SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

EU cuts could pull plug on Human Brain Project

The Human Brain Project, a mammoth research project directed by the Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), is in danger of dying because of last month’s vote by Swiss citizens to curb immigration in Switzerland.

EU cuts could pull plug on Human Brain Project
Geneva's Campus Biotech, former home to Merck Serono, is set to host the threatened Human Brain Poject this year. Photo: Merck

That is the assessment of the project’s South African expat director Henry Markram, who says funding for the project may be pulled by the European Union, its main backer.

The EU has called into question all bilateral agreements with Switzerland after the February 9th referendum.

Citizens voted against the freedom of movement of labour accord between Switzerland and the EU.

“It may well be that the research (funding) policy will be a victim,” brain researcher Markram is quoted as telling the German-language weekly Schweiz am Sonntag.

“By 2016, the European Commission will have invested only 54 million euros of the announced half a billion ($688 million) in our project,” he said.

The project, a sophisticated brain simulation exercise, involves 500 researchers from 22 countries, who aim to gain new insights into brain diseases such as Alzheimer’s, as well as in computing.

While other countries are involved, the project, announced last year to much fanfare, is Swiss-based.

“We have founded, developed and co-financed the project at EPFL,” Markram said.

“The infrastructure here is unique — without Switzerland the Human Brain Project dies,” he told Schweiz am Sonntag.

It is one of the “biggest scientific projects of all time”, promising advances for Switzerland’s neurological research and its pharmaceutical industry, while aiding in the development of new computer systems.

The billion-euro-plus project was to move into Geneva’s Campus Biotech this year.

Swiss universities have already raised the alarm about the threat of losing hundreds of millions of euros in research agreements from Brussels.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

EUROPEAN UNION

Why does Switzerland have to comply with European court rulings?

Europe's top rights court ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, condemning it to a hefty fee. But why does Switzerland have to abide by this decision?

Why does Switzerland have to comply with European court rulings?

In a landmark ruling handed down on April 9th, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg sided with a group of Swiss pensioners who ‘sued’ the country for not doing enough to mitigate the effects of global warming. 

The ECHR ruled that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the “right to respect for private and family life,” and ordered the government to pay the complainants a fine of €80,000 (78,555 francs). 

READ ALSO: Who are Switzerland’s victorious climate ‘Elders’? 

While environmental groups and a number of political parties welcomed the verdict, questions also arose about why Switzerland, which is not a member of the EU, must comply with the decision handed down by the Council of Europe’s court.

This fact was not lost on the populist, anti-EU Swiss People’s Party (SVP).

One of its MPs, Jean-Luc Addor, questioned not only the court’s judgment, but also the fact that foreign judges have ‘meddled’ in Swiss matters.

“What is the legitimacy of the ECHR to pronounce such a ‘condemnation’?,” he asked.” Is it now going to send the European army to Switzerland?”

So why is Switzerland obligated to conform to the ECHR’s judgment? 

In 1974, the country, though neutral, signed the European Convention on Human Rights.

As the European court was established expressly to monitor the parties’ compliance with the provisions enshrined in the Convention, Switzerland must heed its judgements. (The ECHR hears only matters related to human rights. It does not handle any criminal cases).

To ensure that rulings are just and impartial, the ECHR’s judges come from the 46 countries that ratified the Convention.

Switzerland is represented by Andreas Zünd, who has served on the ECHR since January 2021.

How do Swiss cases end up in front of ECHR judges?

Switzerland has different court levels: district, cantonal, and federal.

Complainants first file their cases in the district court. If they are not happy with the verdict, they can appeal it within 30 days, at which point the case will go to the higher judicial level, that is, the cantonal court.

The next step up the judicial ladder is the Federal Supreme court, the highest judicial authority in Switzerland.

Headquartered in Lausanne, it is the final instance on all appeals against decisions of the cantonal courts.

But though this final judgment can’t be appealed in Switzerland, the case  — if it relates to rights outlined in the Convention — can be taken to the ECHR.

READ ALSO: What you should know about Switzerland’s courts 

What ‘Swiss cases’ have been judged by the European court?

The climate activists’ case is the latest of dozens of rulings involving complaints from Switzerland. 

Some of the other successful ones involved a widower whose pension benefits were denied by a Swiss court; a Romanian woman fined for beginning in Geneva; and a Sudanese man who won his appeal against deportation from Switzerland

You can see all the ECHR rulings for Switzerland (in German or French) for the last 45 years here.

SHOW COMMENTS