SHARE
COPY LINK
OPINION

EUROPEAN UNION

We love Europe, so give us the passports to prove it

The 16 million Brits who voted to stay in the EU could soon be deprived of their European citizenship. EU countries should let them keep it, says Swedish learner Stuart Bonar.

We love Europe, so give us the passports to prove it
Brits are set to lose their EU citizenship, but Stuart Bonar is asking Europe to help those who want to keep it. Photo: Christopher Elison
At 11.59pm each New Year’s Eve, Britain turns to Big Ben. As it strikes 12, the bells ring out, fireworks light the sky and we welcome the New Year. But on some future date, currently unknown, those bells will herald not the fresh start of a new year, but the dawn of a grim, friendless Brexit future.
 
At a stroke, the opportunities the EU gives UK nationals to live and work across Europe vanish. I’m a Swedish learner and Brexit throws into massive doubt the ambition I have to live and work in Sweden.
 
Tough, that’s what you voted for, some may say. But many didn’t. The country is deeply, bitterly divided. 17 million voted Leave, but 16 million voted Remain. 32 million didn’t have a vote, or didn’t use it. But those 17 million voters are taking all 65 million out of the EU nonetheless.
 
And for many of us, this is a tragedy. To us, being European is as important as being British, perhaps even more so. We identify with the EU. We believe that we’re stronger standing together, not broken up and bickering.
 
Stuart Bonar. Photo: Private
 
Some Brits have escape routes. There are reports of big jumps in applications to become Swedes, Danes and Italians. Friends are rediscovering their Irish ancestry, others have already collected new passports from Germany and Cyprus.
 
But many pro-European Brits – me included – don’t have a foreign grandparent who entitles us to citizenship of another EU country. We face being left stranded here in Brexit Britain, with emboldened xenophobes and racists.
 
But what I do have is an idea. At the moment, people are EU citizens if they are nationals of an EU country. My idea is that the EU simply uncouples that. It could allow individuals of countries leaving the EU to become European citizens directly, by choice.
 
You’d have to opt in, be able to prove you’re pro-European, maybe have to pass a citizenship test. It would allow the UK to leave the EU and anti-Europeans to go with it, while letting pro-Europeans stay and keep their freedom of movement.
 
I put this idea forward in a blog post earlier this month. A few tweets and Facebook posts later and it’s reached over 100,000 people, with 8,700 supporters signing up.
But what’s in it for the rest of Europe? With a big member leaving there’s a risk the EU looks to be in decline, that its 12 stars are setting not rising. What better way to give Europe renewed zip and energy than footage of smiling Brits waving burgundy passports for the TV cameras, like the first Apple customers to get their hands on a new iPhone?
 
And with British politics turning to the hard right, it will be the young and educated who want out. They were Remain’s strongest backers, and they’re exactly the people the EU wants and needs. They’ll be straight across the Channel, with ambition, energy and creativity bursting out of their Sandqvist backpacks.
 
So, what do you think? Are you a Brit who needs a lifeline, or a fellow European willing to throw one to us? Then sign up.
 
Stuart Bonar is a public affairs advisor who lives in London and Devon, England. On Twitter, he's @StuartBonar, and with his partner he runs the Campaign to Remain page on Facebook.

IMMIGRATION

Border centres and ‘safe’ states: The EU’s major asylum changes explained

UPDATE: The EU parliament has adopted a sweeping reform of Europe's asylum policies that will both harden border procedures and force all the bloc's 27 nations to share responsibility.

Border centres and 'safe' states: The EU's major asylum changes explained

The parliament’s main political groups overcame opposition from far-right and far-left parties to pass the new migration and asylum pact — enshrining a difficult overhaul nearly a decade in the making.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the vote, saying it will “secure European borders… while ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights” of migrants.

“We must be the ones to decide who comes to the European Union and under what circumstances, and not the smugglers and traffickers,” she said.

EU governments — a majority of which previously approved the pact — also welcomed its adoption.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Greece’s migration minister, Dimitris Kairidis, both called it “historic”.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Europe was acting “effectively and humanely” while Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi hailed what he termed “the best possible compromise”.

But there was dissent when Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban derided the reform as “another nail in the coffin of the European Union”.

“Unity is dead, secure borders are no more. Hungary will never give in to the mass migration frenzy! We need a change in Brussels in order to Stop Migration!” Orban said in a post on social media platform X.

For very different reasons, migrant charities also slammed the pact, which includes building border centres to hold asylum-seekers and sending some to outside “safe” countries.

Amnesty International said the EU was “shamefully” backing a deal “they know will lead to greater human suffering” while the Red Cross federation urged member states “to guarantee humane conditions for asylum seekers and migrants affected”.

The vote itself was initially disrupted by protesters yelling: “The pact kills — vote no!”, while dozens of demonstrators outside the parliament building in Brussels held up placards with slogans decrying the reform.

The parliament’s far-left grouping, which maintains that the reforms are incompatible with Europe’s commitment to upholding human rights, said it was a “dark day”.

It was “a pact with the devil,” said Damien Careme, a lawmaker from the Greens group.

Border centres

As well as Orban, other far-right lawmakers also opposed the passage of the 10 laws making up the pact as insufficient to stop irregular migrants they accuse of spreading insecurity and threatening to “submerge” European identity.

Marine Le Pen, the figurehead of France’s far-right National Rally, complained the changes would give “legal impunity to NGOs complicit with smugglers”.

She and her party’s leader who sits in the European Parliament, Jordan Bardella, said they would seek to overturn the reform after EU elections in June, which are tipped to boost far-right numbers in the legislature.

The pact’s measures are due to come into force in 2026, after the European Commission first sets out how it would be implemented.

New border centres would hold irregular migrants while their asylum requests are vetted. And deportations of those deemed inadmissible would be sped up.

The pact also requires EU countries to take in thousands of asylum-seekers from “frontline” states such as Italy and Greece, or — if they refuse — to provide money or other resources to the under-pressure nations.

Even ahead of Orban’s broadside, his anti-immigration government reaffirmed Hungary would not be taking in any asylum-seekers.

“This new migration pact practically gives the green light to illegal migration to Europe,” Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said before the vote, adding that Budapest “will not allow illegal migrants to set foot here in Hungary”.

‘EU solidarity’

German’s Scholz said on X that the accord stands for “solidarity among European states” and would “finally relieve the burden on those countries that are particularly hard hit”.

One measure particularly criticised by migrant charities is the sending of asylum-seekers to countries outside the EU deemed “safe”, if the migrant has sufficient ties to that country.

The pact resulted from years of arduous negotiations spurred by a massive inflow of irregular migrants in 2015, many from war-torn Syria and Afghanistan.

Under current EU rules, the arrival country bears responsibility for hosting and vetting asylum-seekers and returning those deemed inadmissible. That has put southern frontline states under pressure and fuelled far-right opposition.

A political breakthrough came in December when a weighted majority of EU countries backed the reforms — overcoming opposition from Hungary and Poland.

In parallel with the reform, the EU has been multiplying the same sort of deal it struck with Turkey in 2016 to stem migratory flows.

It has reached accords with Tunisia and, most recently, Egypt that are portrayed as broader cooperation arrangements. Many lawmakers have, however, criticised the deals.

SHOW COMMENTS