SHARE
COPY LINK

NUCLEAR

Job cuts fuel security fears at nuclear plants

Questions have been raised about future security and safety at France's nuclear plants with the country's nuclear energy Areva set to cut thousands of jobs in the industry.

Job cuts fuel security fears at nuclear plants
Protesters break into Fessenheim to demonstrate how lax security is at France's nuclear power stations. Photo: AFP

Unions at French atomic energy giant Areva voiced concern over plant security on Wednesday a day after the company said it
would shed 2,700 French jobs in a two-year major restructuring amid fears that more jobs will go.

Management “are trying to play down” the losses but “there are clearly 4,000 jobs that are to go,” Michel Toudret of France's largest French trade union confederation CFDT told AFP.

The CFDT estimates that, taking into account jobs already shed since the start of this year outside the parameters of the restructuring, the firm was looking at “3,000 to 4,000 departures in France.

Areva group, with 44,000 staff worldwide, is targeting some 6,000 job losses globally, though largely on the basis of a voluntary agreement signed Monday by four of five French unions — the CFDT included.

Toudret said his union would be “very vigilant to see how plants will operate after these departures — what worries us is that those who remain will comprise a reduced staff taking on the same quantity of work” as before the layoffs.

Toudret said he was awaiting details on the future of “sensitive and critical posts” at the majority state-owned group.

Another union leader, Force Ouvriere's Philippe Launay, said it was “out of the question for us (to accept) measures placing in doubt employee security, their environment and installation security.” Launay called on management to ensure that sufficient staff are taken on to cover potential shortfalls, a measure foreseen in Monday's accord.

Pierre-Emmanuel Joly, for the CGT union — the only major union that did not sign up to the deal — said it showed the cuts were too deep and could undermine security.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

ENERGY

Why Germany’s nuclear exit is posing tough questions about its energy future

The Bavarian village of Gundremmingen is so proud of its nuclear power station that its coat of arms is graced with a giant golden atom.

Why Germany's nuclear exit is posing tough questions about its energy future
Gundremmingen nuclear power plant. Photo: DPA

But change is coming to the village, with the plant facing imminent closure under Germany’s energy transition policy.

Former village mayor Wolfgang Mayer’s house has direct views of the imposing complex with its two 160-metre cooling towers — taller than the spires of Cologne Cathedral.

The plant still produces 10 billion kWh of power per year, though parts of it have already been shut down — enough to provide the entire Munich metropolitan region with electricity.

The power station will be decommissioned on December 31, 2021, along with two other facilities in northern Germany.

By the end of 2022, Germany will have achieved its goal of completely phasing out nuclear power, set by Chancellor Angela Merkel on May 30, 2011, in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

SEE ALSO: Berlin agrees to compensate power firms for nuclear phase out

The plan represented a dramatic change of course by Merkel’s ruling conservatives, who just a few months earlier had agreed to extend the lifespan of Germany’s oldest power stations.

But it was met with widespread public support in a country with a powerful anti-nuclear movement, fuelled first by fears of a Cold War conflict and then by disasters such as Chernobyl.

Village church

In Gundremmingen, however, the decision has been a tough pill to swallow.

The nuclear power station has been “as much a part of the village as the church” and it feels as though “something is dying”, said Gerlinde Hutter, owner of a local guest house.

According to Meyer, it will take at least 50 years to remove all radioactive material from the site after the plant has been decommissioned.
The German government is still looking for a long-term storage site for the country’s residual nuclear waste.

Gundremmingen is not the only German village facing big changes as the country strives to implement its energy transition strategy.

Renewables have seen a spectacular rise since 2011 and in 2020 made up more than 50 percent of Germany’s energy mix for the first time, according to the Fraunhofer research institute — compared with less than 25 percent ten years ago.

The declining importance of nuclear power (12.5 percent in 2020) “has been compensated for by the expansion of renewable energies”, Claudia Kemfert, an energy expert at the DIW economic research institute, told AFP.

Nuclear power stations have therefore not been replaced by coal, though the fossil fuel does still represent almost a quarter of the electricity mix.

The gas dilemma

In fact, the phase-out of nuclear energy has been joined by another plan, announced in 2019, to close all of Germany’s coal-fired power stations by 2038.

This presents a particular challenge for Germany, which remains the world’s leading producer of lignite.

Mining for the brown coal, which is highly polluting, continues to lead to the destruction of villages in the west of the country in order to expand huge open-cast mines.

If Germany is to free itself from lignite, renewables such as wind, solar, biomass and hydropower will have to make up 65 percent of the energy mix by 2030.

Yet the country, which has long been at the forefront of wind energy in Europe, installed only 1.65 gigawatts (GW) of wind farms last year — the lowest level in a decade, according to the WindEurope advocacy group.

To meet the government’s targets, Germany would have to add 9.8 GW of solar and 5.9 GW of onshore wind annually, according to Kemfert.

But the development of new areas for wind or photovoltaic energy production is complex, with plans often coming up against resistance from local residents and the risk of damage to the landscape.

And unless storage and distribution can be improved via so-called virtual power plants, these new forms of energy do not have the same stability as thermal or nuclear power.

To secure its supply, Germany could therefore be tempted to build more gas-fired power stations.

But this would risk reinforcing its dependence on Russia, as illustrated by the controversy surrounding the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.

A gas-fired power station is already in the works for the town of Leipheim, just around the corner from Gundremmingen.

SHOW COMMENTS