SHARE
COPY LINK

REFERENDUM

Shetland cites Norway heritage in vote push

Campaigners from Orkney, Shetland, and the Western Isles are pushing for a referendum that could grant them independence from Scotland on the grounds that they were all historically part of Norway.

Shetland cites Norway heritage in vote push
A view of Shetland. Photo: Pete&Lynne/Flickr
The group, Our Islands Our Future, lodged a petition with the Scottish Parliament on 29 April, and have collected some 1,177 in support of their proposal. 
 
"Whether you live in Shetland, Orkney or the Western Isles, you will know that your part of the world was once in Norway and still has its own traditions and culture which set it apart from the rest of what is now Scotland," Malcolm Lamont, from Lerwick in the Shetland Islands wrote introducing the petition. 
 
The campaigners want a separate referendum for their islands on  18 September 2014, when Scotland is itself voting on whether to continue as part of the United Kingdom. 
 
"A referendum will soon be held on whether Scotland should be an independent country. What better time to decide the status of each of these island groups?" Lamont wrote in the petition. 
"Many believe there is a case for independence – for Shetland, for Orkney, and sometimes the idea is also heard in the Western Isles. Others believe there is a case for remaining part of the UK even if Scotland leaves." 
 
Orkney and Shetland were both controlled by Norway from the 9th century until they was transferred to the Scottish King James III in 1468 and 1472 respectively. 
 
The Western Isles were transferred to the Kingdom of Scotland in 1266 as part of the Treaty of Perth with Norway. 
 
Catriona Murray, the secretary of Our Islands Our Future, said that the group did not see a return to Norwegian rule as an option. 
 
"We discussed that we should have an option where we ask people if they want to become part of Norway," she told NRK. "But we chose to walk away from it, since very few on the islands support this."
 
However, she said a vote on joining Norway could come once the islands vote for independence. 
 
"If the Scottish government lets us get a vote, and there is increased support for Norwegian membership after that, I think people will get to vote on it," she said. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

REFERENDUM

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum

Switzerland's decision to purchase US-made fighter jets could be put to a referendum,

Swiss decision to purchase US fighter jets could force second referendum
Swiss fighter jets. Photo: JOE KLAMAR / AFP

Switzerland’s government on Wednesday backed the purchase of 36 F-35A fighter jets from Lockheed Martin to replace its fleet and five Patriot air defence units from fellow US manufacturer Raytheon.

Switzerland’s current air defence equipment will reach the end of its service life in 2030 and has been undergoing a long and hotly-contested search for replacements.

“The Federal Council is confident that these two systems are the most suitable for protecting the Swiss population from air threats in the future,” the government said in a statement.

‘No Trump fighter jets’: Swiss don’t want to buy American planes

The decision will now be put to the Swiss parliament — and also risks being challenged at the ballot box, with left-wingers and an anti-militarist group looking to garner enough signatures to trigger a public vote.

The F-35A was chosen ahead of the Airbus Eurofighter; the F/A-18 Super Hornet by Boeing; and French firm Dassault’s Rafale.

For the ground-based air defence (GBAD) system, Patriot was selected ahead of SAMP/T by France’s Eurosam.

“An evaluation has revealed that these two systems offer the highest overall benefit at the lowest overall cost,” the government statement said. Switzerland is famously neutral. However, its long-standing position is one of armed neutrality and the landlocked European country has mandatory conscription for men.

“A fleet of 36 aircraft would be large enough to cover Switzerland’s airspace protection needs over the longer term in a prolonged situation of heightened tensions,” the government said.

“The air force must be able to ensure that Swiss airspace cannot be used by foreign parties in a military conflict.” 

Long path to decision 

Switzerland began to seek replacements for its ageing fleet of fighter jets more than a decade ago, but the issue has become caught up in a political battle in the wealthy Alpine nation.

The Swiss government has long argued for the need to quickly replace its 30 or so F/A-18 Hornets, which will reach the end of their lifespan in 2030, and the F-5 Tigers, which have been in service for four decades and are not equipped for night flights.

In 2014, the country looked set to purchase 22 Gripen E fighter jets from Swedish group Saab, only to see the public vote against releasing the funds needed to go forward with the multi-billion-dollar deal.

Bern launched a new selection process four years later, and a referendum last year to release six billion Swiss francs ($6.5 billion) for the purchase of the fighters of the government’s choice squeezed through with 50.1 percent of voters in favour.

During the referendum campaign, the government warned that without a swift replacement for its fleet, “Switzerland will no longer be in a position to protect and even less defend its airspace by 2030”.

Currently, the fleet does not have the capacity to support ground troops for reconnaissance missions or to intervene against ground targets.

Meanwhile Switzerland’s current GBAD system is also old and lacks the capacity to meet the widening spectrum of modern threats.

The military currently relies on a range of Rapier and Stinger short-range missiles that have been in service since 1963.

SHOW COMMENTS