SHARE
COPY LINK

OIL

Lundin: war crimes allegations ‘unfounded’

Ian and Lukas Lundin have rejected accusations that the Lundin Group consists of "opportunistic, dictator-hugging businessmen", arguing that allegations of human rights abuses are "unfounded, unfair and in some cases, absurd".

Lundin: war crimes allegations 'unfounded'

In an opinion article in the Dagens Nyheter daily on Sunday, the brothers defended their father Adolf’s business record and accused the Aftonbladet daily of having “set aside the principles for serious investigative journalism”.

“The allegations which, among others, Aftonbladet and some internationally active non-profit organizations have directed against Adolf Lundin and other members of the family and the men and women working in companies within the Lundin group are simply unfounded, unfair and in some cases, even absurd.”

The allegations refer to alleged human rights abuses in connection with oil exploration in southern Sudan between 1997 and 2003.

Magnus Elving of the International Prosecution Chamber in Stockholm (Internationella åklagarkammaren i Stockholm) is investigating claims made in a report entitled “Unpaid Debt” framed by an umbrella group named the European Coalition on Oil in Sudan (ECOS) and present in 2010.

The report alleges that Sudanese troops, in collaboration with militias, attacked and drove away the civilian population in areas where companies could drill for oil.

Lukas and Ian Lundin on Saturday welcomed this investigation.

“Thus far, we ourselves, or other employees of the Lundin Group, have not been called to any questioning or interviews – but are looking forward to cooperating fully if we are asked to do so,” the pair wrote.

The brothers leapt to the defence of their father, who built the flagship family firm from modest beginnings in the 1980s into the major energy concern that it is today.

“To cast us who work in the Lundin Group as opportunistic, dictator-hugging businessmen is to display a complete lack of understanding of Adolf Lundin and the values ​​he stood for – and for the values ​​that we continue to stand for today.”

The pair argued that contrary to perception in some quarters of the Swedish press, the Lundin Group has contributed to economic growth in the countries in which they have been active.

“In our opinion there is no doubt that the Lundin Group’s presence has been of benefit to the communities and the peoples in all regions where we have been and are still active,” they claimed.

The brothers concluded by arguing that they were “long-term and responsible actors with the commodities sector” and called for a broader debate on how oil and mining firms can further contribute to “economic growth, environmental responsibility and human rights in the regions in which we are active”.

The investigation into alleged human rights abuses in Sudan covers the period between 1997 and 2003. Lundin Oil was founded in 1997 and in 1999 the firm made a major discovery of oil in the Thar Jath structure in block 5A in southern Sudan.

Lundin Oil was subsequently sold to Talisman Energy in 2001 and the Sudan holdings, together with Iranian and Russian assets, were transferred to a new company Lundin Petroleum.

Lundin Petroleum sold its licence in Thar Jath to Petronas Carigali for $142.5 million in 2003.

On July 20th 2002 the government of Sudan (GOS) and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) signed a preliminary peace agreement in a first step to ending almost 20 years of civil war.

A comprehensive peace agreement was signed in January 2005 and South Sudan seceded to form an independent state on July 9th 2011.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

OIL

NGOs take Norway to European Court over Arctic oil exploration

Two NGOs and six young climate activists have decided to take Norway to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to demand the cancellation of oil permits in the Arctic, Greenpeace announced on Tuesday.

NGOs take Norway to European Court over Arctic oil exploration
Northern Norway. Photo by Vidar Nordli-Mathisen on Unsplash.

It’s the latest turn in a legal tussle between environmental organisations Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth Norway on one side and the Norwegian state on the other.

The organisations are demanding the government cancel 10 oil exploration licenses in the Barents Sea awarded in 2016, arguing it was unconstitutional.

Referring to the Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the organisations claim that the oil licenses violated article 112 of Norway’s constitution, guaranteeing everyone the right to a healthy environment.”

The six activists, alongside Greenpeace Nordic and Young Friends of the Earth Norway, hope that the European Court of Human Rights will hear their case and find that Norway’s oil expansion is in breach of human rights,” Greenpeace said in a statement.

In December, Norway’s Supreme Court rejected the claim brought by the organisations, their third successive legal defeat.

READ MORE: Norway sees oil in its future despite IEA’s warnings 

While most of the judges on the court agreed that article 112 could be invoked if the state failed to meet its climate and environmental obligations– they did not think it was applicable in this case.

The court also held that the granting of oil permits was not contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights, in part because they did not represent “a real and immediate risk” to life and physical integrity.

“The young activists and the environmental organisations argue that this judgment was flawed, as it discounted the significance of their environmental constitutional rights and did not take into account an accurate assessment of the consequences of climate change for the coming generations,” Greenpeace said.

On Friday, the Norwegian government unveiled a white paper on the country’s energy future, which still includes oil exploration despite a warning from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The IEA recently warned that all future fossil fuel projects must be scrapped if the world is to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

The Norwegian case is an example of a global trend in which climate activists are increasingly turning to courts to pursue their agenda.

SHOW COMMENTS