SHARE
COPY LINK

MOVIE

‘He’s back’: Hitler movie hits nerve in Germany

Imagine Hitler wakes up in today's Berlin, is mistaken for a hilarious impersonator of the Nazi leader and ends up a TV celebrity, widely cheered for voicing his demented worldview.

'He's back': Hitler movie hits nerve in Germany
Oliver Masucci as Hitler. Photo: DPA

That's the premise of “He's Back” (“Er ist wieder da”), a biting social satire by author Timur Vermes, the movie version of which premiered in German cinemas this week.

In the bestselling what-if novel published three years ago, Hitler is baffled to find himself in a multicultural Germany led by a woman, Chancellor Angela Merkel.

He discovers TV chefs, Wikipedia and the fact that Poland still exists before he ends up a small-screen star, in a social commentary on society, mass media and celebrity hype.

The film, however, goes a step further and sprinkles the story with documentary-style scenes — in the style of Sacha Baron Cohen's 2006 comedy “Borat” — giving the screen version a more disturbing twist.

In the real-life scenes, lead actor Oliver Masucci — replete with Hitler moustache and uniform — is seen getting rousing receptions from ordinary people, many of whom pose for “selfies” with him.

Tourists and football fans cheer the fake Hitler at Berlin's Brandenburg Gate, in a Bavarian village and elsewhere, and elderly people pour their hearts out to him, often voicing extremist views.

“Yes, bring back labour camps,” says one citizen to the dictator.

Such scenes have touched a raw nerve in Germany which, amid a record influx of refugees, has also suffered an upsurge in xenophobic protests and attacks against asylum-seekers.

“There is a smouldering anger among the people, like in the 1930s,” says the Hitler character, with visible satisfaction.

Masucci, best known as a stage actor, told Bild daily about his mixed feelings while shooting the unscripted scenes with people on the street.

“During shooting, I realised: I didn't really have to perform — people felt a need to talk, they wanted to pour their hearts out to a fatherly Hitler who was listening to them,” he said.

“I found it disturbing how quickly I could win people over. I mean, they were talking to Hitler.”

Hitler in the film also meets members of the populist-nationalist Alternative for Germany party and the neo-Nazi NPD, while the final scenes show news footage of far-right mobs and a rally by the PEGIDA movement, short for “Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the Occident”.

The release of the movie has touched off broad debate in a country where guilt over World War II and the Holocaust continues to influence political debate.

“A fake Hitler, a small moustache clearly helped people lose their inhibitions and… allowed insights into Germany's dark side,” found the daily Berliner Morgenpost.

After all, it said, Hitler, in a figurative sense, “never really left”.

“The far-right ideology smoulders to this day and has found new forums… in the form of the Alternative for Germany and the PEGIDA movement,” it said.

A review by news portal Spiegel Online was more critical: “Borat with a bar-moustache and side parting: It sounds like a clever flick,” it said. “But really it's rather silly.

“Because what would be an appropriate response from a passer-by to the Hitler masquerade? It reveals nothing, neither people's indifference nor their hidden sympathies.”

Tagesspiegel daily pointed out that “Hitler sells”, in a trend that has been dubbed the 'banalisation of evil' and has turned the monstrous historical figure into something of a commercialised pop icon.

“70 years after the end of the 'Third Reich', which left countries destroyed and millions dead, the dictator has shrunk to become a caricature, either loaded with nonsense or with meaning, in books, cinema, TV, Internet,” it said.

At the public premiere Thursday, a Berlin audience roared with laughter during the funnier moments, but quietened during some of the real-life footage.

One viewer, who gave her name as Angela, thought “it was all a bit too forced. The film is playing too hard on the fear about Nazi ideology, and they only picked out the worst sequences.”

Another viewer, Tobias, was more disturbed, given the real-life resurgence of the populist far-right.

“This is real,” he said. “We need to debate this. It shows how easily people can be manipulated. This is the right moment, because the danger is here now.”

 

IMMIGRATION

Danish MPs agree to send asylum seekers outside Europe

Denmark's parliament on Thursday adopted a law enabling it to open asylum reception centres outside Europe where applicants would live while their case is processed, with the host country also taking them in if granted asylum.

Danish MPs agree to send asylum seekers outside Europe
An Eritrean refugee child stands under an umbrella at Mai Aini Refugee camp, in Ethiopia, on January 30, 2021. Danish media have mentioned Ethiopia as a possible site for the camp. Photo: Eduardo Soteras / AFP

Known for having one of Europe’s harshest stances on immigration, the wealthy Scandinavian country aims to deter migrants from coming to Denmark at all.

Despite criticism from humanitarian organisations and some leftwing parties, the bill, proposed by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s Social Democrats, was adopted by 70 votes to 24.

Under the law, asylum seekers would have to submit an application in person at the Danish border and then be flown to an asylum centre outside Europe while their application is being processed by the host country.

If the application is approved and the person is granted refugee status, he or she would be given the right to live in the host country, but not in Denmark.

If it is rejected, the migrant would have to leave the host country. No country has agreed to collaborate with Denmark yet, but the government says it is in talks with five to 10 countries, without identifying them.

Danish media have mentioned Egypt, Eritrea and Ethiopia as possibilities. Denmark is meanwhile known to be in talks with Rwanda.

The two have signed a memorandum of understanding on asylum and migration cooperation, though the document doesn’t specifically cover external asylum processing.

The UN refugee agency, the UNHCR, criticised the law as “contrary to the principles of international refugee cooperation.”

“By initiating such a drastic and restrictive change in Danish refugee legislation, Denmark risks starting a domino effect, where other countries in Europe and in neighbouring regions will also explore the possibility of limiting the protection of refugees on their soil,” UNHCR’s representative in the Nordic and Baltic countries, Henrik Nordentoft, told news agency Ritzau.

Denmark has repeatedly made headlines in recent years with its anti-immigration policies, including its official “zero refugees” target, its withdrawal of residence permits from Syrians now that it deems parts of the war-torn country safe, and its crackdown on Danish “ghettos” in a bid to reduce the number of “non-Western” residents.

SHOW COMMENTS