SHARE
COPY LINK

SMOKING

Balcony smoking times can be limited: court

Smokers take note! The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) on Friday have declared that the smell of smoke can be limited to certain times of the day after a couple sued their cigarette-smoking neighbours for stinking up their afternoon coffee time.

Balcony smoking times can be limited: court
Photo: DPA

The BGH said that second-hand cigarette smoke from a neighbouring balcony is a "substantial nuisance" and could be regulated by local authorities.

The decision made set no specific restrictions, but instead the ruling makes allowances for limitations set on a case-by-case basis in favour of those who complain about too much cigarette smoke coming from neighbours.

Now the court of origin in Potsdam has to rule further. There, local authorities will decide how to regulate smoking times in the region in the first court decision of its kind

A pair of pensioners from Premnitz in Brandenburg took their downstairs neighbours to court when they said the second-hand smoke wafting from their balcony was excessive and disturbing.

"We only want some consideration," said the 82-year-old man who brought the suit forward after the local court's first ruling.

He and his wife live above a smoking couple and had previously brought them before courts in Potsdam. When local authorities ruled in favour of the smokers, the couple decided to appeal the decision to the higher authorities.

Following the BGH's decision, the Potsdam district court has to decide how bad the problem really is and what limits to place on the smokers.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BUSINESS

French court hands Amazon €90,000-per-day fine over contracts

French authorities on Wednesday slapped a €90,000-per-day fine on e-commerce giant Amazon until it removes abusive clauses in its contracts with businesses using its platform to sell their goods.

French court hands Amazon €90,000-per-day fine over contracts

The anti-fraud Direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes (DGCCRF) service said the online sales giant’s contracts with third-party sellers who use its Amazon.fr website contain “unbalanced” clauses.

“The company Amazon Services Europe did not comply completely with an injunction it was served and it is now subject to a fine of €90,000 per day of delay” in applying the changes, the DGCCRF said in a statement.

It also urged the platform to conform with European rules on equity and transparency for firms using online platforms.

Amazon said the order would harm consumers.

“The changes imposed by the DGCCRF will stop us from effectively protecting consumers and permit bad actors to set excessive prices or spam our clients with commercial offers,” the e-commerce giant said in a statement.

“We will comply with the DGCCRF’s decision but we absolutely do not understand it and we are challenging it in court,” responded the e-commerce giant in a statement.

Amazon said the clauses that the DGCCRF has ordered removed had, for example “prevented the appearance of exorbitant prices for mask and hydroalcoholic gel during the pandemic”.

In 2019, Amazon was fined €4 million for “manifestly unbalanced” contract clauses with third-party sellers on its site in a case brought by the DGCCRF.

SHOW COMMENTS