SHARE
COPY LINK

TE

Tour de France: Sky ready to alter strategy

Team Sky chief Dave Brailsford said on Monday they will change their strategy for the rest of the Tour de France in order to maintain their grip on the race and fend off challenges from rival teams, who pushed yellow jersey holder Chris Froome to the limit in Sunday's stage 9.

Tour de France: Sky ready to alter strategy
Photo: AFP

Team Sky said they are ready to adapt their strategy for the remainder of the Tour de France after the "war" of stage nine shook up race leader Chris Froome.

After the euphoria of Froome's stunning victory atop Ax-Trois-Domaines gave the Kenyan-born Briton the race lead on Saturday, Sky were put to the test on Sunday's second day in the Pyrenees as teams colluded to loosen their grip.

By the end of the stage Froome was still in command but aggressive racing by Sky's rivals saw Australian teammate Richie Porte, sitting second overall at 51secs overnight, tumble to the nether regions of the overall standings.

Sky's spectacular collapse left Froome on his own and exposed to attacks by rivals like Alberto Contador (Saxo) and Alejandro Valverde (Movistar).

Froome ultimately weathered the storm, and team principal Dave Brailsford gave him a pat on the back.

"To use a boxing analogy, he's taken the biggest right hook on the chin and he didn't flinch," said Brailsford.

Faced with suggestions that Sky had hit too hard, too soon and have upset rivals who will pounce later in the race, Brailsford was defiant.

"We've learned some lessons and there are some valuable lessons to be learned that we will take into the rest of the race," he said.

Brailsford was hesitant to elaborate but added: "We will adapt our strategy for the rest of the race. I'm not going to go into the details of what we're going to change."

While Froome did not lose any time on stage nine, the loss of Porte as a potential podium finisher is a major handicap for Sky in terms of tactics.

Attacks by either rider in the coming mountain stages would likely prompt rivals to spend energy counter-attacking, allowing Sky to save energy and attack when they decide the time is right.

Froome admitted: "From my side it's a huge shame that we don't have that card to play now, and of course it's a shame for Richie."

Porte, meanwhile, put his collapse down to an 'off-day', a common occurrence for riders on the demanding three-week Grand Tours.

"Anybody here who's been a bicycle racer knows on the Grand Tours you have good and bad days," said the Australian, the reigning Paris-Nice champion.

But he admitted that Sky's success on Saturday had elicited an "angry" response from their rivals.

"There was an angry peloton that threw everything they had at us… Yesterday was a special day, it makes for great viewing at home. But it was an absolute war."

After Sunday's stage Froome and Porte admitted they had both possibly suffered their "worst" day on the bike.

And with 12 stages remaining, including a time trial on Wednesday over 33 km and several brutal days in the Alps in the final week, most will expect Sky to come under attack again.

Porte, for one, is hoping Froome can help restore order in the peloton by taking more time off his rivals in Wednesday's time trial.

"My hope is that it (race) will become a little bit more controlled, and it is going to get easier after the time trial," added the Tasmanian.

Brailsford, meanwhile, says his team will simply have to adapt their strategy as the race moves on towards the Alps. Stage 15 to Mont Ventoux could be the next battleground.

"I don't have a crystal ball," added Brailsford.

"This is sport… we're here, we've got a team of committed riders, we've got some strong opposition, we're leading the race, we've got some time trials to come, some different mountain stages and we'll try to adapt our strategy for those."

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

There still hasn’t been an Isis attack on Germany

The last week has been brutal and shocking, but we need to stay calm and keep the events we have witnessed in perspective, argues Jörg Luyken.

There still hasn’t been an Isis attack on Germany
The attack site in Ansbach. Photo: DPA

Federal investigators have taken over the case looking into the bombing in Ansbach on Sunday that killed the attacker and left 15 other people injured, four of them seriously.

It takes a particular type of crime to go to federal prosecutors. The knife attack in Reutlingen which happened a few hours earlier is being treated as a local affair, despite also causing a fatality, as investigators believe it was a crime of passion.

