SHARE
COPY LINK

POLITICS

Lööf says no to Löfven, socialism, and arrogance

Friday's Social Democrat pre-election flirt with the Liberals was less ideologically queer than an invite to the libertarian and "union-busting" Centre Party, observers told The Local on Friday.

Lööf says no to Löfven, socialism, and arrogance
Social Democrat leader Stefan Löfven and Centre Party leader Annie Lööf. Files: TT

The right-of-centre government coalition has been far from alone in awaiting Social Democrat input on how exactly the opposition intends to govern Sweden next year if elections results end up in their favour. The answer finally came in the shape of an op-ed in Friday’s Dagens Nyheter newspaper, in which party leader Stefan Löfven said he would rule the land with almost anyone, apart from the Sweden Democrats, and reached out a particularly welcoming hand to the Centre Party and the Liberals (Folkpartiet).

Reactions varied. Liberal leader Jan Björklund called it “embarrassing”, which was to be expected, political science senior lecturer Nick Aylott at Södertörn University College told The Local.

“He has to say that. The four coalition parties have committed themselves so strongly to this alliance that they would look untrustworthy if they suddenly ditched it before the elections,” Aylott said. “They would look shifty and unreliable and opportunistic, which would be highly unlikely to bring them any electoral reward.”

What is known is that the four-party conservative coalition has begun slipping in the opinion polls, after riding high on the Social Democrat’s period of extreme turbulence between the 2010 election and the appointment in 2012 of metal union heavyweight Löfven to the party chair.

The last opinion poll by state agency Statistics Sweden was published in June this year, looking back at the spring.

“If a parliamentary election were to be held in May (2013) then the government parties would receive 40.7 percent of the votes. The Social Democrats, the Left Party and the Green Party would together receive 50.5 percent,” the statisticians summarized.

Whatever happens, the Social Democrats cannot count on a majority of the votes, forcing them to cooperate, although the cross-bloc flirt repulsed some on Friday. While many observers said the Social Democrats at least had socially liberal attitudes in common with the Liberals, the outstretched hand to the Centre Party was quickly slapped away.

Centre Party leader Annie Lööf quickly tweeted. “There are three things I really don’t like: 1) socialism 2) arrogance 3) men who don’t understand a no. I say no to the Social Democrats.”

Leftwing political commentator Eric Rosén said that while the Centre Party and the Social Democrats had made relatively easy bedfellows for a time in the 1990s, the subsequent leader Maud Olofsson had “aggressively” distanced herself from then socialist head honcho Göran Persson. If she turned the party away from their workers party buddies, Annie Lööf has hardcore hit the gas pedal, he said.

“I think the Social Democrats hope they can work with the Centre Party, but I think it’s a miscalculation,” Rosén told The Local. “The Centre Party is fuelled by hatred of the trade unions (facket), they deride it with slogans like ‘Fuck Facket Forever’.”

Rosén further said that the Centre Party’s stated support of labour migration was viewed by many in leftwing quarters as a way to pry power out of the hands of the Swedish trade unions, in effect setting sail to structural wage dumping. The Liberals were not free of criticism in that area either, however.

“The Liberals have worrying attitudes to work security laws and lowered starting wages,” Rosén told The Local.

At Södertörn Unviersity College south of Stockholm, meanwhile, Nick Aylott said Löfven’s invite made perfect sense given the party’s disastrous 2010 alliance with the Left Party, which “still scares” a lot of Sweden’s middle-class voters.

“Löfven doesn’t have much choice – there is no enthusiasm for repeating (former leader Mona) Sahlin’s failed strategy,” Aylott told The Local.

But what do Löfven’s party colleagues think of Friday’s op-ed?

“The Social Democrats is still a very divided party. For example on the question of private companies making profits on outsourced public services, the party is extremely divided.”

The minority Left Party has long been an outspoken critic of profit-making in state-funded welfare, but this still did not make them a strategic ally to the Social Democrats, Aylott argued, as far too many Swedish voters see them as far too left.

The real treat in store for politics buffs, Aylott underlined, was the wrangling set to take place after the September 2014 elections. While Rosén, who is editor-in-chief of leftwing opinion site Politism.se, said Löfven was unlikely to give minister posts to anyone except their main allies the Greens, Aylott said predictions were null and void until the dice are cast.

“It will be a totally different game once the elections are out of the way,” he told The Local.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

‘Very little debate’ on consequences of Sweden’s crime and migration clampdown

Sweden’s political leaders are putting the population’s well-being at risk by moving the country in a more authoritarian direction, according to a recent report.

'Very little debate' on consequences of Sweden's crime and migration clampdown

The Liberties Rule of Law report shows Sweden backsliding across more areas than any other of the 19 European Union member states monitored, fuelling concerns that the country risks breaching its international human rights obligations, the report says.

“We’ve seen this regression in other countries for a number of years, such as Poland and Hungary, but now we see it also in countries like Sweden,” says John Stauffer, legal director of the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, which co-authored the Swedish section of the report.

The report, compiled by independent civil liberties groups, examines six common challenges facing European Union member states.

Sweden is shown to be regressing in five of these areas: the justice system, media environment, checks and balances, enabling framework for civil society and systemic human rights issues.

The only area where Sweden has not regressed since 2022 is in its anti-corruption framework, where there has been no movement in either a positive or negative direction.

Source: Liberties Rule of Law report

As politicians scramble to combat an escalation in gang crime, laws are being rushed through with too little consideration for basic rights, according to Civil Rights Defenders.

Stauffer cites Sweden’s new stop-and-search zones as a case in point. From April 25th, police in Sweden can temporarily declare any area a “security zone” if there is deemed to be a risk of shootings or explosive attacks stemming from gang conflicts.

Once an area has received this designation, police will be able to search people and cars in the area without any concrete suspicion.

“This is definitely a piece of legislation where we see that it’s problematic from a human rights perspective,” says Stauffer, adding that it “will result in ethnic profiling and discrimination”.

Civil Rights Defenders sought to prevent the new law and will try to challenge it in the courts once it comes into force, Stauffer tells The Local in an interview for the Sweden in Focus Extra podcast

He also notes that victims of racial discrimination at the hands of the Swedish authorities had very little chance of getting a fair hearing as actions by the police or judiciary are “not even covered by the Discrimination Act”.

READ ALSO: ‘Civil rights groups in Sweden can fight this government’s repressive proposals’

Stauffer also expresses concerns that an ongoing migration clampdown risks splitting Sweden into a sort of A and B team, where “the government limits access to rights based on your legal basis for being in the country”.

The report says the government’s migration policies take a “divisive ‘us vs them’ approach, which threatens to increase rather than reduce existing social inequalities and exclude certain groups from becoming part of society”.

Proposals such as the introduction of a requirement for civil servants to report undocumented migrants to the authorities would increase societal mistrust and ultimately weaken the rule of law in Sweden, the report says.

The lack of opposition to the kind of surveillance measures that might previously have sparked an outcry is a major concern, says Stauffer.

Politicians’ consistent depiction of Sweden as a country in crisis “affects the public and creates support for these harsh measures”, says Stauffer. “And there is very little talk and debate about the negative consequences.”

Hear John Stauffer from Civil Rights Defender discuss the Liberties Rule of Law report in the The Local’s Sweden in Focus Extra podcast for Membership+ subscribers.

SHOW COMMENTS