SHARE
COPY LINK
JOBTALK GERMANY

STUDY

PhD studies in Germany: What you need to know

In this week's JobTalk, The Local gives the lowdown on PhD studies in Germany. What are the best types of courses and should you choose Germany?

PhD studies in Germany: What you need to know
The number of foreign PhD candidates studying in Germany has doubled since 1997. But what do you need to know before choosing postgraduate study here? Photo: DPA

Why Germany?

German higher education authorities have hailed a growth in the number of postgraduates coming from abroad to study in the country in recent years. The number of foreign researchers in German institutions reached a new high in 2011.

But with German universities becoming less competitive overall in global rankings, one might question why so many choose to come here for further study.

The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), an education ministry programme which provides support and information to foreign graduates, argues the main reasons to come here for a doctorate or masters degree are the low fees, excellent research environment, and the high standard of living.

Officials also make much of the German system's openness to foreign students.

Education ministry initiatives such as “Research in Germany: Land of Ideas” have tried to welcome more foreign postgraduates and authorities are keen to make Germany ever more attractive to academics from abroad.

“People who come here to study and feel welcomed will then want to come back later on as researchers,” DAAD President Margret Wintermantel said in a statement last week.

But prospective PhD candidates should be aware of how German doctorates work before packing their bags and heading abroad.

Individual or Structural?

The first hurdle to pass in starting a PhD in Germany is choosing either an individual or a structured doctorate programme.

An “individual” programme is the traditional form of a PhD in Germany and sees the student producing their thesis under the supervision of one professor.

It offers a lot of flexibility with a study period spread over three to five years, but it needs a lot of organization and initiative from students to get the work done.

“Structured” programmes, meanwhile, are modeled on PhDs at many universities in English-speaking countries, where doctoral students are put into groups, each with a team of academics to supervise them, often called the “thesis committee”.

Unlike the individual doctorate, structured programmes have set timetables, compulsory lectures and seminars and credit point assessments to fulfill, similar to undergraduate degrees.

Structured programmes at graduate schools are slowly becoming more the norm, according to the DAAD, with over 700 such doctorates on offer, many of them funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Many of these structural programmes offer teaching in English, and most candidates finish their doctorate within three or four years.

Show me the money

Finance is a key selling point for post-grad study in Germany.

Unlike in the UK where students pay thousands a year in tuition fees and have a harder time netting government funds after their first degree, PhDs (like undergraduate degrees) are essentially free in Germany – at least for the most part.

Students have to pay a “semester contribution” when they re-enroll every six months, but this is only about €150 to €200. Nobody pays full tuition until after their first six semesters (three years).

Of course, students still need money for living costs, but a variety of organizations and programmes, including the DAAD, offer funding to outstanding international students. The DAAD said it funded 2,580 international doctoral students in 2008.

Generally these scholarship deals require excellent results in your first degree and sometimes extra qualifications like work experience, specific research goals, or even special political or social affiliations. Many have made details available on online funding databases.

Alternatively, PhD students are often hired as paid research associates by their university or by independent research centres and many choose to take on part time work, although this can conflict with working restrictions placed on students from outside the EU.

Useful websites

 
 
Alex Evans and Frances Foley
 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

RESEARCH

ANALYSIS: Why are Denmark’s politicians criticising university researchers?

The Danish parliament has recently adopted a controversial text asking universities to ensure that "politics is not disguised as science". The Local's contributor Sophie Standen examines why Denmark's politicians are criticising university researchers.

ANALYSIS: Why are Denmark's politicians criticising university researchers?
Populist politicians have singled out courses at Copenhagen Business School (CBS) for following a so-called 'woke' agenda. Photo: Bjarke MacCarthy/CBS

What has happened? 

On the 1st of June, a majority in the Danish parliament adopted a written declaration that aimed to combat ‘excessive activism in certain humanities and social science research environments’.

The initial debate was led by Morten Messerschmidt from the Danish People’s Party (DF) and Henrik Dahl from Liberal Alliance (LA). The declaration was then voted through, with all of the major parties in favour, including the governing Social Democratic party.

What does the controversial declaration say? 

