SHARE
COPY LINK

SICK LEAVE

Agency to probe Swedish mothers’ sick leave

Swedish mothers stay home with sick children more often than fathers, leading to a huge gap in leave days and prompting a government inquiry to be carried out by the Swedish Social Insurance Agency (Försäkringskassan).

Agency to probe Swedish mothers' sick leave

Mothers also take more sick days for themselves than fathers, further widening the gap between men and women.

“The big difference between how many days men and women take off is one of the key health insurance issues,“ said minister for social security Ulf Kristersson to daily Dagens Nyheter (DN).

Previous studies have suggested that men and women take the same amount of leave until they become parents.

According to research from the Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy, IFAU, mothers of two-year-olds take twice as much leave as the fathers and the difference continues for several years after. In two out of three cases it is the mother who stays home to nurse the kids back to health when they get ill.

To find out why this is the case, the government will next week officially commission a study from the Social Insurance Agency on parents with children born in 2005, scrutinizing factors such as profession, income, socioeconomic status as well as who took most parental leave.

The study will also look at both mothers’ and the children’s health and how common it is for mothers to go off sick themselves after having nursed their infectious children back to health.

That women often function as both family project leaders and logisticians is often discussed in the Swedish press and it appears as if these extra tasks are taking their toll on working mothers.

“We’ve been very good at getting women into the work place but we haven’t managed to increase men’s involvement in family life,“ said Kristersson to DN.

“It seems to be mostly women who are affected when work and family life clashes. And the only thing the women can call in sick for is work.”

Kristersson fears that women taking more days off for sickness reasons may lead to lower incomes and thereby lower pensions.

Being absent more often also puts the women at risk of getting lower status in the workplace as well as making women in general less attractive on the labour market.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

WOMEN

Should stay-at-home parents in Switzerland be paid a salary?

A new Swiss divorce ruling sparks a proposal that parents who stay at home and take care of children while the other spouse works, should be compensated by the government.

Should stay-at-home parents in Switzerland be paid a salary?
Housework should be compensated by the government, some say. Photo by Guillaume Suivant / AFP

What is the new divorce rule?

Switzerland’s highest court has handed down a decision removing the responsibility of an employed spouse to financially support the partner who has not worked outside of home during marriage.

While the ruling doesn’t mention gender, it particularly affects women.

Specifically, the court lifted the so-called “45-year-old rule”, under which stay-at-home spouses were not obligated to support themselves after divorce, if they were over 45 years old.

In its ruling, the court said that “the possibility of gainful employment must always be assumed” regardless of age, though exemptions could be made in some situations, including care of small children, lack of professional experience, and health.

How has this ruling spawned off the idea of compensating stay-at-home parents?

It came from a Swiss writer and editor Sibylle Stillhart who said in an interview that “finding a well-paying job after not having been employed at all or only part-time for years is not easy, if not impossible”.

She added that taking care of housework and children, requires 58 hours a week of “unpaid labour”.

What does she propose?

She said the state should pay income for domestic work.

“This way, if a couple separates and the woman finds herself with her dependent children and no salaried work, she would nevertheless be supported by the community for the services rendered, in particular for the education of the children who, later, will also contribute to national prosperity through their work”.

Stillhart suggested that a monthly salary of 7,000 francs for a family with two children is fair.

“Don’t tell me that Switzerland is not rich enough for that “, she added.

READ MORE: ‘Unprecedented crisis’: New figures show stark impact of pandemic on all Swiss job sectors

Is this likely to happen?

Rudolf Minsch, economist at Economiesuisse, an umbrella organisation of Swiss businesses, said the proposal is not realistic.

“This would lead to massive tax increases. And it would not be profitable from the point of view of equality between men and women at the professional level, because women could be satisfied with this income and no longer seek to enter the labour market”, he said.

Is this idea new?

Not quite. While it’s the first one of its kind to be created as a response to new divorce rulings, the idea of basic income for everyone in Switzerland was floated around before.

On June 5, 2016, Swiss voters rejected the initiative “For an unconditional basic income”, which proposed that each resident receive 2,500 francs a month, regardless of whether they are employed or not. 

 All the cantons had said no, as had 76.9 percent of the population.

A few cantons stood out by being more open to the idea, such as Basel-City (36 percent in favour), Jura (35.8 percent) and Geneva (34.7 percent).

Despite this rejection, the idea continues to circulate in Switzerland and internationally.

READ MORE: What do teachers earn in Switzerland – and where do they earn the most?

SHOW COMMENTS