SHARE
COPY LINK

BREXIT

Why are the French shrugging their shoulders at Brexit?

One thing has surprised author Stephen Clarke about the French attitude towards a potential Brexit - their sheer indifference.

Why are the French shrugging their shoulders at Brexit?
Photo: Jan Lewandowski/Flickr
Not all French people know what a “Brexit” is, at least by name. The word is being used a lot by journalists, but it's not exactly getting bandied about at my corner café here in Paris.
 
What most French people do seem to have, though, is an opinion on the idea of Britain leaving the EU. From what I gather, it seems to be a fairly even split between “Ne nous quittez pas” (to misquote Jacques Brel) and “bonne continuation” (to quote French people when they don't really care what happens to you next).
 
I'm sure that every British expat is getting lectured about the sheer impoliteness of turning our backs on our continental friends. Many French people are still convinced that we Brits are only happy when staring out at a distant Europe from the safety of the White Cliffs of Dover.
 
One old monsieur I met even suggested that someone near Dover was permanently sitting by a sort of tap, waiting for the order to flood the tunnel. Though I think he was still bitter because Napoleon's plans to cross the Channel never came off. 
 
This notion of impoliteness includes, of course, the realization that without Britain, there will be a lot less money available to do things like refloat ailing European economies and subsidize French farmers. (And let's face it, anyone with a full set of taste buds is in favour of generosity towards the people who make things like Roquefort and Muscat de Rivesaltes – to name two of my own French favourites.)
 
France knows how much sterling gets pumped across the Channel, and doesn't want the flow to stop. 
 
There are, of course, all the incoming refugees to deal with, but that problem is much too complex for a mere book writer like me to get into. 
 
One thing about France's attitude towards a potential Brexit has surprised me: the amount of indifference. A few people I've talked to have made that most expressive of French noises, the pouting raspberry, accompanied perhaps by a thrust of the chin or even a shrug that informs you that the question you just asked is about as high on their list of priorities as the need to give Saturn's rings a new paint job. 
 
These aren't just French introverts whose lives wouldn't be affected by a reduction in the size of the EU's budgets or borders. They're also outward-looking people who see equal advantages in either outcome of the referendum. Deep down, the French feel confident that life will always go on being French. 
 
Some Parisian bankers I talked to were optimistic that Paris might oust London as a financial capital, so that all those French entrepreneurs who fled to London when François Hollande was elected would come flooding back. But they had also done a calculation of possible fluctuations in capital and trade, and had worked out that there was plenty of money to be made whether the referendum ends in “au revoir” or “Brexit? What Brexit?”. 
 
This was the idea that inspired my new novel, Merde in Europe. 

The hero, Paul West, is in Brussels working for a French MEP. She says she's campaigning to keep Britain in the EU. But Paul becomes increasingly suspicious of her true motives. She is French, so she has French interests at heart – running a close second behind her own self-interest. Politicians will be politicians. So what we see in the novel is Paul rampaging through the corridors of the EU institutions wondering “can all this be real?” and asking himself whether he wants to be part of it himself, both as an individual and a UK citizen. 
 
When you see the insane things that actually go on in Brussels, which I did by work-shadowing and interviewing eurocrats (who made me promise to change their names, nationalities and sometimes genders too), it helps you to decide where you think the future lies – in or out of the EU, or somewhere in between. I'm not going to say how I feel, but it takes Paul a whole novel to do so – and all is revealed at the end, of course. 
 
Stephen Clarke's new novel is Merde in Europe. It is available from all open-minded booksellers. It's also been translated into French, as God Save le Brexit? (note the question mark – the French just can't decide).

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

‘I feel exiled’: How Brits in Europe are locked abroad with foreign partners

Britons and their European families are being divided or simply unable to move back to the UK because of strict income requirements, which are now set to rise steeply. Two British nationals in Europe tell The Local how the rules have impacted them.

'I feel exiled': How Brits in Europe are locked abroad with foreign partners

Europe is home to hundreds of thousands of British nationals, many of whom have foreign partners and children. But if they want to move to the UK to live and work it will soon become more difficult.

When it comes to getting a partner visa, the UK has some of the strictest rules in Europe. In addition to hefty fees and a healthcare surcharge, the Home Office requires British citizens and long-term residents who bring their foreign partner to the UK to have a minimum income showing they can support them without relying on the social security system. 

The minimum income up until now was set at £18,600 (€21,700), or £22,400 (€26,100) if the couple had one child, plus another £2,400 (€2,800) for each other child. 

But these income requirements will rise steeply from April 11th 2024.

How it works: What Brits in Europe should know about UK’s new minimum income rules

From this date the minimum a British national or long-term resident will need to earn if they want to return home will increase to £29,000 (€33,800) and up to £38,000 (€44,313) by spring 2025, although there will no longer be an additional amount for accompanying children.

Alternatively, families need to prove they have at least £62,500 (€72,884) in cash, which from 11 April will increase to £88,500 (€103,207).

