SHARE
COPY LINK

M

Tour de France stage 15: Froome earns epic win

Sky team rider Chris Froome can put his feet up on Monday after his epic win in Sunday's stage 15 on the summit of the mythic Mont Ventoux. The British rider was able to extend his lead over the rest of his rivals with the Alps to come.

Tour de France stage 15: Froome earns epic win
Photo: Jeff Pachoud/AFP

It was supposed to be an epic Tour de France stage in which various rivals pooled forces to loosen Chris Froome's grip on the race's yellow jersey.

Instead, for the second time in a pulsating 100th edition, the Team Sky leader pummeled his rivals into submission with a number of rapid bursts on his way to a famous victory on Mont Ventoux arguably the Tour's toughest ever climb.

The damage, two days after Spanish rival Alberto Contador had clawed back 1min 09sec to close his deficit to 2:48, was significant.

Saxo team leader Contador trailed home 1:40 in arrears. He is still third overall but is 4:25 off the pace and 11secs behind Dutchman Bauke Mollema of Belkin.

Others, like 2011 champion Cadel Evans and 2010 winner Andy Schleck, began suffering with the pace being set by Froome's Australian teammate Richie Porte and are now respectively over 15 and 19 minutes adrift.

Froome became the first yellow jersey holder since the legendary five-time winner Eddy Merckx, in 1970, to triumph on the summit of the 'Giant of Provence' as the lunar-like and wind-hit Ventoux, which is 20.8km long, is known.

But, not for the first time in this race, his performance elicited comparisons with the disgraced American Lance Armstrong, who lost his seven titles after admitting to doping.

Froome has been met with scrutiny since his stunning eighth stage victory on Ax-Trois-Domaines last Sunday and his stage 15 win immediately prompted a barrage of discussion on social media sites.

But away from the rough calculations of armchair experts and the scientific data comparing Froome's time with those of other riders, the Briton said there is another, unquantifiable factor to consider.

"So much of it is on feeling," explained Froome when asked how he mustered the energy, after nearly 240km of racing, to leave Colombian climbing specialist Nairo Quintana in his wake with two kilometres to race.

"In those kind of moments when it gets really hard, personally I'm really hurting and I like to think that hopefully the other guys are also hurting a little bit, so an acceleration at that point would just be enough to distance a few guys.

"A lot of it is mental, I think. A lot of it is mental warfare; who can dig deeper, who can suffer more. I can't really say those kinds of things are calculated.

"It's got to be more on feeling and as the race unfolds you've got to make that decision."

Froome's heroics gave him his fourth win on the race, and although he has given Mollema and Contador a huge task in the week ahead, he was not left unaffected.

He required "five to ten minutes" of oxygen upon his arrival because he felt "faint and quite short of breath". "I can't remember ever taking oxygen," he said.

The summit of Ventoux sits at 1,912 metres and Froome's need for oxygen came as something of a surprise given he is one of several leading contenders to boost his victory chances by attending high altitude training camps.

But he explained: "I think it's relatively normal, given that it was a full gas effort up until the finish."

High altitude training camps — which are designed to condition the body to the exertions put on it during racing in the mountains — have become the norm for top athletes.

Froome, who looks on his way to certain victory, said: "This is really an important part of our preparation for the Tour de France. It teaches our bodies to be able to perform at altitude at the end of stages like this after 200 kilometres.

"It gets us ready for this kind of test."

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

REAL ESTATE

EXPLAINED: What’s happening to house prices and rents in Germany amid the coronavirus crisis?

There's an increased demand on the real estate market in Germany at the moment, and there's drama looming for tenants in Berlin. Here's a look at what's going on.

EXPLAINED: What's happening to house prices and rents in Germany amid the coronavirus crisis?
Frankfurt am Main. Photo: DPA

Ever dream of owning your own home in Germany? Well, sadly, it has become more expensive since the beginning of the pandemic.

In the second quarter (April to June), condominiums were on average 1.3 percent more expensive than at the beginning of the year. Compared to the second quarter of 2019, the increase was 5.9 percent. That's according to Research and Consulting Company for Housing, Real Estate and the Environment (F+B), which Spiegel reported on Monday.

Surprisingly, the price increase for single and two-family houses was even higher than that of apartments. Compared to the previous quarter, the prices of houses increased by 2.9 percent – and even by nine percent year-on-year.

This is unusual because prices for condos in Germany have almost always risen much faster than those for houses over the past 10 years.

Experts said more people are choosing to buy homes in Germany.

“In view of historically unparalleled low lending rates, it seems to be more economical for many buyers to invest in owner-occupied properties instead of renting,” said F+B Managing Director Bernd Leutner.

READ ALSO: Housing in Germany – here's where demand and prices are soaring

It is not known for definite whether the sharp rise in the price of single-family homes is due to increased demand resulting from the coronavirus crisis, for example because families are looking for more space and gardens – but it could be a factor.

The F+B Residential Index measures the rent and price developments on the German real estate market. The index is based on the supply data of more than 30 million properties throughout Germany.

What's happening to rent?

Unlike homes, rents have hardly risen at all in the past two years. Even in the second quarter, there was only a minimal increase in new contract rents, researchers found. Compared to the previous quarter, rents rose by 0.4 percent and by one percent year-on-year.

Rents for existing properties rose by 1.3 per cent year-on-year. “On a national average, the increase in rents is therefore manageable,” said Leutner.

Berlin tenants face paying back millions of euros

There could be major problems looming for Berlin tenants

The controversial rent freeze came into force on February 23rd this year which resulted in lower rents for many tenants. But experts say it could be overturned at any moment, leaving tenants liable to pay pack the difference.

The core issue being debated in courts is whether the state of Berlin is allowed to legislate in this area.


Housing in Berlin. Photo: DPA

If the Constitutional Court overturns the rent cap, many tenants in Berlin will face paying back huge amounts, according to F+B.

Due to the still unclear legal situation, there is currently a split rental market in the city. There are “shadow rents”, i.e. “the market rents”, which are usually higher than the price of the rent cap.

And on the other hand, there's the “official” rent costs corresponding to the rental price cap. The research company analysed the advertised rental apartments before and after the law came into force and “observed the existence of two rent indications in one and the same apartment advertisement”.

READ ALSO: Berlin's district court rules in favour of rental price cap

This is often associated with the remark that “the landlord reserves the right to retroactively claim the difference between the rent cover rent and the market rent”. The tenant has to agree to this in the rental contract.

SEE ALSO: The complete guide to how you can (still) live cheaply in Berlin

According to F+B the difference is clear to see: for 3,133 apartments offered between February 23rd 2020 and June 30th, F+B assumes a capped average rent of €7.05 per square meter

However, the market rent for the apartments is an average of €13.63 per square metre – a difference of €6.58 per square metre. With an average apartment size of 60 square metres, this would mean a total difference of €1.2 million per month which tenants would have to cough up.

“The longer the decision drags on, the greater the threatening additional claims,” says F+B managing director Leutner. At the same time, the massive difference in costs shows the advantages of the new rent freeze for tenants.

In any case, a quick clarification would be in the interest of all parties involved, said the research firm.

READ ALSO: 'We're setting a clear stop sign': Berlin passes five-year rent freeze law

Despite receiving the support of Berlin's state parliament, the law is opposed by Germany's federal government which argues that regulating housing costs is a federal rather than a state matter.

 

SHOW COMMENTS