SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

‘Groundhog Day’ for migrants in Rome cul-de-sac

Every night the same scene unfolds in Via Cupa near Rome's Tiburtina station: one by one, migrants take a dirty and battered mattress from a pile and place it against the wall, turning the small dark street into a star-lit dormitory.

'Groundhog Day' for migrants in Rome cul-de-sac
Homeless migrants on Via Cupa, Rome. Photo: Filippo Monteforte/AFP

There are up to 300 of them at a time, mostly from Eritrea, Ethiopia and Sudan. Most have left reception centres to stay here a night or two before continuing their journeys north, some unaware the borders are closed to them, others determined to try again after failed attempts to cross.

“When the landings (of migrant boats to Italy) resumed in the spring, we gradually saw a tent pop up here, then two, then three,” said Andrea Costa, a volunteer with the Baobab Experience NGO, which until last year ran a shelter on Via Cupa.

The site was repossessed in November. As discussions with the city council over an alternative spot dragged on, the migrants simply settled out in the open and the cul-de-sac now boasts sleeping bags, pots and pans and even a table-football table.

“Watch your backs!” cry volunteers as they bring a heavy saucepan of boiling rice to a serving station, where men, women and children line up in single file to fill their plastic plates, the air heavy with the smell of fried onions.

The chefs are two young Swiss who brought their mobile kitchen to the street after doing stints in the migrant camps of Calais and Grande-Synthe in France, as well as Italy's Lake Como near the Swiss border, where some 500 migrants sleep in a park.

In some areas tempers are wearing thin as the wait to journey on to northern Europe increases: in Ventimiglia on the Italy-France border, 600 people are sheltering in a Red Cross centre. Others are put on buses and escorted back to centres down south.

In Milan some 3,300 people are camped out in the station or nearby streets in the hope of getting on a train north.

More than 100,000 migrants have been plucked off unseaworthy vessels in the Mediterranean and brought to Italy this year, and while the numbers are similar to last year, the context is radically different.

“The borders in the north are closed, migrants can't get through,” Costa told AFP.

'Almost a game'

“We're worried small Idomenis will develop in Ventimiglia, Como, Milan and Rome,” he said, referring to the vast informal refugee camp on the Greek-Macedonian border that was cleared by riot police in June.

While the 35,000 or so migrants who passed through the Baobab Centre last year managed for the large part to leave Italy, Costa sees an increasing number of people this year forced to return to Via Cupa after being turned back at the border.

For returners, life in the cul-de-sac has become a sort of “Groundhog Day”, where, as in the film, they re-live the same experience – resting, refuelling and planning yet another attempt at the crossing — over and over.

Maroma, a 19-year old from Sudan, has already made it over the Ventimiglia crossing but was stopped by police and returned to a centre in Taranto, at Italy's southern tip. Once there, he simply began the journey north again.

Fellow Sudanese Mahmad Karim pulls a notebook out from under his mattress. He wants to learn English and proudly shows off his attempts at learning and writing the Roman alphabet, from 'A' to 'Z'.

“My difficulty is the language, not the borders,” he says with a laugh.

Everyone here has spent weeks, months or even years on the road, trekking across the desert, through Libya and across the Med.

“They have no money and nothing to lose. Trying to cross the border becomes almost a game,” Costa said.

Under pressure from the European Union, Italy has stepped up efforts since 2015 to identify each and every migrant it rescues, preventing them under EU rules from applying for asylum in another European country.

In exchange, some were supposed to be relocated to other EU countries, but the programme has struggled to get off the ground.

The result is a sharp jump in the number of asylum seekers blocked in Italy – more than 144,000 currently reside in reception centres, compared to 66,000 in 2014 and 103,000 in 2015.

They may be stuck, but the determination to journey onwards is still very much alive.

“We need information more than food,” Costa says. And after dinner, out come the maps of Europe and a quick geography lesson for those planning to set off the next day, including the unwelcome news that Italy shares no borders with Britain.

BREXIT

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

The EU has drawn up plans to make it easier for non-EU citizens to gain longterm EU residency so they can move more easily around the bloc, but Italy-based citizens' rights campaigner Clarissa Killwick says Brits who moved to the EU before Brexit are already losing out.

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

With all the talk about the EU long-term residency permit and the proposed improvements there is no mention that UK citizens who are Withdrawal Agreement “beneficiaries” are currently being left out in the cold.

