SHARE
COPY LINK

RACISM

Blatter cools stance on racism sanctions

FIFA president Sepp Blatter on Friday eased his hardline stance on combating racial abuse and violence in stadiums.

Blatter cools stance on racism sanctions
Photo: Marcello Casal Jr./ABr

Blatter previously said football clubs should be docked points or relegated if their fans were found guilty of racist abuse and violence, however he is now suggesting such measures would be difficult to enforce.

Blatter had said last January that slapping financial penalties on clubs or ordering them to play matches behind closed doors did not go far enough.

But in comments Friday he appeared to recognise the practical difficulty of enforcing harder-hitting measures.

"How far should we go? Where should we stop?" the boss of world football's governing body said at a meeting of the company Early Warning System, which monitors matches on FIFA's behalf to fight match-fixing.

"Can we bring an end to violence or racism by docking points or relegating a team? Or would such measures lead people to come to games to get the match abandoned," he said.

"We should do all we can but there's a danger that if we have matches replayed or if we punish clubs on the sporting front, it will open the door to hooligan groups who will come to deliberately cause trouble."

FIFA later released a statement insisting that Blatter had not backtracked on his previous stance but was merely asking rhetorical questions about the feasibility of implementing tough sanctions.

"FIFA President Blatter today reiterated … the need for punishment that hits hard against any form of racism," said the statement.

"As mentioned previously the FIFA President underlined that fines achieve little, but points deductions and exclusion from competitions would be effective measures. He also stressed that prevention must go hand in hand with punishment.

"He acknowledged that the implementation of these sanctions might pose some challenges, such as a potential risk that the system could be abused by some spectators for the only purpose of getting a very unfair advantage for their team.

"Such issues will be carefully examined and will in no way alter the FIFA President's very strong commitment towards the eradication of the racism scourge from football and his zero tolerance towards any form of racism.

"At no stage did the FIFA President say any words that could be interpreted as him backing away from his firm position to sanction actions of any form of racism."

Back in January, Blatter's remarks came after AC Milan's Kevin-Prince Boateng and his team-mates walked off a pitch during a friendly with fourth-division Italian side Pro Patria in protest at a solid hail of abuse from rival fans.

After initially disagreeing with Boateng's decision to take the laws of the game into his own hands, Blatter swung behind the player and said tough action was needed and football should show the way because of its worldwide following.

In November 2011 Blatter caused controversy by denying there was racism on the field of play, indicating that if abuse did arise at a match the issue should be settled by a handshake at the end of the match.

He swiftly apologised for using "unfortunate words" and insisted he backed "zero tolerance" when it comes to racism anywhere in the game.

Boateng was recently named a member of FIFA's anti-racism taskforce.

On Friday, Blatter also said that a proposal for uniform sanctions across all of FIFA's 209 member associations would be put to a vote at its congress in May.

"The same standard must apply for each and every league and national association," he said.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

RACISM

Swiss parliament wants ban on extremist symbols

Swiss lawmakers on Wednesday voted in favour of banning the display of extremist and racist symbols, starting with those of a Nazi nature.

Swiss parliament wants ban on extremist symbols

The National Council lower house of parliament voted by 133 to 38 in favour of banning the public use of racist, violence-promoting and extremist symbols, such as Nazi symbols.

Switzerland, which stayed neutral during World War II, has come under pressure to fall in line with a number of other European countries in banning Nazi symbols.

Full bans are in place in Germany, Poland and several other eastern European nations.

The Swiss parliament as a whole is now in favour, after the Council of States upper house voted for such a ban in December.

The plans would also cover gestures, words, salutes or flags.

The National Council also voted by 132 to 40 for the measures to be introduced in stages — a move the government supports.

A ban on easily identifiable Nazi symbols could be implemented quickly, while other racist and extremist symbols could be identified and banned further down the line.

“We don’t want a swastika or a Hitler salute in our country, ever!” said Green lawmaker Raphael Mahaim.

“Today, in Switzerland, it is possible, it is even permitted, to display a flag with a swastika on your balcony. It is possible to put a flag bearing the image of the SS on the windshield of your car. It is possible to give the Hitler salute in public spaces.

“This situation is intolerable.”

Debate on other symbols 

Justice minister Beat Jans said the government, called the Federal Council, had hitherto relied on prevention as the main pillar against racism, but now thinks legal measures are needed.

“Anti-Semitic incidents, particularly those involving the use of Nazi symbols, have increased sharply in recent times,” he said.

“Against this background, the Federal Council decided last week that it is positive about the gradual implementation of the motion.”

He said the government wanted to introduce a special law which would mean fines could therefore be imposed.

As for banning Nazi symbols first, Mahaim accepted that debates on other symbols “will be much more difficult”.

“For example, what about the Z symbol of Putin’s army of aggression? What about the Ku Klux Klan symbol? What about the hammer and sickle symbol?” he said.

The no votes and abstentions all came from the hard-right Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which is the largest faction in the lower chamber.

SVP lawmaker Barbara Steinemann said Switzerland had successfully been able to keep extremism down to “a base of a few meaningless weirdos”.

She said a ban on symbols would not prevent the “rampant” anti-Semitic attitudes in universities and “intellectual milieus”.

Steinemann said Nazi symbolism had risen only since the Gaza war erupted in October, and “even if you don’t like to hear it, this is the influence of immigration from non-European cultures.

“We are literally engaging in symbolic politics, and we shouldn’t be doing that,” the Zurich lawmaker said.

SHOW COMMENTS