SHARE
COPY LINK
OPINION

DIVORCE

Danish custody law is an inescapable trap

The author of a new book on Danish custody law argues that Denmark's focus on forced cooperation leaves mothers – and particularly foreign mothers – feeling like they have no way out.

Danish custody law is an inescapable trap
"It is a peculiar Danish notion that you can legislate on personal characteristics such as ‘responsibility’ and ‘cooperation'," the author writes. Photo: Colourbox
The Danish custody law is a trap. And if you become pregnant in Denmark or if you bring children to live in Denmark, you are already trapped. Except you won’t know it until it is too late.
 
The Danish custody law, the ‘Parental Responsibility Act’, prioritizes shared parenting over children’s need for protection. Children must be handed over for visitation almost regardless of the circumstances. The Danish law requires that divorced parents 'cooperate' even when there is a history of violence or abuse. 
 
These parents are traumatized because the Danish system prohibits them from protecting their children. Lifting the burden of proof is almost impossible. Instead, there is an increasing tendency to place protective parents under suspicion for lying. 
 
A fragmented custody system
When trying to resolve the situation, these parents come up against a custody system so fragmented that cases can circulate between the State Administration (Statsforvaltningen), social services and the courts for years. 
 
A sample assessment indicates that once lost in the Danish custody swamp, it takes an average of 5.4 years to complete a high-conflict case. And even resourceful and well-educated parents are left traumatized and unemployed on welfare. 
 
Protective parents feel caught behind a glass wall. No one sees it coming. But no one can pass through it. They struggle to maintain hope that one day, they will be free again.
 
‘Help’ means it’s time to take cover
It is assumed that a child's failure to thrive is not caused by stressful visitation agreements but rather by the lack of cooperation between the parents. Therefore, social services regularly send divorced couples into year-long mediation processes with the purpose of improving their cooperation. Violence is reframed as a ‘disagreement’ for which the parties are given equal responsibility.
 
Listening to tape recordings of such meetings it becomes apparent that when a victim of violence reacts to verbal abuse during mediation, she is automatically seen as participating in the ‘conflict’. While nothing is done to stop the violations, the protective parent is coerced into ‘cooperation’ using threats that if she doesn’t, the child may be removed.
 
It is a peculiar Danish notion that you can legislate on personal characteristics such as ‘responsibility’ and ‘cooperation’. This idea has caused the development of an extensive state system that will ‘help’ you to think and feel in such a way as to make this law a success.
 
What these cases have shown is that if any entity within the Danish system offers you ‘help’, it means it’s time to take cover. Danish ’help’ is not something to strive for.
 
The production of silent consent
It is astonishing to witness how many cases the Danes dismiss as irrelevant or isolated. The existence of protective parents is not recognized in Denmark and the media consistently portray them as vengeful and harassing people whose aim is to damage the other parent.
 
The system manufactures silent consent. Speaking out is regarded as seeking conflict and parents who ‘seek conflict’ are threatened with their children being removed. Danish authorities have defined what it means to have parental ability. And those who do not ‘cooperate’ with the other parent by definition have no parental ability. 
 
The cases in my network may be just the tip of an iceberg, the depth of which no one takes an interest in. However, the stories bear witness to a country losing itself in an ideology with no basis in reality.
 
Foreigners are shocked
We have had several tragic cases in which a foreign mother or child was not protected against violence or abuse. In such cases, when the mother tried to return to her home country, the children were taken from her. 
 
While it is legal to move within the country, moving a child to a new school is considered justification for placing them with the other parent. Thus, moving involves a risk of losing the children. You can argue that this will limit your career and life options, but do keep your voice down. Such arguments are considered selfish.
 
My book is a cautionary tale of a fairy tale country, which markets itself as having the happiest people on Earth. But in the shadows of the Danish custody law are those who have been sacrificed at the altar of this illusive image.
 
Had I not examined case files and listened to tape recordings of these mediation sessions, I would have written it all off as an angry activist movement. However, the fact is that if you do have a child in Denmark, or if you bring children to live here, you have to accept living without the same rights and opportunities as other people. 
 
The biggest power pig winsIn her capacity as psychologist and author of a book on the dark side of the Danish custody law, Libbie Bouffon is connected to a network of more than 200 parents – mostly mothers. Her e-book, 'The biggest power pig wins', deals with mothers struggling with the Danish custody law and is available within Denmark here and internationally here. Libbie Bouffon is a pseudonym. The author's real identity is known to The Local. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Denmark’s finance minister to take ten weeks’ paternity leave

Denmark's Finance Minister, Nicolai Wammen, has announced that he will go on parental leave for ten weeks this summer, writing on Facebook that he was "looking forward to spending time with the little boy."

Denmark's finance minister to take ten weeks' paternity leave

Wammen said he would be off work between June 5th and August 13th, with Morten Bødskov, the country’s business minister standing in for him in his absence.

“On June 5th I will go on parental leave with Frederik, and I am really looking forward to spending time with the little boy,” Wammen said in the post announcing his decision, alongside a photograph of himself together with his son, who was born in November.

Denmark’s government last March brought in a new law bringing in 11 weeks’ use-it-or-lose-it parental leave for each parent in the hope of encouraging more men to take longer parental leave. Wammen is taking 9 weeks and 6 days over the summer. 

The new law means that Denmark has met the deadline for complying with an EU directive requiring member states earmark nine weeks of statutory parental leave for fathers.

This is the second time Bødskov has substituted for Wammen, with the minister standing in for him as acting Minister of Taxation between December 2020 and February 2021. 

“My parental leave with Christian was quite simply one of the best decisions in my life and I’m looking forward to having the same experience with Frederik,” Wammen wrote on Facebook in November alongside a picture of him together with his son.

Male politicians in Denmark have tended to take considerably shorter periods of parental leave than their female colleagues. 

Minister of Employment and Minister for Equality Peter Hummelgaard went on parental leave for 8 weeks and 6 days in 2021. Mattias Tesfaye took one and a half months away from his position as Denmark’s immigration minister in 2020. Troels Lund Poulsen – now acting defence minister – took three weeks away from the parliament took look after his new child in 2020. Education minister Morten Østergaard took two weeks off in 2012. 

SHOW COMMENTS