SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Italian MEP protests at EU-Swiss debate

An outspoken far-right Italian MEP interrupted a session of the European Parliament on Wednesday to defend the Swiss anti-immigration vote of February 9th.

Italian MEP protests at EU-Swiss debate
Strasbourg was debating the EU's position on Switzerland in light of the recent referendum. Photo: Cedric Puisney

Strasbourg was debating the EU's position on Switzerland in light of the recent referendum when Italian deputy Mario Borghezio made his protest.

Brandishing a Swiss flag, Borghezio, who is a member of the populist, anti-immigration Northern League, interrupted the debate by shouting: "Yes to the referendum! Yes to the people's freedom!

"Enough of European dictatorship over the people!" he added in Italian and French, before being sternly asked to leave the chamber.

Swiss newspaper 20 Minuten said Borghezio's actions were provoked by a previous speech by infamous German politician Daniel Cohn-Bendit – known as Dany le Rouge from his time as a leader of the Paris student uprisings of 1968 – who is reported to have said "The Swiss want to have their cake and eat it too."

Following the Italian MEP's outburst, a war of words broke out between Cohn-Bendit, the parliamentary leader of the Green party, and Bruno Gollnisch, a member of France's far-right National Front.

"You're complete cretins because you haven't understood Europe's values," Cohn-Bendit told his right-wing rival.

"I'm full of admiration for his intelligence and full of humility for my own cretinism," Gollnisch shot back sarcastically.

Cohn-Bendit later predicted the Swiss would "come back on their knees because they need Europe", saying 60 percent of Switzerland's exports go to the European Union.

"It's up to Switzerland to find solutions, it's up to Switzerland to set its watches to the right time," he said.

The incident reflects the split reaction in Europe to the Swiss vote. While most MEPs have criticized Switzerland's decision to limit immigration from the EU, some right-wing politicians have supported the country.

During Wednesday's session Belgian MEP Philip Claeys said the EU's criticism of the Swiss referendum showed its authoritarian nature, reported the BBC. "The vote had nothing to do with xenophobia, it is a return to common sense," he said.

Others emphasized that the free movement of people is a fundamental pillar of the EU and the introduction of quotas for foreigners in Switzerland is not acceptable.

Switzerland has also blocked free access to employment for people from Croatia, the EU's newest member state.

In retaliation, the EU has suspended talks with Switzerland over its participation in EU research and education programmes, reports the BBC.

Greek deputy foreign minister Dimitris Kouroulas said the EU should "stand by our own principles and not give way to a pick and choose approach to European integration."

Cohn-Bendit stressed the need for Switzerland to find its own solution to the situation, rather than looking to the EU.

"The Swiss are perfectly entitled to vote as they wish, but they are perfectly entitled to take responsibility for the consequences of that vote," he said.

"The Swiss will come back to us on their knees when they need us," he added.

It's not the first time Italian MEP Borghezio has caused unrest, reports 20 Minuten. Last June he was accused of insulting an Italian colleague of Congolese origin, while he has previously expressed sympathy for Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian extremist responsible for the murder of 80 people in 2011.

SEE ALSO: Italian MEP snipes at Italy's first black minister

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

EUROPEAN UNION

Why any deal between Switzerland and EU lies in the hands of the Swiss

The newly resumed round of negotiations between Switzerland and the European Union is now underway. But even if agreements are signed, stamped, and sealed, this doesn’t automatically mean they will go into effect.

Why any deal between Switzerland and EU lies in the hands of the Swiss

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen and Swiss President Viola Amherd launched negotiations in Brussels on Monday on “a broad package of measures to deepen and expand the EU-Switzerland relationship”, the European Commission said in a statement. (Read more about what’s at stake, below).

“Today is the beginning of a new chapter in our relationship with Switzerland based on a renewed trust and engagement between partners and neighbours,” she added.

This is a positive development after Switzerland suddenly walked away from more than a decade of negotiations in May 2021 due to the EU’s refusal to budge on Swiss demands to exclude key issues relating to state aid, wage protections and freedom of movement. 

The move angered Brussels and strained the relationship between the two sides.

But after nearly three years of tiptoeing around each other, the two parties finally got back to business on Monday.

What does Bern hope to accomplish during the talks?

In a nutshell, these are some of the issues Switzerland will bring to the negotiating table:

Immigration

The majority (1.4 million)of foreign nationals living in — and still coming to — Switzerland are from EU states, so immigration is a hot-button topic.
Wage protection
“The objective of ensuring wage and working conditions by maintaining the current level of protection sustainably will be reaffirmed,” the government pointed out.

Electricity

Swiss government therefore wants to negotiate an agreement with the EU, in order to allow full access for Switzerland to the single market for electricity and “ensure cooperation in this sector with the EU in the future”.

Transport

In parallel with the opening  of international rail passenger transport, the Federal Council will seek to maintain Switzerland’s prerogative to allocate slots on its own territory.

“The controlled opening up of international rail transport must not affect the quality of public transport in Switzerland,” the government said. 

Swiss sovereignty

The government wants to ensure that Switzerland will always be able to decide autonomously whether or not it wishes to adopt European law.
Its direct-democracy system of referendums must also remain intact.
In the event of a dispute, Switzerland and the EU will be equally represented in an arbitration tribunal, which will have to decide.

READ ALSO: What is Switzerland’s deal with the EU?

If both sides agree on these, and other points that are being negtioted, when will new treaties come into effect?

It may take a while, but a better question to ask is: will these agreements be enforced at all?

That’s because when it comes to implementing new laws — regardless of whether they were hatched in Bern or in Brussels — the people will have the last, decisive, word.

Chalk it down to Switzerland’s famous, unique brand of grassroots (or direct) democracy.

Under this system, any new legislation to which any group of Swiss citizens opposes, will come to a referendum.

To do that on a federal level, opponents must collect 50,000 valid signatures within 100 days of the publication of the new legislation. The law will only come into force if it is accepted by a majority of the voters. (Only Swiss citizens over 18 can sign the petitions and vote in national referendums).

READ ALSO: How Switzerland’s direct democracy system works

Do Swiss citizens always vote against closer ties with the EU?

No.

In May 2000, for instance, 67.2 percent voted in favour of the first package of bilateral agreements with the European Union.

And in 2005, 56 percent of voters approved the extension of the agreement on the free movement of persons.

However, in terms of actually joining the EU, the voters have been overwhelmingly against this move.

In 1997 and 2001, more than 74 percent had rejected popular initiatives seeking EU membership.

What about the latest round of negotiations?

It is too early to say, but the opposition to any further links with Brussels is gaining momentum, especially among the right wing — historically a driving force against the EU.

The populist Swiss People’s Party (SVP) is speaking against “the EU submission treaty,” while its sister group, Pro Schweiz, has collected enough signatures to launch a vote on reinforcing Switzerland’s neutrality and, by extension, rejecting anything that smacks of cooperation with the European Union.

It is therefore certain that either or both groups will launch a referendum to stop the government from implementing any more pro-European policies.

This doesn’t mean however, that the Swiss, who are mostly a pragmatic lot, would reject the new agreements at the ballot box — since the majority had already accepted the treaties mentioned above.

Either way, Blick newspaper reported that “it is the Swiss people who will decide whether  the bilateral agreements between Switzerland and the European Union will be finalised.” 

SHOW COMMENTS