‘Family life has been destroyed’

To put this in context the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford suggests that around 50 percent of UK employees earn less than the £29,000 threshold and 70 percent less than £38,700. The Observatory also says that while the number of people affected by the policy is small compared to the overall UK immigration (family visas represent 5 percent of all entry visas), the impacts on concerned families can be “very significant”. 

The Migration Observatory notes that other European countries apply income thresholds to sponsor foreign partners. Spain, for instance, requires sponsors to have an annual income equal to the social security salary. In Denmark, sponsors must not have claimed social benefits in the three years before the application. But in Spain and the US, the partner’s foreign income also counts towards the threshold.

So what does this mean for mixed British and international families living in Europe who might want or even need to return to the UK to live?

Campaigners have complained that many Britons with foreign partners have simply been “locked abroad” or families have been separated while they try to meet the minimum income or savings requirement. 

Reunite Families UK, a non-profit organisation supporting people affected by the UK spouse visa rules, says this policy causes distress, especially for children. 

Some 65 percent of respondents in research carried out by the group said that their child received a diagnosis of a mental health condition due to the separation of their parents.

“Since its introduction, this policy has destroyed the family life of countless people and children,” Matteo Besana, Advocacy and Campaigns Manager at Reunite Families UK said.

“Women have been forced to become single parents to their children and live away from their partner and the father of their children only because they didn’t meet the threshold.

“As shown by our research on the mental health impact of the policy, these are scars that, particularly for children, will be carried for the rest of their lives,” Besana said. 

The people most likely to be affected are women, who tend to earn less or not work because they took on caring responsibilities. Also heavily impacted are people under 30 and over 50 years of age, people living outside London and the Southeast of England where wages are higher, and those belonging to specific ethnicities, according to the Migration Observatory. 

The Local spoke to two British women, in Italy and Sweden, struggling to return to the UK with their families because of these rules.

More savings needed

Sarah Douglas, who has been living in Italy since 2007, was planning to return to Scotland with her Italian husband and three children. 

“It was always our long-term goal to move back to the UK after we had our children and once we’d have saved enough to buy a home in the UK,” she said.

“In hindsight, we should have gone after the Brexit referendum, but in the beginning it wasn’t clear what the final deal would be and I naively assumed that situations like mine would be taken into account and we would have the right to return… Once it did become clear, we were in the middle of the pandemic and it wasn’t the time to move,” she said. 

Having stayed home to take care of the children, Sarah will find it hard to land a job near her family in Scotland that meets the minimum income required to sponsor a foreign partner for a UK visa. 

Her husband, a computer programmer, has been trying to get an employment visa, “but most of them state that you must already have permission to work in the UK,” Sarah says. And applying for British citizenship is not an option for a non-UK resident spouse. 

‘People need to be aware’

Sarah and her husband are trying to save as much as they can, an alternative to the income requirement, but the amount they need is rising to almost  £90,000, meaning it may be a long time before they have enough to move home.

While the aim of the UK’s policy is to ensure families moving to the UK are not a burden on the taxpayer, the reality is that people arriving on a family visa are not able to claim any benefits from the UK government. 

“They should judge the overall financial viability of the family unit, rather than just the earning potential of the sponsoring partner,” Sarah says. 

“We could live well with my husband’s salary and he could work remotely. We are stable and financially secure, but because I don’t earn any money, they say we are not able to support ourselves.”

Sarah says that most of the British public are unaware of the minimum income requirement.

“People think if you are married, your husband is allowed to come to the UK, but when I say no, it doesn’t work like that, they are really surprised. A lot of people are not aware of how this could affect them,” she said.

Looking for a job from abroad

Another British women who lives in Sweden with her South African husband and two children and plans to move to the UK told The Local how the minimum income requirement had put them in a “precarious and stressful situation”. 

The woman, who preferred to remain anonymous said: “After having the two children, I was very fortunate to find a research position and do my PhD, which is a salaried position in Scandinavia, and now that I finished, we are looking to leave. 

“But I need a job in the UK to sponsor my husband, and as a new graduate with limited work experience, it is not easy. It is even more difficult when you are not in the country and I missed out on opportunities because they wanted an immediate start. I really don’t want to move without my whole family,” she said. 

She says the UK’s policy is “gendered and geographically discriminatory” because it makes life harder for women and also harder for anyone who is planning to move to a part of the country that isn’t in London, where salaries are higher. 

“I feel exiled from my country and separated from my family there,” she said. 

Her husband, she argues, has his own company and could continue working remotely from the UK, earning well above the requirement. He would also pay taxes and national insurance while having to pay the healthcare surcharge, a form of double taxation, she argues. But that would not entitle him to a visa. 

“Our house is on the market now. We have booked removal companies for the 6th of June. The dog is booked for his transport. I just think this policy is so out of touch with the modern world,” she said. 

Reunite Families UK has called on the government to recognise the right for British or settled citizens to bring their close family members to the UK and scrap the minimum income requirement. Alternatively, the group says the rules should take into consideration the earning potential of both partners and consider “the best interests of children”. 

A petition on the UK parliament website asks the government to reconsider the minimum income policy. If it reaches 100,000 signatures, it will have to be debated in parliament.

This article has been produced by Europe Street news.

SHOW COMMENTS