Europe's news in English

COPY LINK

RECESSION

Italy lost 12,000 firms in three months

The number of businesses in Italy fell by 12,000 in the first three months of 2014, according to a report released on Thursday by the business confederation, Confcommercio.

Published: 5 June 2014 11:06 CEST

Italy lost 12,000 firms in three months

It will take Italy 11 years for the businesses in Italy to return to pre-recession levels, according to the Confcommercio report. Shop photo: Shutterstock

Clothing outlets have been particularly affected by the economic downturn, according to the report quoted in La Stampa.

As a result it will take 11 years for businesses in Italy to return to pre-recession levels, Confcommercio said.

But despite the closures, figures released on Thursday by the EU portrayed a more positive story.

Retail trade in Italy grew 0.3 percent in January and 0.2 percent in February, although stagnated in March, the EU’s statistics agency Eurostat said.

Taking a broader look at the Italian economy, Confcommercio predicted an increase in consumption of 0.1 percent and gross domestic product (GDP) to rise by 0.5 percent this year.

A more optimistic outlook on 2015 set GDP growth at 0.9 percent and consumption to increase by 0.7 percent, La Stampa said.

Italy’s GDP shrank by 0.1 percent in the first quarter of this year, a worrying sign for the government as it tries to get the economy moving and attract foreign investors.

Speaking earlier this week, Finance Minister Pier Carlo Padoan said the Italian economy “has to be reinvigorated with all-out structural reforms”. The government’s privatization plan would add 0.7 percentage points to GDP growth annually, Padoan said in Rome on Tuesday.

Don't miss a story about Italy – Join us on Facebook and Twitter.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.

Become a Member to leave a comment.

Was Norway ill prepared for the Covid-19 pandemic?

Photo by Eirik Skarstein on Unsplash

The 450-page report was submitted to Prime Minister Erna Solberg by medical professor Stener Kvinnsland, who led the review.

The commission found that, generally, Norway had handled the pandemic well compared to the rest of Europe. That was in part due to citizens taking infection control measures on board.

“After a year of pandemic, Norway is among the countries in Europe with the lowest mortality and lowest economic impact. The authorities could not have succeeded if the population had not supported the infection control measures;” the report states.

However, the commission’s report also outlined that Norway did not properly prepare itself for the pandemic.

“The authorities knew that a pandemic was the most likely national crisis to have the most negative consequences. Nevertheless, they were not prepared when the extensive and serious Covid-19 pandemic came,” it said.

Prime Minister Erna Solberg said during an interview with the commission, conducted as part of its work, that the government did not have an infection control strategy of its own.

“We had a ‘we have to deal with a difficult situation’ strategy. We had to do everything we could to gain control and get the infection down. It was really only at the end of March (2020) that we found the more long-term strategy,” she told the commission.

Low stocks of personal protective equipment were another source of criticism in the report.

“The government knew that it would in all probability be difficult to obtain infection control equipment in the event of a pandemic. Nevertheless, the warehouses were almost empty,” Kvinnsland said at a press conference.

Norwegian health authorities were praised for the swiftness with which they implemented infection control measures. But the commission said that the decision should have been formally made by the government, rather than the Norwegian Directorate of Health.

READ MORE: Norway saw fewer hospital patients in 2020 despite pandemic

The implementation of restrictions in March 2020 was critiqued for failing to ensure that “infection control measures were in line with the constitution and human rights.”

One-fifth of municipalities in Norway lacked a functioning plan in the event of a pandemic according to the report, and the government did not provide enough support to municipalities.

“We believe that government paid too little attention to the municipalities. The municipalities were given much larger tasks than they could have prepared for,” Kvinnsland said.

The report was also critical of Norway’s lack of a plan for dealing with imported infections in autumn 2020.

“The government lacked a plan to deal with imported infections when there was a new wave of infections in Europe in the autumn of 2020,” the report found.

“When the government eased infection control measures towards the summer of 2020, they made many assessments individually. The government did not consider the sum of the reliefs and it had no plan to deal with increasing cross-border infection,” it added.

The report also concluded that Norway allowed itself to be too easily lobbied by business when deciding to ease border restrictions last summer.

The division of roles in handling aspects of the pandemic was scrutinised in the report. Here, the division of responsibilities between the Ministry of Health and Care Services, The Norwegian Directorate of Health and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health were unclear.

The prime minister has asked the commission to continue its work.

“We are not done with the pandemic yet. Therefore, it is natural that the commission submits a final report. There will also be topics where the learning points can only be drawn later,” Solberg said.

Url copied to clipboard!