SHARE
COPY LINK
THE DANISH WAY

DANISHWAY

Denmark’s flat power structure creates respect

Opinion columnist Jessica Alexander writes that Danes' lack of reverence for so-called authority figures builds trust, respect and empathy.

Denmark's flat power structure creates respect
In Denmark, the author argues that a police officer is granted the same respect as a janitor. Photo: Colourbox
I have always marveled at my husband’s ability to stay calm not only under pressure but also in the presence of authority. When I am in the US, the mere site of a police car can make me shudder. Am I doing everything right? Am I driving ok? Do all my lights work? He laughs at me because he thinks I am overly paranoid. I say its because he doesn´t understand how frustrating it is to be pulled over. He still maintains that I am paranoid.
 
Over the years I have noticed his confidence around all ‘authority figures’ and my general underlying fear and reverence for them. I began to wonder where this stemmed from. How was he always so cool, calm and confident whereas I get a little skittish in the face of ‘power’?
 
Then I learned about the concept of power distance. Power distance is a term that describes how people belonging to a specific culture view power relationships (superior-subordinate relationships).
 
People who come from cultures with a high power distance are very deferential to figures of authority and generally accept an unequal distribution of power, while individuals in cultures with a low power distance readily question authority and expect to participate in decisions that affect them.
 
I discovered that Denmark has one of the lowest power distance rankings in the world while Mexico, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and China have some of the highest. The United States falls somewhere in the middle.
 
In Danish schools, kids call teachers by their first names. Teachers have an important job but they don't require a Mr. or Mrs. in front of their name to distinguish them. Students, meanwhile, are encouraged to use their voice and question what is taught and to participate in the learning process as equals.
 
Parents don´t govern with fear either. So the power distance is also low between parents and kids. Respect goes both ways between an adult and a child. All ages of children have a voice and they are really listened to, even the toddlers. Kids aren’t brushed aside with ”you do as I say because I said so (and I am important)”. 
 
Parents are considered important because they have earned that importance through listening, guiding and explaining things rather than hitting or barking rules with no explanation. 
 
Compared to other cultures, there are also a lot less rules for children.  Parents and teachers trust kids a lot more to be trustworthy (at all ages).  And this lack of rule focus and low power distance creates a very different kind of confidence in the long run – both in yourself because you understand rules as having real meaning and in the face of others because you have learned not to be afraid or blindly revering of ‘power’.
 
Authority figures are seen as people with a job just like everyone else. They are just as respected as a janitor. Some people think that this kind of system could create anarchy, but it does just the opposite. 
 
When people are taught to respect others and are treated with respect, all across the power board, they become respectful in turn.
 
And an added upside to this is that it makes you much more open to seeing people without a Mr, Mrs, Dr, MBA or PhD attached to their names as important too. 
 
The ability to discover something in everyone is quite possibly the most powerful lesson of all.
 
Jessica AlexanderJessica Alexander is an American author who co-wrote 'The Danish Way of Parenting: A Guide to Raising the Happiest Kids in the World'. She has been married to a Dane for over 13 years and has always been fascinated by cultural differences. She speaks four languages and currently lives in Rome with her husband and two children. Her book can be purchased via Amazon and Saxo

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

DANISHWAY

Is the Danish concept of free play in danger?

Parenting expert Jessica Alexander worries that even in Denmark, where play is seen as a necessary part of a child’s life, free play could be pushed out by a focus on competitiveness.

Is the Danish concept of free play in danger?
Can 'play' be packaged and sold? Photo: famveldman /Iris/Scanpix
I recently took a tour around the International School of Billund, Denmark which is backed by the Lego Foundation and situated in the Lego capital of the world, so to speak. 
 
For those who don’t know, Lego is a Danish brand and it is a combination of the words 'leg godt' or ‘play well’. It’s one of the building blocks of Denmark’s firm belief that children need a lot of unstructured playtime to be healthy.
 
Rows and rows of Lego-based learning could be seen throughout the school along with tinkering walls, creative corners and design centres where kids were making clothes in Project Runway style rooms as part of their after-school programming. The school is built on a philosophy of learning through play, and teachers strive to incorporate play and creativity into the curriculum at every stage, from kindergarten through students' early teens. This is special even for Denmark, where play is seen as a necessary part of a child’s life.
 
While I was there, I ran into a group of Harvard researchers who were working together with teachers to investigate what it means to put play at the heart of a school’s curriculum and how one measures this.  The idea is to create an educational framework and tools that can be used by other educators interested in making learning more playful. 
 
While I think this research is truly fascinating, I also feel a little bit nervous about it.
 
When my book ‘The Danish Way of Parenting’ was first released, I did several interviews with my co-author about play and what the future might look like in countries where free play had declined in favour of scheduled, adult-led activities. 
 
Some studies, for example, show that the amount of a child’s free play in America has dropped 50 percent since the 1950s just to put it in perspective.
 
One thing I kept repeating in these interviews was my fear that free play might one day become an oxymoron or commercialized. I was afraid that, as soon as it was proven to be serious learning, someone would surely want to measure it, package it and ultimately sell it. 
 
Let me say that the International School of Billund is not interested in selling its findings or quantifying the “learning results” for any toy or technique. School officials know that they are investigating something that is almost inherently unmeasurable, but they believe that it’s worth it if it empowers children to see learning as a pleasurable lifelong pursuit. I think what they are doing is very interesting and the school is brilliant.
 
My concern, however, is that at some point, somebody will try to quantify the concept of “play” and sell it. And the idea of charging for play feels a bit like selling an overpriced apple and labelling it as a diet product. It defeats what should just be a natural healthy part of life, not a specialized technique or super food. 
 
I can already foresee parents cutting back on the violin, Chinese and organic cupcake making lessons to enrol their kids in free play courses where children could get score cards on how much their social skills, negotiation and empathy capabilities increase. Where they can get graded for their collaboration, self-control and resiliency. All of these things, unfortunately, completely defeat the purpose of why play is so good in the first place. 
 
Free play is a child’s way of making sense of their worlds. It’s their way of coping with anxiety and expressing themselves and feeling in control of their own destiny. This is where some of their sense of self-esteem gets developed and this can’t be controlled, coaxed or measured by an adult. 
 
I often wonder if that competitive edge everyone wants to buy for their kids is cutting away at the very self-esteem we want to build up. What if kids really just need more freedom to feel in control of their own lives?
 
All of this pressure is coming from an ever increasingly competitive society. It’s not coming from kids. They are just mirroring what we want. If we could relax ourselves, sand down our competitive edges, let kids be kids and trust them more to trust in themselves, we might see a drop in anxiety and a true increase in happiness down the line. And wouldn’t those be measurable results we could be proud of?
 
Jessica AlexanderJessica Alexander is an American author who co-wrote 'The Danish Way of Parenting: A Guide to Raising the Happiest Kids in the World'. She has been married to a Dane for over 13 years and has always been fascinated by cultural differences. She speaks four languages and currently lives in Rome with her husband and two children. Her book can be purchased via Amazon and Saxo
SHOW COMMENTS