SHARE
COPY LINK
THE LOCAL LIST

MUNICIPALITIES

Are these the five worst places to live in Sweden?

Sweden is a great place to be, from its vibrant capital to cute, picturesque towns in the countryside. But even within this Nordic paradise, there are some real dumps. Here's our guide to the five municipalities that ended up at the bottom of an annual ranking of places to live in Sweden.

Are these the five worst places to live in Sweden?
Högsby has been named as the worst place to live in Sweden. Photo: Janerik Henriksson/TT

On Friday the Fokus magazine published its annual 'Best Place To Live' ranking of all 290 Swedish municipalities, based on factors ranging from unemployment to teacher-pupil ratios, property prices, number of people on benefits and tax rates.

In this year's ranking, the capital Stockholm nabbed first place, just ahead of university towns Lund and Uppsala. They are all wealthy, well-educated and well-connected cities which come high in the ranking every year. But what about the municipalities that ended up at the bottom of the table? We've put their 2014 ranking in brackets after the name.

1. Högsby – 290 (281)

Population: 5,782


Högsby main street. Photo: Janerik Henriksson/TT

Högsby in Småland in southern Sweden is connected by rail to Kalmar to the south and Linköping to the north. The stream Emån flows through the village and people living next to the water frequently find their basements flooded when it breaks its banks during heavy rain storms in spring. This town's main tourist attraction is the Greta Garbo museum, dedicated to the Swedish movie star whose mother was born in Högsby.

The village has been at the bottom of Fokus' table for the past few years, often marked down for not being “family friendly” enough with poor access to a variety of schools. It suffers from many of the same problems as other rural towns in Sweden, with more people leaving the area than moving there and a high unemployment rate of 10.2 percent (compared to the Swedish average of 7.8 percent).

2. Ljusnarsberg – 289 (287)

Population: 4,913


The former mine in Yxsjö, Ljusnarsberg. Photo: Peter Korkala/Wikimedia Commons

The average age of a Ljusnarsberg resident is high, 47.2 years old compared to the Swedish average of 41.2. Once a booming industry area in the mountainous central Swedish region of Bergslagen, Ljusnarsberg has struggled to regain its former glory after the last of its iron ore mines closed in 1978. Many of the ruins still remain and much like Högsby it struggles with a high unemployment rate of 11.8 percent in 2014.

Today, the only product from Ljusnarsberg which ever reaches beyond Sweden's borders comes from its 'capital' town Kopparberg, home to Kopparbergs Brewery, which makes the world famous Swedish fruit cider. In 2002 the municipality held a referendum on changing its name to Kopparberg, which would arguably have helped the area to market itself. A majority voted against.

3. Storfors – 288 (288)

Population: 4,106


Timber on the roadside in Storfors. Photo:  Fredrik Persson/SCANPIX

Storfors in Värmland in central Sweden has remained on a solid 288th place since last year. The small municipality is home to the controversial Lundsberg boarding school, attended by Sweden's Prince Carl Philip in his youth. This is really its only claim to fame. Lundsberg is also the main employer in the area, which had an unemployment rate of 14.2 percent 2014.

Four hundred years ago, the area was known for its production of pipes for revolvers, an industry that has lived on – albeit in a slightly different shape. Today, most of the factories manufacture heavy pipes for the oil and gas industry. But even this long-lived industry is struggling, and OSTP, one of the main firms, announced earlier this year it was going to dismantle its factory after several years of heavy financial losses.

4. Ragunda – 287 (281)

Population: 5,440


The Thai pavilion in Utanede, Ragunda. Photo:  Denny Calvo / SCANPIX

One in ten people in Ragunda municipality in northern Sweden is unemployed. It is home to nine water power plants which together produce around 10 percent of Sweden's water-powered electricity.

Ragunda's main tourist attraction is rather random: a Thai pavilion adored with gold-foil ornaments worth around three million Swedish kronor (or 14 million Thai bath), gifted to the municipality by Thailand's deputy prime minister, built in 1999. The reason? To commemorate fifth King of Siam Chulalongkorn's visit to the village Utanede back in 1897. The royal was visiting Sweden's King Oscar II for the Stockholm World Fair, who decided he wanted to show his royal colleague the real Sweden. If the king had known in 1897 that it would be voted one of the worst municipalities in Sweden in 2015, perhaps he would have gone elsewhere.

5. Överkalix – 286 (279)

Population: 3,409


The Överkalix skyline. Photo:  Leif R Jansson/FLT-PICA

Överkalix in the far north of Sweden suffers from a decreasing and aging population. The average age of its residents is 49.4 years.

Traditionally, Överkalix was supported by agriculture and forestry, but as the two industries slowly died out over the later part of the last century the population dwindled from around 6,000 in the 1970s to nearly half as many in 2015. Today, situated close to the border with Finland, it is mainly a commuter town to nearby Luleå (that's 'nearby' in northern Swedish terms; the distance between the towns is 108 kilometres).

Have you visited these municipalities and are a big fan? Defend them in the comments below.

READ ALSO: The six cutest Swedish towns you've never heard of

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COST OF LIVING

Norway is world’s second-most expensive country this year

Only Switzerland was ranked higher than Norway in a list of the most expensive countries in the world for living costs in 2020.

Norway is world’s second-most expensive country this year
File photo: AFP

The list, compiled by business magazine CEO World, ranks 132 countries in order of living costs based on data from a range of studies and media.

Parameters encompassed by the analysis include accommodation, clothing, taxi fares, utility, internet, the price of groceries, transport, and eating out. The data was used to compile a score for each country within five metrics: cost of living, rent, groceries, eating out and purchasing power.

The metrics were then given a value using New York City as a control: if a country has a score of over 100, it is more expensive than New York.

Three countries did in fact achieve this with their overall score: Switzerland (122.4), Norway (101.43) and Iceland (100.48).

As such, Norway is ranked by the magazine as the second-most expensive country to live in the world this year.

Nordic neighbour Denmark was not far behind in 5th place with an index of 83, with Sweden the cheapest of the three Scandinavian countries in 23rd (69.85).

Japan was the final country in the top 5, in 4th place.

The United Kingdom was placed 27th (67.28), Ireland 13th (75.91), the United States 20th (71.05), Canada 24th (67.62) and Australia 16th (73.54).

Looking at the metrics individually, Norway’s performance was variable.

The Nordic nation was the 12th-most expensive country on the cost of rent index. For groceries, it placed third just behind South Korea and with Switzerland still far ahead as the most expensive.

Norway is also the third-most expensive country to eat at a restaurant – behind Switzerland and Iceland.

For local purchasing power, Norway is lower on the list, in 17th.

READ ALSO: What are the best ways to save money in Norway?

SHOW COMMENTS