SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

‘Blessing’ not to be in EU: Swiss poll

A survey has found that the Swiss are even less in favour of joining the EU than they were last year.

 

'Blessing' not to be in EU: Swiss poll
Paivi Tiittanen

The survey, carried out by the MIS Research Institute in Lausanne, has found that 82 percent of Swiss people are against accession talks with the EU, preferring instead to remain with the current bilateral treaty arrangements, newspaper Tages Anzeiger reported.

This figure is up from 72 percent last year, and will be the subject of a discussion on Thursday at the “Forum des 100” in Lausanne, which has invited some 850 guests, including Federal Councillor for the Free Democratic Party of Switzerland, Simonetta Sommaruga.

The survey was conducted with 507 people from the German-speaking part of Switzerland, 500 from the French part, and 200 from the Ticino. 300 executives were also interviewed across the country, both Swiss and foreign, working in politics, business, culture and government.

While some 54 percent of the business leaders thought that membership of the EU would give Switzerland a chance to help shape Europe, only 24 percent of the population shared this opinion. More than half of the population felt that accession to the EU would weaken Switzerland’s economic performance in comparison with only 40 percent of the executives surveyed.

Overall, 64 percent of the population and 51 percent of the executives viewed Switzerland’s position outside the EU as a “blessing”.

The study also found that 58 percent of participants aged between 18 and 29 years thought that Switzerland should not allow an automatic tax data exchange with the EU, compared with only 46 percent of people aged over 60 years. Just over half of the executive group thought that Switzerland should not exchange the data automatically.

Approximately 46 percent of both the population and the executives thought that Switzerland was doing enough to protect banking secrecy, whereas 36 percent of the population and 30 percent of the executives believed that Switzerland should be doing more.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

EUROPEAN UNION

Why does Switzerland have to comply with European court rulings?

Europe's top rights court ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, condemning it to a hefty fee. But why does Switzerland have to abide by this decision?

Why does Switzerland have to comply with European court rulings?

In a landmark ruling handed down on April 9th, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg sided with a group of Swiss pensioners who ‘sued’ the country for not doing enough to mitigate the effects of global warming. 

The ECHR ruled that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the “right to respect for private and family life,” and ordered the government to pay the complainants a fine of €80,000 (78,555 francs). 

READ ALSO: Who are Switzerland’s victorious climate ‘Elders’? 

While environmental groups and a number of political parties welcomed the verdict, questions also arose about why Switzerland, which is not a member of the EU, must comply with the decision handed down by the Council of Europe’s court.

This fact was not lost on the populist, anti-EU Swiss People’s Party (SVP).

One of its MPs, Jean-Luc Addor, questioned not only the court’s judgment, but also the fact that foreign judges have ‘meddled’ in Swiss matters.

“What is the legitimacy of the ECHR to pronounce such a ‘condemnation’?,” he asked.” Is it now going to send the European army to Switzerland?”

So why is Switzerland obligated to conform to the ECHR’s judgment? 

In 1974, the country, though neutral, signed the European Convention on Human Rights.

As the European court was established expressly to monitor the parties’ compliance with the provisions enshrined in the Convention, Switzerland must heed its judgements. (The ECHR hears only matters related to human rights. It does not handle any criminal cases).

To ensure that rulings are just and impartial, the ECHR’s judges come from the 46 countries that ratified the Convention.

Switzerland is represented by Andreas Zünd, who has served on the ECHR since January 2021.

How do Swiss cases end up in front of ECHR judges?

Switzerland has different court levels: district, cantonal, and federal.

Complainants first file their cases in the district court. If they are not happy with the verdict, they can appeal it within 30 days, at which point the case will go to the higher judicial level, that is, the cantonal court.

The next step up the judicial ladder is the Federal Supreme court, the highest judicial authority in Switzerland.

Headquartered in Lausanne, it is the final instance on all appeals against decisions of the cantonal courts.

But though this final judgment can’t be appealed in Switzerland, the case  — if it relates to rights outlined in the Convention — can be taken to the ECHR.

READ ALSO: What you should know about Switzerland’s courts 

What ‘Swiss cases’ have been judged by the European court?

The climate activists’ case is the latest of dozens of rulings involving complaints from Switzerland. 

Some of the other successful ones involved a widower whose pension benefits were denied by a Swiss court; a Romanian woman fined for beginning in Geneva; and a Sudanese man who won his appeal against deportation from Switzerland

You can see all the ECHR rulings for Switzerland (in German or French) for the last 45 years here.

SHOW COMMENTS