Europe's news in English

COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Outcry over asylum home in Styrian village

A new centre for asylum seekers has caused an uproar in the village of Spital am Semmering, Styria, after residents and local politicians said they were not consulted in the matter.

Published: 10 September 2014 16:18 CEST

Outcry over asylum home in Styrian village

Haus Semmering. Photo: APA/epa

On Monday the Interior Ministry announced that the former hotel Haus Semmering would provide accommodation for 150 asylum seekers, and on Tuesday the first occupants moved in, mayor Reinhard Reisinger (SPÖ) said on Wednesday.

SPÖ social affairs minister for Styria Siegfried Schrittwieser said that the Interior Ministry had spoken of a plan to find accommodation in the area but no one had said it would be so large. “This is unacceptable,” he said.

The owner of the former three-star hotel is a Slovakian entrepreneur who reportedly offered it to the government as her children had no interest in running it. The Interior Ministry said on Wednesday that it would not be a reception centre, like Traiskirchen in Lower Austria, but a child care facility.

Reisinger said that initially the ministry plans to accommodate between 100 and 150 refugees but he fears that the hotel will eventually be “crammed full” as it has room for around 300 beds.

There are already 70 asylum seekers who are being housed in the community. “We’re talking about 360 strangers coming to live in a small village of just 600 houses,” the mayor said.

“People are talking about selling their homes and moving away, and their children are scared,” he added. The local council said the ministry was creating “unreasonable ghettoes” and said that the accommodation should be spread out more fairly across the provinces.

Styria’s governor Franz Voves (SPÖ) said that legally there is little that the province and the community can do.

The Interior Ministry has said that it doesn’t plan to house more than 200 asylum seekers in Spital am Semmering.

The hotel is still listed on online travel booking sites, and the reviews vary greatly.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.

Become a Member to leave a comment.

Border centres and 'safe' states: The EU's major asylum changes explained

The parliament’s main political groups overcame opposition from far-right and far-left parties to pass the new migration and asylum pact — enshrining a difficult overhaul nearly a decade in the making.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the vote, saying it will “secure European borders… while ensuring the protection of the fundamental rights” of migrants.

“We must be the ones to decide who comes to the European Union and under what circumstances, and not the smugglers and traffickers,” she said.

EU governments — a majority of which previously approved the pact — also welcomed its adoption.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Greece’s migration minister, Dimitris Kairidis, both called it “historic”.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Europe was acting “effectively and humanely” while Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi hailed what he termed “the best possible compromise”.

But there was dissent when Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban derided the reform as “another nail in the coffin of the European Union”.

“Unity is dead, secure borders are no more. Hungary will never give in to the mass migration frenzy! We need a change in Brussels in order to Stop Migration!” Orban said in a post on social media platform X.

For very different reasons, migrant charities also slammed the pact, which includes building border centres to hold asylum-seekers and sending some to outside “safe” countries.

Amnesty International said the EU was “shamefully” backing a deal “they know will lead to greater human suffering” while the Red Cross federation urged member states “to guarantee humane conditions for asylum seekers and migrants affected”.

The vote itself was initially disrupted by protesters yelling: “The pact kills — vote no!”, while dozens of demonstrators outside the parliament building in Brussels held up placards with slogans decrying the reform.

The parliament’s far-left grouping, which maintains that the reforms are incompatible with Europe’s commitment to upholding human rights, said it was a “dark day”.

It was “a pact with the devil,” said Damien Careme, a lawmaker from the Greens group.

Border centres

As well as Orban, other far-right lawmakers also opposed the passage of the 10 laws making up the pact as insufficient to stop irregular migrants they accuse of spreading insecurity and threatening to “submerge” European identity.

Marine Le Pen, the figurehead of France’s far-right National Rally, complained the changes would give “legal impunity to NGOs complicit with smugglers”.

She and her party’s leader who sits in the European Parliament, Jordan Bardella, said they would seek to overturn the reform after EU elections in June, which are tipped to boost far-right numbers in the legislature.

The pact’s measures are due to come into force in 2026, after the European Commission first sets out how it would be implemented.

New border centres would hold irregular migrants while their asylum requests are vetted. And deportations of those deemed inadmissible would be sped up.

The pact also requires EU countries to take in thousands of asylum-seekers from “frontline” states such as Italy and Greece, or — if they refuse — to provide money or other resources to the under-pressure nations.

Even ahead of Orban’s broadside, his anti-immigration government reaffirmed Hungary would not be taking in any asylum-seekers.

“This new migration pact practically gives the green light to illegal migration to Europe,” Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said before the vote, adding that Budapest “will not allow illegal migrants to set foot here in Hungary”.

‘EU solidarity’

German’s Scholz said on X that the accord stands for “solidarity among European states” and would “finally relieve the burden on those countries that are particularly hard hit”.

One measure particularly criticised by migrant charities is the sending of asylum-seekers to countries outside the EU deemed “safe”, if the migrant has sufficient ties to that country.

The pact resulted from years of arduous negotiations spurred by a massive inflow of irregular migrants in 2015, many from war-torn Syria and Afghanistan.

Under current EU rules, the arrival country bears responsibility for hosting and vetting asylum-seekers and returning those deemed inadmissible. That has put southern frontline states under pressure and fuelled far-right opposition.

A political breakthrough came in December when a weighted majority of EU countries backed the reforms — overcoming opposition from Hungary and Poland.

In parallel with the reform, the EU has been multiplying the same sort of deal it struck with Turkey in 2016 to stem migratory flows.

It has reached accords with Tunisia and, most recently, Egypt that are portrayed as broader cooperation arrangements. Many lawmakers have, however, criticised the deals.

Url copied to clipboard!