The Ansbach case is different. Like the axe attack in Würzburg six days earlier, there is believed to be an Islamist motive behind it.

Prosecutors are investigating whether the bomber, Mohammed D., was a member of Isis and whether other people assisted in the attack.

But at this stage the evidence seems far from clear.

On Monday investigators found a video on the bomber’s phone in which he pledged allegiance to Isis.

Shortly after officials announced this, Isis claimed him as “our soldier” and later released a video of a man whose face was conveniently covered, but whom they claimed was Mohammed D.

There is more than a whiff of opportunism here. But that isn’t all.

Bild has done interesting research into the bomb and the bomber, and their findings give the distinct impression of a lack of competence to the operation which doesn’t fit with the deadly and effective nature of previous Isis attacks.

According to the tabloid, the charge was TATP, the substance used in the attacks on Paris and Brussels. But unlike in those attacks this easy to obtain but difficult to use substance was obviously not put to work by a skilled bomb maker.

Bild points out how undamaged the bomber’s rucksack was after the attack, as photos from the scene show.

Police sources also told the tabloid that D. “wanted to place the bomb at the entrance and detonate it from afar. That suggests that it exploded by mistake.”

The bomber himself was the only casualty and even he did not die immediately, as a woman at the scene attempted to resuscitate him.

“The explosive power of the bomb doesn’t seem to have been so great. One possible explanation is that the fuse detonated but the explosives didn’t,” Bild concludes.

Furthermore, the planning was unconvincing. The spot where Mohammed D.eventually set off the bomb does not appear to have been intended target. A security guard at a nearby music festival, where 2,000 people had congregated, saw D. observing him and walking up and down before deciding against entering.

This doesn't sound like the hardened, brainwashed murderers who killed police officers in front of Charlie Hebdo's offices or those who stormed the Bataclan concert hall with assault rifles.

The location is also susprising. Ansbach is a town of 40,000 people that few people outside Bavaria had heard of before the attack.

Isis, like al Qaeda, know that terrorism is most effective when it strikes the heart of a country.

New York, Madrid, London, Paris and Brussels have all been the site of the first terror attacks on other western countries. Ansbach would be a quixotic choice for their first German target, to say the least.

What we know about Mohammed D. also does not suggest he was a committed religious fanatic. He had tried to commit suicide twice, something considered a grave sin in Islam, like in Christianity. The fact that this attack came as Germany was trying to deport him also suggests a personal vendetta played a role.

The Würzburg attacker, we should also keep in mind, was someone who had radicalized himself, according to what we know from investigations.

The other two attacks last week – in Munich and Reutlingen – meanwhile, had nothing to do with Islamism.

None of this changes the fact that people have died on the streets of Germany in terrifying and random acts of aggression. It also shouldn’t stop us from looking more seriously at the risk that isolated, confused young refugees may turn to Isis as a channel for their anger.

But it does mean that we should keep perspective. Rampages can happen anywhere – they certainly happened in Germany before refugees from Muslim countries started arriving. And we know that they often lead to copycat attacks.

It is clear that there is no easy way to prevent them, but it is encouraging to see that Bavaria has reacted by announcing plans to strengthen its psychiatric care facilities.

On Tuesday Bavarian health minister Melanie Huml said that she wanted to “comprehensively build up psychiatric care for people in emergency situations.”

It is also no bad thing that enhanced security concepts are being discussed – it would be too idealistic to think every attack can be stopped through better treatment of troubled individuals.

What is less helpful is making premature and sweeping statements, for example when Bavarian minister-president Horst Seehofer began speaking about a “completely new dimension of terror”, before the facts support this assertion.

Let’s not fall into Isis’s propaganda trap and automatically assume they planned this. We shouldn’t need to remind ourselves that the aim of terrorism is to make us scared.

Now more than ever we need to stay calm and wait for the evidence to decide for us: until proven otherwise, I still say 'there has been no Isis attack on Germany.'

Correction: this article originally stated that the Charlie Hebdo attacks were carried out by Isis. They were in fact carried out by Al Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula.