SHARE
COPY LINK

E

How economic troubles will shape Italy’s referendum

The way Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi tells it, there is no economic case for him to quit, as he has vowed to do if he loses Sunday's referendum on constitutional reform.

How economic troubles will shape Italy's referendum
Prime Minister Matteo Renzi during a joint press conference with the Italian Minister of Economy. Photo: Andreas Solaro

The centre-left former mayor of Florence celebrated 1,000 days in office earlier this month by boasting that his time in charge had delivered respectable growth (1.6 percent), a recovery in household spending (up three percent), lower unemployment (down by one percent, employment up) and healthier public finances (budget deficit lowered by 0.4 percentage points).

Renzi's figures add up, economists say. But Antonio Medugno measures the country's economic performance by different data.

“I'm 36. I work full time and employ two other people. But still I have no choice but to live with my parents,” the Naples-based electrician tells AFP.

“My father is 63. He works as a janitor in a school and earns 950 euros ($1,000) a month – after a lifetime of work. How can people get by on such miserable salaries?”

And therein may lie the explanation as to why many fed-up Italians will vote No on Sunday in a referendum that is ostensibly on proposals to reform the country's parliamentary system, but could also usher the hitherto popular young premier towards the exit.

After seizing power in an internal party coup, Renzi has overseen a slow but steady recovery following years of stagnation and recession.

Industry leaders have welcomed what they see as his significant shake-up of the labour market and support Renzi's broader reform agenda, particularly his plans to overhaul a snail-paced judicial system seen as a major obstacle to investment.

Squeezed middle

The 41-year-old's problem is that the modest improvement seen to date and the promise of more to come has not been enough to make a real difference to Italy's “squeezed middle”.

Millions of ordinary families have endured years of declining real incomes and, as in other parts of the Western world, a realization is dawning on many young people that life will be tougher, in some ways, than it was for their parents.

Two thirds of Italians aged 18-34 are still living at home, owning or even renting their own place a distant dream as the low interest environment underpins property prices, to the benefit of the older generation.

The fundamental problem is not that growth is anaemic now, but that it has been for a decade and more, says Pietro Reichlin, an economics professor at Rome's Luiss university.

Underlying that, he argues, is a problem of competitiveness in a manufacturing and export-driven economy.

Where they have an edge – in food and drink, fashion and design, the luxury sector in general – Italian companies are growing strongly. But many others, notably in the important capital goods sector, are struggling. And since Italy joined the euro, at its launch 16 years ago, securing a competitive boost through devaluation is no longer an option.

“These are problems that were never going to be resolved in one parliament,” Reichlin said.

Raj Badiani, of business intelligence group IHS Markit, concurs. “Since the entry into the euro, Italy has not been fast enough to shift from its competitive devaluation model to a model based on productivity gains and higher value added production and services,” he said.

Bank failures feared

“Renzi understood this challenge and his reform dash was trying to accelerate the painfully slow transition process.”

Recovery has also been constrained by the reluctance of banks to lend, against a backdrop of a bad loans crisis that has also loomed large in the referendum debate.

Alberto Baban, of employers' organization Confindustria, says many small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) with good fundamentals are being hampered by “an ever worsening credit crunch.”

Economist Badiani said Renzi erred in not using state funds to recapitalize the stricken banks while he still could: before European rules on such schemes changed at the start of this year.

“Growth resumed in early 2015 but the investment cycle has failed to take off,” Badiani said.

Paradoxically, the crisis in the banking sector could prove to be Renzi's salvation on Sunday.

The last published opinion polls gave the No camp a significant lead, but pointed to between a quarter and a third of voters being undecided.

Some analysts think mounting speculation about post-vote market turbulence pushing the weakest banks into failure and igniting a much wider crisis may bring many of these fence-sitters into the Yes camp.

And even if Renzi is forced to step down, one of his friends in the business world, luxury fashion tycoon Brunello Cucinelli, does not expect him to give up on his mission to modernize Italy.

“I don't think anything serious will happen if the No wins,” Cucinelli told AFP. “I don't think he will abandon politics completely. He is someone we can count on to bring Italy into the modern era.”

By Olivier Baube and Angus MacKinnon

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

REFERENDUM

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum

Switzerland's decision to purchase US-made fighter jets could be put to a referendum,

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum
Swiss fighter jets. Photo: JOE KLAMAR / AFP

Switzerland’s government on Wednesday backed the purchase of 36 F-35A fighter jets from Lockheed Martin to replace its fleet and five Patriot air defence units from fellow US manufacturer Raytheon.

Switzerland’s current air defence equipment will reach the end of its service life in 2030 and has been undergoing a long and hotly-contested search for replacements.

“The Federal Council is confident that these two systems are the most suitable for protecting the Swiss population from air threats in the future,” the government said in a statement.

‘No Trump fighter jets’: Swiss don’t want to buy American planes

The decision will now be put to the Swiss parliament — and also risks being challenged at the ballot box, with left-wingers and an anti-militarist group looking to garner enough signatures to trigger a public vote.

The F-35A was chosen ahead of the Airbus Eurofighter; the F/A-18 Super Hornet by Boeing; and French firm Dassault’s Rafale.

For the ground-based air defence (GBAD) system, Patriot was selected ahead of SAMP/T by France’s Eurosam.

“An evaluation has revealed that these two systems offer the highest overall benefit at the lowest overall cost,” the government statement said. Switzerland is famously neutral. However, its long-standing position is one of armed neutrality and the landlocked European country has mandatory conscription for men.

“A fleet of 36 aircraft would be large enough to cover Switzerland’s airspace protection needs over the longer term in a prolonged situation of heightened tensions,” the government said.

“The air force must be able to ensure that Swiss airspace cannot be used by foreign parties in a military conflict.” 

Long path to decision 

Switzerland began to seek replacements for its ageing fleet of fighter jets more than a decade ago, but the issue has become caught up in a political battle in the wealthy Alpine nation.

The Swiss government has long argued for the need to quickly replace its 30 or so F/A-18 Hornets, which will reach the end of their lifespan in 2030, and the F-5 Tigers, which have been in service for four decades and are not equipped for night flights.

In 2014, the country looked set to purchase 22 Gripen E fighter jets from Swedish group Saab, only to see the public vote against releasing the funds needed to go forward with the multi-billion-dollar deal.

Bern launched a new selection process four years later, and a referendum last year to release six billion Swiss francs ($6.5 billion) for the purchase of the fighters of the government’s choice squeezed through with 50.1 percent of voters in favour.

During the referendum campaign, the government warned that without a swift replacement for its fleet, “Switzerland will no longer be in a position to protect and even less defend its airspace by 2030”.

Currently, the fleet does not have the capacity to support ground troops for reconnaissance missions or to intervene against ground targets.

Meanwhile Switzerland’s current GBAD system is also old and lacks the capacity to meet the widening spectrum of modern threats.

The military currently relies on a range of Rapier and Stinger short-range missiles that have been in service since 1963.

SHOW COMMENTS