The European Commission has stated that we can hold multiple statuses including the EU long-term permit (Under a little-known EU law, third-country nationals can in theory acquire EU-wide long-term resident status if they have lived ‘legally’ in an EU country for at least five years) but in reality it is just not happening.

This effectively leaves Brits locked into their host countries while other third country nationals can enjoy some mobility rights. As yet, in Italy, it is literally a question of the computer saying no if someone tries to apply.

The lack of access to the EU long-term permit to pre-Brexit Brits is an EU-wide issue and has been flagged up to the European Commission but progress is very slow.

READ ALSO: EU government settle on rules for how non-EU citizens could move around Europe

My guess is that few UK nationals who already have permanent residency status under the Withdrawal Agreement are even aware of the extra mobility rights they could have with the EU long-term residency permit – or do not even realise they are two different things.

Perhaps there won’t be very large numbers clamouring for it but it is nothing short of discrimination not to make it accessible to British people who’ve built their lives in the EU.

They may have lost their status as EU citizens but nothing has changed concerning the contributions they make, both economically and socially.

An example of how Withdrawal Agreement Brits in Italy are losing out

My son, who has lived almost his whole life here, wanted to study in the Netherlands to improve his employment prospects.

Dutch universities grant home fees rather than international fees to holders of an EU long-term permit. The difference in fees for a Master’s, for example, is an eye-watering €18,000. He went through the application process, collecting the requisite documents, making the payments and waited many months for an appointment at the “questura”, (local immigration office).

On the day, it took some persuading before they agreed he should be able to apply but then the whole thing was stymied because the national computer system would not accept a UK national. I am in no doubt, incidentally, that had he been successful he would have had to hand in his WA  “carta di soggiorno”.

This was back in February 2022 and nothing has budged since then. In the meantime, it is a question of pay up or give up for any students in the same boat as my son. There is, in fact, a very high take up of the EU long-term permit in Italy so my son’s non-EU contemporaries do not face this barrier.

Long-term permit: The EU’s plan to make freedom of movement easier for non- EU nationals 

Completing his studies was stalled by a year until finally his Italian citizenship came through after waiting over 5 years.  I also meet working adults in Italy with the EU long-term permit who use it for work purposes, such as in Belgium and Germany, and for family reunification.  

Withdrawal agreement card should double up as EU long-term residency permit

A statement that Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries should be able to hold multiple statuses is not that easy to find. You have to scroll quite far down the page on the European Commission’s website to find a link to an explanatory document. It has been languishing there since March 2022 but so far not proved very useful.

It has been pointed out to the Commission that the document needs to be multilingual not just in English and “branded” as an official communication from the Commission so it can be used as a stand-alone. But having an official document you can wave at the immigration authorities is going to get you nowhere if Member State governments haven’t acknowledged that WA beneficiaries can hold multiple statuses and issue clear guidance and make sure systems are modified accordingly.

I can appreciate this is no mean feat in countries where they do not usually allow multiple statuses or, even if they do, issue more than one residency card. Of course, other statuses we should be able to hold are not confined to EU long-term residency, they should include the EU Blue Card, dual nationality, family member of an EU citizen…

Personally, I do think people should be up in arms about this. The UK and EU negotiated an agreement which not only removed our freedom of movement as EU citizens, it also failed to automatically give us equal mobility rights to other third country nationals. We are now neither one thing nor the other.

It would seem the only favour the Withdrawal Agreement did us was we didn’t have to go out and come back in again! Brits who follow us, fortunate enough to get a visa, may well pip us at the post being able to apply for EU long-term residency as clearly defined non-EU citizens.

I have been bringing this issue to the attention of the embassy in Rome, FCDO and the European Commission for three years now. I hope we will see some movement soon.

Finally, there should be no dragging of heels assuming we will all take citizenship of our host countries. Actually, we shouldn’t have to, my son was fortunate, even though it took a long time. Others may not meet the requirements or wish to give up their UK citizenship in countries which do not permit dual nationality.  

Bureaucratic challenges may seem almost insurmountable but why not simply allow our Withdrawal Agreement permanent card to double up as the EU long-term residency permit.

Clarissa Killwick,

Since 2016, Clarissa has been a citizens’ rights campaigner and advocate with the pan-European group, Brexpats – Hear Our Voice.
She is co-founder and co-admin of the FB group in Italy, Beyond Brexit – UK citizens in Italy.

SHOW COMMENTS