SHARE
COPY LINK

OIL

Italy oil and gas vote flops because of low turnout

A closely-watched Italian referendum on oil and gas drilling concessions failed to reach the required turnout threshold on Sunday, in a win for Prime Minister Matteo Renzi who had urged voters to stay home.

Italy oil and gas vote flops because of low turnout
Italy's ENI gas platforms Angela L and Angelina in the Adriatic sea are seen off Lido di Dante. Photo: Alberto Pizzoli/AFP

Pitting environmentalists against the government and big industry, the referendum was seen a key challenge for Renzi's centre-left Democratic Party (PD) after two years in office during which he has pushed through a string of pro-business and political reforms.

About 90 minutes after polls closed at 11:00 pm (2100 GMT), the interior ministry said near-complete figures showed turnout stood at around 32 percent.

Under Italy's referendum law, a referendum is only valid if more than 50 percent of the country's nearly 47 million registered electors cast their vote.

The result will be savoured by Renzi, who had openly called on Italians to shun the ballot in the hopes of sinking the referendum, a stance that frustrated the opposition and deepened a rift within his own camp.

The referendum centred around whether Italians wanted to repeal a new law about drilling near the country's coast.

The current legislation, passed in January, says existing concessions within 12 miles (19 kilometres) of the coast should remain valid until the fields are depleted – to the dismay of campaigners for renewable energy.

Environmentalists claim platforms near the shore present risks to health and protected habitats.

They argued that reversing the law would send a clear signal the country wants to go green and stop what they call “dirty deals” that benefit oil companies, in the wake of a recent scandal that saw a top minister resign over alleged favours to French oil giant Total.

But Renzi dismissed the referendum as “a hoax” this week and said a win for the “Yes” camp – backed by environmentalists and opposition parties – would lead to rig closures and massive job losses.

The referendum also fuelled a bitter internal battle within Renzi's party, with some PD members saying it was unacceptable for the premier to be the head of the pro-abstention campaign.

“Those who wanted to settle accounts at all costs have lost. The winners are the 11,000 people whose jobs were at risk,” Renzi said in a speech after the polls closed.

'Greenest country'

He added that he was ready to continue the dialogue about the country's energy policies and that he wanted Italy to become “the greenest country in Europe”.

A “Yes” victory would have been a heavy blow to the premier ahead of a constitutional reforms referendum in October, on which the 41-year-old has bet his political career.

As for the energy companies, it would mean that the 92 platforms within the 12-mile limit would have to start closing from 2018, with the last in 2034.

Observers had said ahead of the vote that the referendum outcome would have little effect on government income.

Concessions within the 12-mile band brought in a relatively modest €38 million ($43 million) in royalties in 2015, according to official data.

Opponents had warned that if the referendum failed, the door would be flung open to underhand dealings.

“The biggest favour to oil and gas – extending extraction indefinitely – allows them to avoid shelling out money to dismantle the platforms once the concessions have expired,” said Michele Emiliano, president of the Puglia region.

The “Yes” camp had argued that far fewer than 11,000 jobs were at risk, as many of the 92 platforms in question are unmanned.

They were also furious that Renzi refused to hold the referendum on the same day as local elections later this year, a decision which will cost the taxpayer €300 million ($338 million), according to the regions and environmentalists.

Genoa Mayor Marco Doria said it was “outrageous” they had been kept separate in the hope Italians would head to the beach instead of voting.

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

REFERENDUM

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum

Switzerland's decision to purchase US-made fighter jets could be put to a referendum,

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum
Swiss fighter jets. Photo: JOE KLAMAR / AFP

Switzerland’s government on Wednesday backed the purchase of 36 F-35A fighter jets from Lockheed Martin to replace its fleet and five Patriot air defence units from fellow US manufacturer Raytheon.

Switzerland’s current air defence equipment will reach the end of its service life in 2030 and has been undergoing a long and hotly-contested search for replacements.

“The Federal Council is confident that these two systems are the most suitable for protecting the Swiss population from air threats in the future,” the government said in a statement.

‘No Trump fighter jets’: Swiss don’t want to buy American planes

The decision will now be put to the Swiss parliament — and also risks being challenged at the ballot box, with left-wingers and an anti-militarist group looking to garner enough signatures to trigger a public vote.

The F-35A was chosen ahead of the Airbus Eurofighter; the F/A-18 Super Hornet by Boeing; and French firm Dassault’s Rafale.

For the ground-based air defence (GBAD) system, Patriot was selected ahead of SAMP/T by France’s Eurosam.

“An evaluation has revealed that these two systems offer the highest overall benefit at the lowest overall cost,” the government statement said. Switzerland is famously neutral. However, its long-standing position is one of armed neutrality and the landlocked European country has mandatory conscription for men.

“A fleet of 36 aircraft would be large enough to cover Switzerland’s airspace protection needs over the longer term in a prolonged situation of heightened tensions,” the government said.

“The air force must be able to ensure that Swiss airspace cannot be used by foreign parties in a military conflict.” 

Long path to decision 

Switzerland began to seek replacements for its ageing fleet of fighter jets more than a decade ago, but the issue has become caught up in a political battle in the wealthy Alpine nation.

The Swiss government has long argued for the need to quickly replace its 30 or so F/A-18 Hornets, which will reach the end of their lifespan in 2030, and the F-5 Tigers, which have been in service for four decades and are not equipped for night flights.

In 2014, the country looked set to purchase 22 Gripen E fighter jets from Swedish group Saab, only to see the public vote against releasing the funds needed to go forward with the multi-billion-dollar deal.

Bern launched a new selection process four years later, and a referendum last year to release six billion Swiss francs ($6.5 billion) for the purchase of the fighters of the government’s choice squeezed through with 50.1 percent of voters in favour.

During the referendum campaign, the government warned that without a swift replacement for its fleet, “Switzerland will no longer be in a position to protect and even less defend its airspace by 2030”.

Currently, the fleet does not have the capacity to support ground troops for reconnaissance missions or to intervene against ground targets.

Meanwhile Switzerland’s current GBAD system is also old and lacks the capacity to meet the widening spectrum of modern threats.

The military currently relies on a range of Rapier and Stinger short-range missiles that have been in service since 1963.

SHOW COMMENTS