SHARE
COPY LINK
HADDILE'S DEPORTATION BATTLE

DEPORTATION

Migration Board delays toddler’s deportation

In the face of mounting public pressure, the Swedish Migration Board (Migrationsverket) has decided that 2-year-old Haddile, an abandoned toddler facing deportation to France, can remain in Sweden with her foster parents until further notice.

Migration Board delays toddler's deportation

“It’s only a partial victory. But it’s good that they listened to the Swedish people,” Malen Liewehr, Haddile’s foster mother, told the Aftonbladet newspaper.

Haddile, who had been abandoned by her birth mother and then suffered alleged abuse from her stepfather, was facing deportation to France following a previous ruling by the Migration Board.

While Haddile’s foster parents have expressed their desire to adopt the little girl, who has French citizenship through her mother, the agency’s inability to contact the toddler’s biological parents has complicated the process.

According to the Migration Board, deporting Haddile to France, a country in which she has never lived or visited, would make it possible for her to be reunited with her mother, an Algerian-born woman with French citizenship.

News of the girl’s impending deportation sparked a public backlash, with tens of thousands of Swedes signing a petition in favour of her being allowed to stay in Sweden.

On Sunday, Swedish migration authorities issued a statement clarifying that Haddile could remain in Sweden while the agency continued the search for her birth parents.

“Haddile Khemice can remain in her foster home while efforts to find the parents continue,” the Migration Board said in a statement.

The agency explained that a more in-depth assessment of the girl’s case is required before she can be deported – if her parents or other relatives cannot be found.

Haddile’s foster parents welcomed the news that the little girl wouldn’t be deported immediately, but remained concerned about that might happen next.

“When they start talking about relatives, I’m not sure what they’re talking about. They know there is a problem related to honour culture in this case. It’s in Haddile’s file. There is a remaining risk that she could suffer if she ends up with relatives. I still don’t understand what they’re thinking, because that’s not in the best interests of the child,” said foster father Miklos Liewehr, to Aftonbladet.

According to legal scholar Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg, deporting Hadille could be illegal.

“Personally, I think it would be rather remarkable if they deported the girl, considering her entire existence with family has taken place in Sweden with a family that wants to adopt her,” she told the TT news agency.

While the case is complicated from a legal perspective, there is a strong case to be made that Haddile’s strong emotional ties stemming from her relationship with her foster family means the her relationship is covered by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, explained Jänterä-Jareborg.

“Which obviously, if it’s taken seriously, would mean that she couldn’t be deported,” she said.

TT/The Local/dl

Follow The Local on Twitter

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

INTEGRATION

New Danish rules announced for family reunification of children

Denmark’s Ministry of Immigration and Integration has announced new rules regarding the family reunification of children, after controversial cases in which children were deported caused public outcry.

New Danish rules announced for family reunification of children
File photo: Asger Ladefoged/Ritzau Scanpix

Foreign residents of Denmark who want their children to move to the country to live with them must apply for this as soon as possible and no later than three months after being granted residency, the ministry announced.

Meanwhile, an existing demand for good “long-term integration prospects” for children applying for family reunification will be scrapped.

The government has agreed with the Danish People’s Party and Social Democrats over the proposed rule change and will now formulate a bill, according to a ministry press statement.

Rules on the area have seen heavy debate in recent months, particularly in relation to a case involving 13-year-old Atcharapan “Mint” Yaungyai, who in October last year left Denmark, where she lived with her mother and Danish stepfather and stepbrother.

Mint, who moved to Denmark in 2017 and attended school at seventh grade, the normal level for her age, was refused permission to remain in the country due to not fulfilling Immigration Board (Udlændingenævnet) requirements over integration. She was deported to Thailand, where she was accompanied by her mother.

The reason given by authorities for her deportation was that she was considered have lived in Thailand for too long to become integrated in Denmark. Several politicians spoke publicly to criticise the outcome of her case.

The Local Denmark is introducing Membership: You can join today

The aim of the new rule is to stress the importance of early application, according to the ministry press statement.

“If a parent wishes to live and reside in Denmark with their child, they must bring their child here immediately,” immigration minister Inger Støjberg said in the statement.

“Children should not just be left in home countries for several years,” Støjberg also said, adding that this constituted a risk that “the child could, for example, end up at Quran school”.

No elaboration was given in the statement as to why Islamic schools were cited, but Støjberg has previously backed assessment of children’s ability to adapt to Danish society.

Such a measure can prevent parents choosing to leave them in home countries for years with the aim of preventing them from becoming 'too Danish', according to the minister.

Current rules in the area have resulted in a number of cases such as that of Mint, who attended state school in Denmark and speaks fluent Danish.

The new rules will apply to cases in which one parent lives in Denmark while the other remains in the home country or a third country.

The rule change will not affect Mint’s case and will only apply to future cases, Støjberg has previously confirmed.

READ ALSO:

SHOW COMMENTS