SHARE
COPY LINK

COMPETITIVENESS

Sweden climbs in global competitiveness ranking

Sweden maintained its place as the most competitive country in the European Union (EU), according to a new ranking from the Swiss business school IMD, which saw Sweden creep up a spot to the fourth most competitive country in the world.

Sweden climbs in global competitiveness ranking

The 2013 index, released on Thursday, marks the 25th year IMD has published its World Competitiveness Yearbook, which ranks how successful countries are at increasing their prosperity by managing their economic and human resources.

The United States claimed the top spot in this year’s ranking with a perfect score of 100, followed by Switzerland (93.357), and Hong Kong (92.783), with Sweden landing fourth with a score of 90.531.

Sweden received number one rankings in Management Practices, Education, and Health and Environment, with its lowest marks coming in Fiscal Policy (47) and Employment (38).

The index listed consumer price inflation, exchange rate stability, and corporate tax rates as the areas where Sweden had made the biggest improvements.

Areas where Sweden showed the biggest declines included government budget surplus/deficit, real short-term interest rates, and real GDP growth per capita.

Respondents polled for IMD’s index listed Sweden’s policy stability and predictability, effective legal environment, skilled workforce, and reliable infrastructure as key attractiveness factors of the Swedish economy.

Sweden was also recognized as one of five competitiveness “winners” for having climbed from 19th place up to 4th place since 1997, the year IMD combined rankings of developing and emerging economies.

Norway (6) and Germany (9) were the only other two European countries in the top ten, which also included Singapore (5), Canada (7), United Arab Emirates (8), and Qatar (10).

The results of the 2013 ranking reveal that Europe’s economies have “stalled” according to Stéphane Garelli, director of the IMD World Competitiveness Center, who added that structural reforms are “unavoidable” for struggling eurozone economies, but that economic growth is still key for maintaining competitiveness.

He warned over the consequences of harsh austerity measures.

“In addition, the harshness of austerity measures too often antagonizes the population. In the end, countries need to preserve social cohesion to deliver prosperity,” Garelli said in a statement.

The IMD rankings feature 60 countries and are based on statistics and assessments from business leaders. The results were comprised from a survey of more than 4,200 international executives, and revolved around four main criteria: economic performance, government efficiency, business efficiency, and infrastructure.

The Local/dl

Follow The Local on Twitter

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

UN

Why Norway is set to lose top spot on UN development ranking

Norway regularly takes the top spot on the United Nations Human Development Index, but a new parameter is set to change that.

Why Norway is set to lose top spot on UN development ranking
File photo: AFP

The UN’s Human Development Index (HDI) ranks countries on how well they provide conditions for people to reach their potential, using parameters including life expectancy at birth, expected years of schooling and gross national income.

Norway is top of the 2020 HDI, a ranking not uncommon for the Nordic nation.

The report, which comes from the UN Development programme (UNDP), ranks countries in relation to progress on the UN’s global development targets. Like it was this year, Norway is regularly ranked the world’s top nation by the UN.

Despite this consistency, Norway can no longer call itself the ‘world’s best country’ based on the ranking, national broadcaster NRK writes.

A new addition to the ranking will include the costs to nature and the environment of gross national product. That will make CO2 admissions and individual carbon footprints part of the broader assessment of development.

According to the UNDP, emissions are a new and experimental lens through which to view development. But the inclusion of climate and the environment gives the index a different look.

When CO2 emissions and resource consumption are factored in, Norway finds itself in a much more moderate 16th place on the UN development ranking.

The adjusted list is yet to be published by the UN, but the Norwegian national broadcaster has been informed of the new positions, NRK states in the report.

Norway’s CO2 emissions of 8.3 tonnes per resident are among the 30 worst values of included countries, and it also fares poorly in a measurement of material resource use per resident, resulting in a lower overall position.

“Norway loses its top placing because of our high imprint on the planet. This is an import debate and it’s time we had it,” Bård Vegar Solhjell, director of the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), told NRK.

READ ALSO: Norway ranked world's top nation for 'human development'

SHOW COMMENTS