SHARE
COPY LINK

MINING

‘Klondike laws’ spur Swedish fury at miners

Lax prospecting laws and among the world's lowest mining taxes has 'unserious companies' frothing at the mouth over Sweden's untapped mineral and metal resources, angering residents across the north, explains author Po Tidholm.

'Klondike laws' spur Swedish fury at miners

“Hydroelectric dams, forests, and ore built this country,” Tidholm tells The Local. “But when Sweden was modernizing in the 1900s, the northern communities got a lot back from local industries, because at the time they were labour intensive.”

The Local reported earlier this week how police in Jokkmokk had to dig up protesters at a proposed new iron mine in Kallak, which has the local community, including the indigenous Sami, up in arms. A company called Beowulf, listed in London and Stockholm, has its sights set on a new mine.

“Kallak is traditional reindeer grazing land for the Sami, who for many and historic reasons don’t own their land,” Tidholm explains. “But even if they did, it wouldn’t make any difference.”

Sweden is known internationally for its welcoming laws on prospecting. If there are minerals in the ground, any company, Swedish or other, has the right to take samples – the landowner can do nothing about it.

Yet this law in conjunction with highly-mechanized mining and Sweden having the second lowest mineral tax in the world, has turned Sweden’s north into Klondike, Tidholm says, attracting gold diggers as there are quick profits to be made.

“There are companies being investigated for financial crimes and shady dealings worldwide ready to extract Norrland’s resources, he says. “It is utterly absurd. People are really angry.”

While there are concerns about the business practices of some of the companies heading north, another problem is that they offer little income to local communities.

“While the dams have been built and are now run remotely from Stockholm, and machines fell trees, the mining companies are registered outside the municipality in question, and workers are flown in,” Tidholm says. “These mines are virtually like oil platforms. The communities get no money from income tax.”

Tidholm says the municipalities have been slow to accept that the industries that once formed their backbone can no longer hold them upright financially.

“The penny is starting to drop, slowly,” he says. “I’ve spent years crunching numbers. There is no money to be had from these industries any longer.”

READ ALSO: “For some unfathomable reason, Jokkmokk municipality is sacrificing its population’s well-being to make some rich person even richer.”

Tidholm also says a mineral tax of 0.05 percent – compared to about five percent in the US, and between six to 14 percent across Canada – means the national coffers aren’t replenished either.

“In 2011, Sweden got 400,000 kronor from the minerals extracted here. It’s enough change for a coffee!” Tidholm says. “It is truly absurd that Sweden doesn’t charge the mining companies.”

Po Tidholm is the author of Norrland – Essäer och reportage (Teg Publishing 2011).

Ann Törnkvist

Follow Ann on Twitter here

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

MINING

Spain’s vast supplies of untapped rare minerals pit environmentalists against high-tech

Spain's untapped rare earths (the second biggest supply in Europe) are stoking tensions between mining companies and environmentalists over fears of the devastating impact of extracting minerals considered essential for a high-tech and low-carbon economy.

Spain's vast supplies of untapped rare minerals pit environmentalists against high-tech
Rare earths are essential in a range of high-tech products key to combatting climate change. Photo: Christophe ARCHAMBAULT/AFP

The group of 17 minerals are — despite their name — widely distributed across the globe, but exist in such thin concentrations that extracting even small quantities requires the processing of enormous quantities of ore.

Still, they are key ingredients in a range of high-tech and cutting-edge products, from wind turbines and electric vehicles to smart phones, medical devices and missile-guidance systems.

With China having a stranglehold on global supply and demand surging to meet the transition to a low-carbon economy, the political pressure – and financial incentive – to put strategic interests ahead of the environment is growing.

“Spain has the largest amount of rare earths in Europe after Finland. There is real potential,” said Vicente Gutiérrez Peinador, president of the National Confederation of Mining and Metallurgy Companies (Confedem).

Ninety-eight percent of the rare earths used in the EU are imported from China, prompting Brussels to recently urge member states to develop their own extraction capacities.

Spain’s reserves are estimated at 70,000 tonnes, according to the Geological and Mining Institute of Spain.

“On a global level this is not much, but on a European scale it is significant,” said Roberto Martínez, head of mineral resources at the institute.

‘Opportunity for Spain’

And it is enough to arouse the interest of investors as demand for the minerals continues to surge.

“It is an opportunity for Spain,” said Confedem’s Peinador, but also “for Europe”.

“Two sites in particular are considered interesting: one in Monte Galineiro, in Galicia,” and the other in the province of Ciudad Real, in the Castilla y Leon region, said Martinez.

Only the 240-hectare (590-acre) Matamulas site in Ciudad Real has so far been the subject of an application to mine.

The site is rich in monazite — an ore containing rare earth minerals including thorium, lanthanum and cerium.

A cyclist wears a protective face mask while riding along a dusty roadv where dozens of factories processing rare earths
China has a stranglehold on global supply of rare earths — along with the environmental devastation their extraction creates Photo: FREDERIC J. BROWN / AFP

However, the project has been blocked: the region refused the mining permit filed by Madrid-based Quantum Mineria in 2019 due to concerns about its environmental impact.

“This deposit is located in an area of great environmental value”, between two protected areas, said Elena Solis, coordinator for mining issues of the NGO Ecologists in Action.

It would involve “moving an astronomical amount of earth, which would put the whole area at risk”, said Solis, who also pointed to the “enormous amount of water” needed for this operation and the risk of pollution by toxic or even radioactive dust.

Holes filled in

These arguments were rejected by the company, which lodged a legal appeal.

The refusal of the permit “is incomprehensible” because “we are in a territory considered suitable for mining” by the administration, said Enrique Burkhalter, project director of Quantum Mineria, who denounced “unfounded fears” around the proposal.

According to the company, the extraction would take place on the surface, using a technique that limits the risk of toxic dust: the earth would be transported by truck to a factory, then sieved and finally returned to the site, once the minerals have been removed.

“It is not an open pit… The holes would be quickly filled in so that the crops could be cultivated again,” said Burkhalter.

These arguments are in turn rejected by Ecologists in Action, which believes that the land concerned will be permanently affected.

What will the courts say?

Beyond their differences, industrialists and environmentalists agree on the importance of the court’s decision, which could make or break the extraction projects.

The ruling, expected in several months’ time, will be “important” but “will not put an end to the debate”, said Martinez, who pointed to a paradox inherent in mining: “On paper, everyone wants to reduce external dependence, but as soon as we talk about concrete projects, it’s a different matter.”

SHOW COMMENTS