours that an election could come as early as this year, but Rasmussen seems to have staved off the threat from the libertarian-leaning Liberal Alliance by bringing them into the fold

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden’s harsh new immigration policies

The leader of Sweden's Social Democrat opposition has backed the harsh new policies on crime and immigration included in the new government's programme, and even signalled openness to the much-criticised begging ban.

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden's harsh new immigration policies

In an interview with the Expressen newspaper, Magdalena Andersson said her party was absolutely agreed on the need for a stricter immigration policy for Sweden, going so far as to take credit for the Social Democrats for the illiberal shift. 

“There is absolutely no question that need a strict set of migration laws,” she told the Expressen newspaper, rejecting the claims of Sweden Democrat Jimmie Åkesson that the government’s new program represented a “paradigm shift in migration policy”. 

“The paradigm shift happened in 2015, and it was us who carried it out,” she said. “The big rearrangement of migration policy was carried out by us Social Democrats after the refugee crisis of 2015, with a thoroughgoing tightening up of the policy.” 

READ ALSO:

She said that her party would wait and see what “concrete proposals” the new government ended up making, but she said the Social Democrats were not in principle against even the new government’s most criticised proposal: to slash the number of UN quota refugees from around 5,000 to 900. 

“That’s something we are going to look at,” she said. “It’s been at different levels at different points of time in Sweden.” 

Rather than criticise the new government for being too extreme on migration, Andersson even attacked it for not being willing to go far enough. 

The Social Democrats’ plan to tighten up labour market migration by bringing back the system of labour market testing, she said, was stricter than the plan to increase the salary threshold proposed by Ulf Kristersson’s new government.  

When it comes to the new government’s plans to bring in much tougher punishments for a string of crimes, Andersson criticised the new government for not moving fast enough. 

“What I think is important here is that there are a completed proposals for new laws already on the table which need to be put into effect,” she said. 

She also said she was not opposed to plans for a national ban on begging. 

“We Social Democrats believe that people should have the possibility to get educated, and work so they can support themselves,” she said. “That’s something we’ve believed in all along. You shouldn’t need to stand there holding your cap in your hand.” 

“It’s already possible to bring in a ban in certain municipalities today,” she continued. “So the question is really whether this should be regulated at a national or a local level. We did not decide at out national congress that it should be regulated at a national level, but when the inquiry publishes its conclusions, we will assess the advantages and disadvantages and decide on whether we will keep our position or change.” 

Where she was critical of the new government was in its failure to discuss how it would increase the budgets for municipalities and regional governments, who she said face being forced to drive through savage cuts in real spending to schools, healthcare and elderly care if they were not prioritised in the coming budget. 

“But that’s such a tiny part of this slottsavtal (“Mansion agreement”), and the government’s policy programme suggests they’ve missed something that should really be in focus for the government,” she said, warning that citizens should be braced for dramatic fall in the quality of welfare in the coming years. 

She said her party would also campaign against the new government’s plans to scrap Sweden’s goal of spending one percent of GDP on aid, and also against the new government’s plans to make it harder to build wind energy projects. 

SHOW COMMENTS