The declaration stated that the Danish parliament expects that university managements will ensure the self-regulation of scientific research, so that ‘politics is not disguised as science’.

However, it also asserted that Danish parliament has no right to determine the method or topic of research in Danish universities, and stressed the importance of free and critical debate in the research community.

Who is upset by it? 

The adoption of this position by Danish parliament has proven extremely controversial for many academics and researchers, with over 3,200 Danish and international researchers signing an open letter denouncing the stance adopted by the Danish government.

The authors of the letter stated that ‘academic freedom is under increasing attack’, and described the developments as ‘highly troubling’.

Furthermore, in another open letter to the Minister for Higher Education and Science, Ane Halsboe-Jørgensen, published in the Politiken newspaper, 262 Danish university researchers complained that they were facing increasing occurrences of personal intimidation and harassment due their research.

What is concerning university researchers and professors? 

Professor Lisa Ann Richey, a professor at Copenhagen Business School, told The Local that the parliament’s move was “illiberal” as “it doesn’t support freedom”. 

Richey, who has been a professor in Denmark for more than 20 years, was one of co-organisers of the open letter, and a co-signatory of the letter published in Politiken.

“I am one of the international recruits who finds the Danish research environment a great place to work,” she said. “We have a strong university system and good research environments. One of the things we are risking here is that reputation, and also the possibility of recruiting internationally.”

She said that in her opinion, academia in Denmark was self-policing due to the exhaustive peer-review process and oversight by university authorities. 

“There are lots of checks and balances within academia, and sometimes it doesn’t seem like that because they [the politicians] have no idea how many evaluations we go through,” she said. “We have peer reviews, student reviews, and university assessments to ensure quality in research.” 

Is there a populist campaign behind the statement? 

Richey complained that long before the parliamentary statement, prominent populist politicians “came out on social media calling out particular courses”. 

“They did this to a course I taught in, saying now even CBS has become part of this ‘woke agenda’,” she complained. “This statement about politics dressed up as science, it’s meant to intimidate. We need university leadership to support us and we need everyone to recognise that this is a threat towards academic freedom and also to make sure that we don’t expose individuals”

Anders Bjarklev, the rector of the Danish Technical University (DTU), and president of the rector’s college for Danish universities, echoed this sentiment. Writing on social media, he has called the position adopted by parliament, ‘an attack on research freedom’. 

“When subjects are singled out by politicians, such as gender studies or post-colonial studies, then academics get worried because much of our funding is from the government,” he told The Local. 

“I am also worried that academics will be scared to take part or publish research in these subjects”.  As rector of DTU, he says he is “not sure what we could do differently”, as academics at the university “always want to ensure the highest quality standard of research”.

What has the government said to defend itself? 

In an interview with the Politiken newspaper, Bjørn Brandenborg, the Social Democrat’s spokesperson for higher education and science, insisted that despite the statement, there was “no general distrust of universities” on the part of the government. 

“The Danish parliament has a right, like all other citizens, to have an opinion on research results”, he continued, while stressing that “the Danish parliament will not become involved in decisions over what is researched in Danish universities”.

In his view, he said, the text voted on by the parliament was “completely unproblematic”, as  “all it says is that universities should take responsibility for the quality of their research”.

This adopted stance by the Danish government has shaken the arms-length principle of trust between Danish research institutions and the Danish government. Many have denounced the politicians who have singled out specific researchers on social media as examples of political activism within research in Denmark.

In a statement to Politiken, the minister responsible for Higher Education and Science in Denmark, Ane Halsboe-Jørgenson, remarked that the 3,241 researchers that had signed the open letter had “reached the wrong conclusion” about the adopted declaration.

She insisted that the Danish government is “fighting for research freedom”, while also remarking that she thinks “we politicians must stay far away from judging individuals and individual research areas”.

What will happen next? 

For Professor Lisa Ann Richey, “now, when major political parties are part of this, making a ‘non-problem’ a problem, then it’s really time that we [academics] have to respond.”

“Our work is important and it is not acceptable behaviour to try and bully individual researchers and to police research environments,” she continued. “This is something that will be moving forward now that universities have spoken out officially”. 

SHOW COMMENTS