SHARE
COPY LINK

NORTH KOREA

Human rights chief slams North Korean ‘abuses’

UN human rights chief Navi Pillay on Monday demanded an international probe into the alarming human rights situation in ultra-authoritarian North Korea, decrying more than a half-century of devastating abuses.

Human rights chief slams North Korean 'abuses'
Navi Pillay. (Photo: UNHCR)

"It is time the international community took a much firmer step towards finding the truth and applying serious pressure to bring about change for this beleaguered, subjugated population of 20 million people," the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a rare and strongly worded statement on North Korea.

Pillay lamented the "deplorable human rights situation" in North Korea, "which in one way or another affects almost the entire population and has no parallel anywhere in the world."

She acknowledged that there had been some hope that the change of leadership in the single-party state after the death of Kim Jong-Il in
December 2011 could bring change.
   
"But a year after Kim Jong-Un (Kim Jong-Il's youngest son) became the country's new supreme leader, we see almost no sign of improvement," she lamented.
 
 Pillay also cautioned that the international community had been so concerned about North Korea's nuclear programme and rocket launches that it had largely overlooked the situation of the population in the country.
   
Despite the countrys almost total isolation, the UN human rights chief said the little information that has filtered out bore testimony to "a system that represents the very antithesis of international human rights norms."

She described meetings with two survivors of North Korea's network of political prison camps, which are believed to hold at least 200,000 people.
 
 "Their personal stories were extremely harrowing," she said, listing rampant violations inside the camps, "including torture, . . . summary
executions, rape, slave labour and forms of collective punishment that may amount to crimes against humanity."
 
The living conditions in the camps were "atrocious", she said, describing an acute lack of food, medical care and clothing.
 
One mother told her how she had been forced to wrap her new-born baby in leaves to keep her warm.
 
The other person she met had been born into a camp, where he had spent the first 23 years of his life.
   
"He was not only tortured and subjected to forced labour, but, at the age of 14, was also made to watch the execution of his mother and his brother," she said.
 
The widespread use of the death penalty is also cause for deep concern, Pillay said, noting that people in North Korea could be executed for "minor offences after wholly inadequate judicial processes."
 
She also highlighted the still unresolved cases of Japanese and South Korean nationals abducted by North Korean agents in the 1970s and '80s.
 
"I believe an in-depth inquiry into one of the worst, but least understood and reported, human rights situations in the world is not only fully
justified, but long overdue," Pillay said.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

ANALYSIS: Fortress Denmark wants to send its asylum seekers outside Europe

Denmark already has one of Europe's harshest stances on immigration, but the wealthy Scandinavian country is set to adopt legislation on Thursday enabling it to open asylum centres outside Europe where applicants would be sent to live.

ANALYSIS: Fortress Denmark wants to send its asylum seekers outside Europe
A group of refugees arrive at Kigali International Airport after a life-saving evacuation flight to Rwanda from Libya. Photo: UNHCR/Eugene Sibomana

The latest move by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s Social Democratic anti-immigration government is aimed at deterring migrants from coming to Denmark at all.

In practice, asylum seekers would have to submit an application in person at the Danish border and then be flown to an asylum centre outside Europe while their application is being processed.

If the application is approved and the person is granted refugee status, he or she would be given the right to live in the host country.

The proposal is expected to sail through parliament on Thursday, supported by a majority including the far-right, despite opposition from some left-wing parties.

Denmark normally has a reputation for being one of the happiest countries in the world. But it has repeatedly made headlines in recent years with its anti-immigration policies, including its official “zero refugees” target, its withdrawal of residence permits from Syrians now that it considers parts of the wartorn country safe, and its crackdown on Danish “ghettos” in a bid to reduce the number of “non-Western” residents.

The aim of the new law is to establish a legal foundation for the transfer of people seeking international protection in Denmark to a third country, according to the immigration ministry.

Denmark would foot the bill for the operation, but the processing of asylum requests would be carried out by the host country. If a person’s asylum request is rejected, the migrant would be asked to leave the host country.

But even “those whose asylum claims are successful after being exported will not be allowed to come ‘back’ to Denmark to enjoy refugee status. They will simply get refugee status in the as-yet unnamed host country,” University of Copenhagen migration expert Martin Lemberg-Pedersen told AFP.

In talks with Rwanda

No country has as yet agreed to collaborate with Denmark on the project, but the government says it is in talks with five to 10 countries, without identifying them.

“A system of transferring asylum seekers to a third country must, of course, be established within the framework of international conventions,” Migration Minister Mattias Tesfaye told AFP. “That will be a prerequisite for an agreement. In addition, we need to have a monitoring mechanism in place so that we can continuously ensure that everything is going as planned.”

He had previously said the countries may not necessarily be democracies “in the way we see things.”

Danish media have mentioned Egypt, Eritrea and Ethiopia as possibilities. Denmark is meanwhile known to be in talks with Rwanda — which also discussed similar plans with Israel in the past.

At the end of April, Denmark and Rwanda signed a memorandum of understanding on asylum and migration cooperation, though the document doesn’t specifically cover external asylum processing.

“Denmark is committed to finding new and sustainable solutions to the present migration and refugee challenges that affect countries of origin, transit and destination,” the document states.

‘Risk of domino effect’

The new legislation marks a complete U-turn on immigration for Denmark’s Social Democrats under Frederiksen’s reign.

For many years, the populist Danish People’s Party had a monopoly on anti-immigration policy. But their stance has become the norm, University of Copenhagen political scientist Kasper Hansen noted.

Five years after the adoption of a law that allowed Denmark to seize asylum seekers’ valuables — legislation that made headlines but was actually rarely applied — authorities continue to practice deterrence.

“This proposal is the continuation of the symbolic policy. It’s a little bit like Donald Trump and his wall,” the secretary-general of ActionAid Denmark, Tim Whyte, told AFP.

In 2019, only 2,716 people sought asylum in Denmark, eight times fewer than during the 2015 migrant crisis. While the initiative will yield political gain at home, international observers have expressed concern.

For the UN refugee agency, the UNHCR, the proposal is “contrary to the principles of international refugee cooperation.”

“By initiating such a drastic and restrictive change in Danish refugee legislation, Denmark risks starting a domino effect, where other countries in Europe and in neighbouring regions will also explore the possibility of limiting the protection of refugees on their soil,” UNHCR’s representative in the Nordic and Baltic countries, Henrik Nordentoft, told news agency Ritzau.

Denmark is letting its European partners down, Whyte said. “Refugees will seek asylum in Germany, France, Sweden. It will not deter them to cross the Mediterranean Sea but they won’t get to Denmark, which in a way is abdicating its responsibilities.”

SHOW COMMENTS